• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

NASA Engineer (ret.) is a Twoofie?

DGM said:
Yes I do have a better one. The CIT boys cherry picked the "evidence they wanted and the plane hit the Pentagon exactly where the evidence was found. Are you ready to start naming names of the people that were "in on it"? There's hundreds you know.
Click to expand...


There aren't hundreds - far from it, read the profound rebuttal to "Arabesque" i posted earlier - and the testimony is not cherry-picked, as you would know if you would have watched it.

Would you be so nice to quote my post #510, so we are sure that Mackey has read it? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
There aren't hundreds - far from it, read the profound rebuttal to "Arabesque" i posted earlier - and the testimony is not cherry-picked, as you would know if you would have watched it.

Would you be so nice to quote my post #510, so we are sure that Mackey has read it? Thanks.
Click to expand...
So name the names of the people that covered it up. You must know who they are, right? What are you waiting for? Don't forget everyone that was involved in the clean-up and the investigation afterward.
 
Childlike Empress said:
To recap: Mr. Deets expressed his general willingness to discuss a 9/11 topic with you in a moderated thread. I and others proposed topics, but as long as you are not willing to take it up, all proposals are moot. And you were silent so far.

We saw that Ron has tried to persuate you to do a Hardfire show with Balsamo since at least early 2009. Now that Deets showed up, your excuse that Balsamo isn't qualified (unlike Tony Szamboti) to take it up with the big NASA scientist that you are is invalid. As i saw when i read the first pages of this thread, Ron asked you again to take it up with Deets.

So wassup? Hardfire? Moderated thread? Or "nothing to debate"?
Click to expand...
All three; Deets has idiotic ideas, and he can't defend his lies with evidence. He is wrong, and you can't help him.

This is sad, you wait 9 years for Deets and all he has is the same old failed ideas.

Deets joined Balsamo, and Balsamo has 11.2G of failed math posted on the Internet. What will Deets do, another hockey stick 34g failed claim of stupid? The poor man, Deets, failed to research RADAR and the FDR to see his ideas on the Pentagon are moronic claptrap. You could have learned flying and physics in 9 years, taken a course in accident investigation and learned CIT are morons.

Deets like the fly over, the dumbest idea on 911, right there with DEW, and Nukes.
 
Last edited:
carlitos said:
Does anyone else find it ironic that a poster with the handle "Miragememories" dismisses all forensic, physical and documentary evidence based on the memory of a few eyewitnesses? Isn't the name itself an allusion to the common phenomenon of false memory?
Click to expand...
It is all talk based on your belief that this evidence actually exists.

MM
 
Because the witnesses are still there and they are the only source of independent evidence in a small pool of controlled and self-contradicting data, leaked by those who are suspects of the crime, murdered over a million civilians, ruined your health and brought us to the edge of WWIII right now.
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
Because the witnesses are still there and they are the only source of independent evidence in a small pool of controlled and self-contradicting data, leaked by those who are suspects of the crime, murdered over a million civilians, ruined your health and brought us to the edge of WWIII right now.
Click to expand...
Hearsay, lies, and fantasy. This is it, talk and more delusions. Even Paik points to the south flight path. With Deets, you guys will be okay. Deets stands up to any obstacle, any hardship and has evidence lies.
Where is Deets?




The Edge of WWIII. The leading edge or trailing edge? Does the edge have le slats? Ruined my health?
Don't worry, Deets is here!
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
Because the witnesses are still there and they are the only source of independent evidence in a small pool of controlled and self-contradicting data, leaked by those who are suspects of the crime, murdered over a million civilians, ruined your health and brought us to the edge of WWIII right now.
Click to expand...

So it really has nothing to do with the evidence, you're obviously only are a truther for political reasons. We knew that.
 
There's nothing we can do for them, they've got their world wrapped up in one big circular loop.

The evidence doesn't fit they're worldview, so therefore the evidence was planted. Oh... and because of the war in Iraq, for some reason.
 
Childlike Empress said:
What? Why must i know?
Click to expand...
Because your arguing that all this evidence is fake or planted, Is this just a hunch or do you actually have evidence to support this? If so you do know your implicating a lot of people. Are you ready to do this or is this all just a "feeling"?

Don't you think it's time to name names and get off the pot?
 
DGM said:
Because your arguing that all this evidence is fake or planted, Is this just a hunch or do you actually have evidence to support this?
Click to expand...

Because America is capitalist and the war in Iraq killed people silly!

Don't you get it? Don't you see the Big Picture, the Master Plan at work? People like Childlike who are "in the know", they've got everything covered. They get it. They're special. They can read between the lines and see history for what it really is. Boy am I envious of them. To have such clarity of thought, such insight into complex world events. It must be something to be like them, to see things that are not there so clearly.
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Because your arguing that all this evidence is fake or planted, Is this just a hunch or do you actually have evidence to support this? If so you do know your implicating a lot of people. Are you ready to do this or is this all just a "feeling"?

Don't you think it's time to name names and get off the pot?
Click to expand...


You are denying evidence. I told you before that there is a theoretical possibility that the witnesses are in on it. Take it up with Lagasse, Brooks and the rest of it.
 
Childlike Empress said:
You are denying evidence. I told you before that there is a theoretical possibility that the witnesses are in on it. Take it up with Lagasse, Brooks and the rest of it.
Click to expand...

Says the person who claims that the evidence supporting what really happened is planted. You and MM are the ones who deny evidence.
 
Childlike Empress said:
You are denying evidence. I told you before that there is a theoretical possibility that the witnesses are in on it. Take it up with Lagasse, Brooks and the rest of it.
Click to expand...

Are you going to contact the forensic labs that have analyzed the DNA evidence, the first responders that recovered the body parts, or are are you just going to dismiss them as just Evil American Capitalists and by default part of the conspiracy?
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
What is the conclusion CIT draws from the evidence they obtained? Do you have a better one? Where's Max Photon when you need him? A military deception. It's inherently logical that those people think they saw the plane hit. The deception worked.

Just like they didn't have to stage WMD in Iraq. Putin says he would have found some, but the russian people are well educated in critical thinking.
Click to expand...

So you mean to tell me it is more likely for witnesses to be deceived in witnessing a plane hit than it is for witnesses to be mistaken in the description of where a plane moving at high speed was coming from?
 
Pardalis said:
Are you going to contact the forensic labs that have analyzed the DNA evidence, the first responders that recovered the body parts, or are are you just going to dismiss them as just Evil American Capitalists and by default part of the conspiracy?
Click to expand...


None of the above. Are you going to make yourself familiar with the crucial eyewitness testimonies or are you going to continue to try your pathetic little blame game?
 
Garb said:
So you mean to tell me it is more likely for witnesses to be deceived in witnessing a plane hit than it is for witnesses to be mistaken in the description of where a plane moving at high speed was coming from?
Click to expand...


Did you manage to watch "NSA" (i gave you the link yesterday)? Do you think it is rational to assume that the group of witnesses were "mistaken" in their corroborated testimony?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom