GOP candidate for NY Governor is a scumbag

[The Painter]

violent tendencies.

I don't know of any violence he has committed. Do you have evidence?

 

[Lurker]

This is true. The choice is, do you go with the scumbag that has been in politics all his life, or the scumbag that is a newcomer?

You use a false equivalence when you term them both "scumbag".

 

[Cleon]

I don't know of any violence he has committed. Do you have evidence?

I didn't accuse him of committing acts of violence. However, he did threaten a reporter. That's a violent tendency.

 

[The Painter]

No it's not. You have to commit violence to have violent tendencies. Threatening is just chest thumping.

 

[Cleon]

No it's not. You have to commit violence to have violent tendencies. Threatening is just chest thumping.

Well, if you say so.

 

[daredelvis]

Before all you (especially you out of staters) anoint him Saint Coumo you should do a little homework on the guy.

Quote:
When Com became HUD Secretary in 1997, he axed a federal program that had saved the U.S. $2.2 billion between 1994 and 1997 and reinstituted a system that lost the government money while earning billions for favored friends. He fired a former HUD official whose company designed the program.
Quote:
That wasn’t the only money big money lost. When Cuomo was secretary, HUD reported that $59 billion was missing! It couldn't’t say where they money went, because it failed to produce audited financial statements.
Quote:
As Secretary of HUD, Andrew Cuomo reversed the policy of selling defaulted mortgages so that families could keep their homes. Instead, he chose to foreclose on mortgages, which meant that families lost their homes and insiders cleaned up on fire-sale priced properties. The US Treasury also lost billions.

Now does he still sound like the solution to the problem or is he the problem?

It sounds like a bunch of un-cited accusations. I wonder why you did not link to them??? Afraid the source would not fly on a skeptics forum?

Daredelvis

 

[The Painter]

It sounds like a bunch of un-cited accusations. I wonder why you did not link to them??? Afraid the source would not fly on a skeptics forum?

Daredelvis

If I can google and yahoo, so can you. Do a little work. You'll see it's all true. Unless you are blinded by your partisanship. Let give you a push start;
Don't just look at the begining. There's more on him half way down

http://thekomisarscoop.com/2006/08/fees-for-our-friends-the-scandal-that-taints-andrew-cuomo/

 

[leftysergeant]

You still do not need a man in government with a rapist mentality. Disdain for women and minorities is an ego-driven thing, like rape.

 

[Thunder]

Paladino is a racist, who sends pornography and beastiality pictures over email, along with bigoted photos.

why the hell would anyone want such a man as governor????

 

[daredelvis]

If I can google and yahoo, so can you. Do a little work. You'll see it's all true. Unless you are blinded by your partisanship. Let give you a push start;
Don't just look at the begining. There's more on him half way down

http://thekomisarscoop.com/2006/08/fees-for-our-friends-the-scandal-that-taints-andrew-cuomo/

I googled one of your quotes, and came up with nothing. More than I should have done if you are too lazy to cite your quotes.

Daredelvis

 

[Donal]

If I can google and yahoo, so can you. Do a little work.

No. That is not how it works around here. You make the accusation, you back it up. You've been around long enough to know that

You'll see it's all true. Unless you are blinded by your partisanship.

I'm actually pretty conservative and think your posts are crap. It has nothing to do with partisanship. You're just doing a lousy job of presenting your case.

Let give you a push start;

Or you could, you know, back up all of your accusations.

Don't just look at the begining. There's more on him half way down

http://thekomisarscoop.com/2006/08/fees-for-our-friends-the-scandal-that-taints-andrew-cuomo/

Hey, look at that. You actually posted some supporting evidence. Did you hurt yourself?

 

[Thunder]

If I can google and yahoo, so can you. Do a little work. You'll see it's all true.

true skeptics...back-up their own accusations and claims.

 

[The Painter]

true skeptics...back-up their own accusations and claims.

Oh the no true Scotsman crap uh. BTW these are not "accusations" these are facts that have been around for a long time. If you chose to ignore them that's fine. They are still facts.

 

[johnny karate]

Oh the no true Scotsman crap uh. BTW these are not "accusations" these are facts that have been around for a long time. If you chose to ignore them that's fine. They are still facts.

So is the fact that Paladino is a racist, sexual pervert, and has serious anger control issues.

 

[The Painter]

Do you know the difference between subjective and objective???

 

[johnny karate]

Do you know the difference between subjective and objective???

Certainly.

Like for instance, the following are objective facts:

1) Carl Paladino finds blatant racism entertaining.

2) Carl Paladino finds graphic depictions of bestiality entertaining.

3) Carl Paladino threatens people he doesn't like with physical violence.

 

[Thunder]

1) Carl Paladino finds blatant racism entertaining.

2) Carl Paladino finds graphic depictions of bestiality entertaining.

3) Carl Paladino threatens people he doesn't like with physical violence.

yes, these are all FACTS.

and they make Paladino less than qualified to be a governor.

 

[Thunder]

Oh the no true Scotsman crap uh. BTW these are not "accusations" these are facts that have been around for a long time. If you chose to ignore them that's fine. They are still facts.

prove it.

here at JREF, we back up our claims and accusations.

if you cannot prove, or are unwilling to prove your claims, I suggest you either remove them, recant them, or find another forum that suits you better.

 

[daredelvis]

Oh the no true Scotsman crap uh. BTW these are not "accusations" these are facts that have been around for a long time. If you chose to ignore them that's fine. They are still facts.

Look, you had an equivalency to make, false as it may have been, but you should cite your sources. It is as simple as that.

Daredelvis

 

[Thunder]

what do you call someone who refuses to back up his claims?