Video Fakery in the 9/11 Attack

[Dave Rogers]

Yep, and downloading a copyrighted BitTorrent is a crime.

A cover-up of the faking of a terrorist attack that killed thousands is a sufficiently severe conspiracy to qualify for being an accessory after the fact. Why do truthers have no sense of proportion?

Dave

 

[W.D.Clinger]

And there's the point where you take leave of reality in order to convince yourself of an untenable hypothesis.

He had taken leave of reality long before that.

 

[Dave Rogers]

He had taken leave of reality long before that.

Sorry - another point where he takes leave of reality.

Dave

 

[DGM]

Sorry - another point where he takes leave of reality.

Dave

Yeah...I had to take leave of him when he started accusing friends of being "in on it".

 

[twinstead]

Folks. You can't debate crazy people. I keep forgetting that.

 

[Belz...]

And as for the towers, I have presented a hypothesis that they were built to collapse like they did.

That's a lot of "ifs" to support a conclusion you're yet to prove, isn't it ?

It's way simpler if you just assume that 19 terrorists rammed jets into the WTC towers for ideological, political and religious reasons. As a bonus, it even fits the evidence so you don't have to add major assumptions.

 

[Belz...]

A number of people working for them yes, but still very few people altogether. Why not use real planes? The people who planned the 9/11 attack operate based on zero risk. It would have been utterly crazy for them to hire some shaky maniacs who were willing to hijack airliners, train for piloting them, and then successfully crash them into the WTC towers. That's NOT zero risk, let me assure you.

Hoping that thousands of people who DIDN'T see planes will believe that they did based on what they see on television is zero risk ?

 

[Belz...]

I am having trouble determining if this thread is realistice or not.

 

[Bell]

I'll give you a clue: Here is George W. Bush telling thousands of people in positions of power that he is on their side and that the government and those he was addressing need to go along with the cover-up, and yes lie if need be: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-h4Zc57QKg

George W. Bush told a lot more. Read my signature.

 

[twinstead]

That's the whole problem with the 19 hijacker explanation: it's BORING. Space beams, holographs, exotic thermitic material, grand cover ups, now THAT'S excitement, baby. People like Anders and Jammonius are living the dream!

 

[BigAl]

Seconded

Thirded

 

[CompusMentus]

I submit that this thread is definitive proof of Poe's Law.

Compus

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

But the cover-up is not a conspiracy in the way I think of it. The cover-up HAD to be done by innocent people.

So that would mean that you are part of a cover-up since you're innocent yourself. Gotcha!

 

[danrush]

But what about the safety factors for buildings? Have you given up on that already?

And this massive interluken web of illuminadi got to every camera, every video camera, every digital camera and every media outlet on that day?

Explain in an organizational chart the construct and nature of this sinister organization please?

 

[MIKILLINI]

But the cover-up is not a conspiracy in the way I think of it. The cover-up HAD to be done by innocent people.

Cover up? You still assume the shadowy, unseen power in charge, inside jobby job. Well, I suppose you will always remain inside your own personal paranoia, considering the poor research skills you've displayed.
Grasping at straws and guessing will not get you separated from cognitive dissonance and comparisons of mommy bringing food to you in the basement.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So that would mean that you are part of a cover-up since you're innocent yourself. Gotcha!

That's flawed logic. That's like saying that all innocent people are religious.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

That's flawed logic. That's like saying that all innocent people are religious.

If it's "flawed logic", then mind if I ask: Why are you using the Truthers flawed logic as an excuse for everything?

You have to understand that Truthers hate reverse psychology.

 

[Anders Lindman]

And this massive interluken web of illuminadi got to every camera, every video camera, every digital camera and every media outlet on that day?

Explain in an organizational chart the construct and nature of this sinister organization please?

The second plane impact was only shown live by 5 large television networks or something like that. I believe the live video feeds went through a centralized media control center where they were delayed by about 5 seconds to allow for synchronization of crude computer graphics silhouettes of a plane inserted into them before they were sent to the television studios. No smaller television network showed the second plane impact live if I have understood it correctly.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

<snip>

.....synchronization of crude computer graphics silhouettes of a plane inserted into them before they were sent to the television studios.

<snip>

Did someone watch a little too much Star Trek when they were growing up?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Most conspiracy theory documentaries about the 9/11 attack talk about real planes hitting the WTC. Here is one exception, a video called September Clues. I have seen comments about this video having been debunked, anyway, it shows some of the arguments for why the planes may have been faked: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6407548186293238834