• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Nostradamus predict the death of Princess Diana, The Queen, And for the Heir!

Rwalsh

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
305
I know James Randi is very skeptic in the beleif of Nostradamus - to whom I feel sorry for.

So here is my Decipher. Only I written it for the queen instead of the Kings name.

http://newsaxon.org/blog/view/id_17448

Edited by Locknar: 
Edited, breach of Rule 4.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It took you 22 months to post this indecipherable thread?

Let me rephrase that: What is your point?
 
Huh. I never thought of it that way. You may have a point. Just let me think about it a moment...

Oh, no wait, it's all absolute bull. My mistake.
 
Nostradamus can be interpreted in such a way that he 'predicted' whatever the reader wants to read into it.
He was the ultimate astrology writer, vague and generalistic so that his prophecies can fit whatever one wants to see.
 
Oh good grief.

For God will take notice of the long barrenness of the great dame,
Diana's mother was 19 when she had her first child, 21 when she had her second, 23 when she had her third, 26 when she had her fourth (Diana), and 28 when she had her fifth.

who thereupon will conceive two principal children
She had five children.

But she will be in danger,
Nope. Died of natural causes aged 68.

and the female to whom she will have given birth will also, because of the temerity of the age, be in danger of death in her eighteenth year,
She had three daughters, none of whom appear to have had any significant problems at age 18

and will be unable to live beyond her thirty-sixth year.
A hit!

She will leave three males, and one female, and of these two will not have had the same father.
Diana had only two children, not four.

Even by the usual standards of Nostradamus' apologists, this is pathetic. And why on earth would he have been making predictions about British royalty who wouldn't be born for centuries to French royalty in the first place? The former aren't even the latter's descendants AFAIK.
 
Last edited:
Quote:
She will leave three males, and one female, and of these two will not have had the same father.
Diana had only two children, not four.

Even by the usual standards of Nostradamus' apologists, this is pathetic. And why on earth would he have been making predictions about British royalty who wouldn't be born for centuries to French royalty in the first place? The former aren't even the latter's descendants AFAIK.



Three males... and one Female.

The more important in this situation

Prince Harry, Prince Phillip, Charles, And the Queen herself.

The most immidiate family to the throne.
 
I suppose the real value from a "soothsayer" is to reap the benefits prior to the event not fitting the lock to the key retrospectively
 
who thereupon will conceive two principal children

Principal - arch, capital, cardinal, champion, chief, controlling, crowning, dominant, essential, first, foremost, greatest, head, highest, incomparable, key, leading, main, mainline, major, matchless, maximum, outstanding, paramount, peerless, predominant, preeminent, premier, prevailing, primary, prime, prominent, second-to-none, sovereign, star, stellar, strongest, supereminent, superior, supreme, transcendent, unapproachable, unequaled, unparalleled, unrivaled
 
Prince Harry the younger son will be the King of the Throne when Charles Passes. This is my Decipher.
 
who thereupon will conceive two principal children

Principal - arch, capital, cardinal, champion, chief, controlling, crowning, dominant, essential, first, foremost, greatest, head, highest, incomparable, key, leading, main, mainline, major, matchless, maximum, outstanding, paramount, peerless, predominant, preeminent, premier, prevailing, primary, prime, prominent, second-to-none, sovereign, star, stellar, strongest, supereminent, superior, supreme, transcendent, unapproachable, unequaled, unparalleled, unrivaled

Does principal mean all of that or just any of it?

I seem to be missing your point again. Feel free to clarify.
 
Does principal mean all of that or just any of it?

I seem to be missing your point again. Feel free to clarify.

Two principle Children. Prince Harry, prince william. Those who are to take heir of the throne...

Principle being the important word.
 
Two principle Children. Prince Harry, prince william. Those who are to take heir of the throne...
According to your 'decipher' it's Diana's mother who will have two principal children, after having been barren for a long time. She actually had five children (Diana, one that died and three others who seem equally uninteresting) between the ages of 19 and 28, so the very first line of this 'prophecy' tells us that whoever it's about, it certainly isn't about her and her children.
 
Two principle Children. Prince Harry, prince william. Those who are to take heir of the throne...

Principle being the important word.

The word you used was "principal" and you gave a long list of what appeared to be synonyms for it... And then you dodged my question about it. Care to explain?
 
According to your 'decipher' it's Diana's mother who will have two principal children, after having been barren for a long time. She actually had five children (Diana, one that died and three others who seem equally uninteresting) between the ages of 19 and 28, so the very first line of this 'prophecy' tells us that whoever it's about, it certainly isn't about her and her children.

Whats clear is the Death in the age. Im not to say I am correct about every word of this statement, but its evident of the apparent Age of Diana's Death. Thats Enough for me to beleive furthermore.
 
Three males... and one Female.

The more important in this situation

Prince Harry, Prince Phillip, Charles, And the Queen herself.

The most immidiate family to the throne.
It's actually not clear from the quoted 'prophecy' whether the 'she' that will leave three males and one female is the mother or the daughter, but it is clear from the reference to different fathers that it's children that's meant, not other members of the family. Diana's mother had three daughters and two sons (one of whom died at birth, leaving one male and three females) and Diana left two sons, so the verse can't be interpreted as applying to either of them.

ETA:

Whats clear is the Death in the age. Im not to say I am correct about every word of this statement, but its evident of the apparent Age of Diana's Death. Thats Enough for me to beleive furthermore.
If a single hit amongst a host of misses is enough to convince you of the accuracy of a prophecy then you are going to spend your whole life being wrong about absolutely everything.
 
Last edited:
Why would the death of Diana be important enough to warrant a prediction? It was very sad but it didn't change the world in any way. It didn't affect the amount of power held by the British royal family, it didn't start any wars, it didn't lead to a financial crisis or have any other major repercussions. It was just a private tragedy made public because the players were known.

I don't believe that Nostradamus ever truly predicted anything. The quatrains are all so vague that anything can be read in them. But if he did have some magic future-vision, why waste it on tabloid headline nonsense?
 
What about the rest of the letter. It goes on to say ...

... There will be great differences between the three brothers, and then there will be such great co-operation and agreement between them that the three and four parts of Europe will tremble. The youngest of them will sus- tain and augment the Christian monarchy, and under him sects will be elevated, and suddenly cast down, Arabs will be driven back, kingdoms united and new laws promulgated.

The oldest one will rule the land whose escutcheon is that of the furious crowned lions with their paws resting upon intrepid arms.

The one second in age, accompanied by the Latins, will penetrate far, until a second furious and trembling path has been beaten to the Great St. Bernard Pass. From there he will descend to mount the Pyrenees, which will not, however, be transferred to the French crown. And this third one will cause a great inundation of human blood, and for a long time Lent will not include March.


Is Harry going to march on the Pyreness?
 
Whats clear is the Death in the age. Im not to say I am correct about every word of this statement, but its evident of the apparent Age of Diana's Death. Thats Enough for me to beleive furthermore.

36 is the age that Marylin Monroe died. She was "perpetually dazzling" as well. This is obviously about her.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom