NASA Engineer (ret.) is a Twoofie?

[Childlike Empress]

Or they're MISTAKEN.

Look it up, it's a nice little word. People get things wrong all the time. It's far more believable and banal than to plant evidence in plain sight.

No they aren't mistaken. You don't know what you are talking about. Make yourself familiar with the evidence or don't comment on it.

 

[Pardalis]

Are you suggesting it is illogical?

I'm not only saying it's illogical, it's also insane.

No they aren't mistaken.

And what about the forensic labs that analyzed the DNA of the passengers found at the site? Are they lying, mistaken or correct?

 

[The Big Dog]

When you run out of lies, accusations and mockery, you request speculation.

Why do you ask for speculation?

So you can justify more lies, accusations and mockery.

MM

Wow, MM with the feigned outrage, NICE.

Anyway, you want to talk about lies, accusations and mockery, champ? That is the freaking CIT's stock in trade.

We've already talked about Lloyde England, who do we go to next? Father McGraw? Naw, too easy. Frank Probst? Hell, CIT, when they do acknowledge him, they call him a liar.

I know! Madlene Zakhem, the south-path testifying "Crypto-Jew" (their characterization). Buffet Slayer, the floor is yours:

"Is Madlene merely an opportunist who wanted attention for what she claimed was a traumatic event? Was Madlene drastically mistaken? Unlikely. Or is Madlene an operative of some sort?

I have made comments about her jewish sounding last name and possible Israeli accent. Is there a possibility she is Mossad? Perhaps. But one thing is for sure. She certainly was not telling the truth about what she saw on 9/11."

Mr. Deets, you sure hitched your wagon to some superstars!!

/Nice, MM claims we are "bigots," at the same time I am dredging up one of Aldo's anti-semitic rants! Great timing MM!

 

[Childlike Empress]

Seriously? You do know that the CIT's videos are grossly misleading and contradictory, don't you? I mean the fact that they put Paik out in the street when he was actually in the building? the fact that Paik and Morin are confirmed SOC witnesses, the fact that they are all impact witnesses.

We can go on and on and on, but you just keep on plucking that No Planer chicken, darling.

Your opinions are based on the TruthSims pseudo-debunking which we went over already. It's nonsense. You are still not able to name one single SoC witness that was in a position to judge and went on record. All you are doing with your Ranke photoshops and childish insults is trying to keep people away from watching the interviews for themselves. It's not working, in fact its massively backfiring as numerous formerly respected (also my me) "truther personalities" have burned themselves already. Good for you that you don't have any credibility to loose.

 

[Miragememories]

And eyewitnesses are known to be wrong, and increasingly so as the years go by..

Or they're MISTAKEN.

Look it up, it's a nice little word. People get things wrong all the time. It's far more believable and banal than to plant evidence in plain sight.

Eyewitnesses have the greatest difficulty identifying people in a police lineup.

Have you seen the Citgo setting?

You look north, one view.

You turn 180 degrees and look south, a completely different view.

Now it is 9/11.

A day that only the brain dead could forget.

You are at the CItgo gas station.

You hear the loud roar of a Boeing 767 approaching at high speed and very low altitude.

You look to the north and this dramatic vision of this close up fly by is permanently etched in your memory.

A second later a huge conflagration occurs at the Pentagon.

Years later, someone suggests that you and 9 others were not likely
to remember such an event very well.

I still remember exactly where I was the day JFK was assassinated!

You sir are afraid of the truth and deep in denial!

MM

 

[Pardalis]

A second later a huge conflagration occurs at the Pentagon.

Yes, if I remember correctly an airplane filled with passengers crashed there.

 

[beachnut]

When you run out of lies, accusations and mockery, you request speculation.

Why do you ask for speculation?

So you can justify more lies, accusations and mockery.

MM

The FDR proves your ideas are wrong.

RADAR proves your ideas are wrong.

CIT witnesses on video pointing south prove you don't know directions. They prove you wrong.

You guys spew so much nonsense and moronic lies, there is no need to mock you! Your posts do it for you.

What lies have I posted? none; no big list yet MM? lol

I posted the FDR refutes you! FACT
I posted RADAR refutes you! FACT

You call facts lie, what is new.

 

[Miragememories]

And what about the forensic labs that analyzed the DNA of the passengers found at the site? Are they lying, mistaken or correct?

What part of "planted evidence" did you not understand?

Yes it was insane.

But the insanity was not mine.

MM

 

[Miragememories]

What lies have I posted? none; no big list yet MM? lol

Your nonstop unsubstantiated accusations are lies.

MM

 

[T.A.M.]

Truthers are more interesting in real dialogue than prima donna posturing.

How difficult is it to answer the man's question?

Apparently very difficult.

MM

Yes just like the snake oil salesman is much more in his own atop his soapbox selling his crap, then having to give a dissertation on his product to professionals...I totally understand what you are saying.

TAM

 

[Pardalis]

What part of "planted evidence" did you not understand?

And what part of "what evidence do you have it was planted" don't you understand?

I mean real positive evidence, not evidence out of fallacy and ignorance.

 

[Disbelief]

Exactly my point.

Therefore, any physical evidence supporting a known-to-be-false, south of Citgo flightpath, should not be there.

The only logical explanation is that the contradictory evidence must be planted evidence.

MM

This ranks up there with the dumbest TM theories ever. (1) The plane, the DNA, the FDR, the CVR, etc were planted or (2) some witnesses were mistaken (led by the interviewer). Only in truther land is option 1 more likely.

 

[Childlike Empress]

And what about the forensic labs that analyzed the DNA of the passengers found at the site? Are they lying, mistaken or correct?

Something definitely doesn't add up, Pardalis. Are the witnesses lying? You would be the second person behind that theory. For me, they are extremely credible. Random everyday people just happening to work on scene, telling what they saw without realizing the implications. Watch their testimony or spare me a reply, please.

 

[Pardalis]

Something definitely doesn't add up, Pardalis. Are the witnesses lying?

NO.

For me, they are extremely credible.

That's your problem. You want them to be credible because you want this to be a US conspiracy.

BTW, you dodged the question about the DNA. Pesky little DNA, it just won't go away won't it?

 

[T.A.M.]

No they aren't mistaken. You don't know what you are talking about. Make yourself familiar with the evidence or don't comment on it.

Stop telling others what to do CLE. Since when did you run this forum, or this thread.

Learn your place fellow JREFer.

TAM

 

[carlitos]

massive backfiring

Their global share of internet traffic has soared from seven one hundred thousandths of a percent of net users to ... seven one hundred thousandths of a percent.

Alexa traffic rank for citizeninvestigationteam.com:
- - - - Traffic Rank- Change
1 month 1,809,670 -501,349
3 month 1,722,940 -2,082,512

Percent of global pageviews on citizeninvestigationteam.com:
Pageviews Change
1 month - - We do not have enough data to display this metric for this site.
3 month - - We do not have enough data to display this metric for this site.

Percent of global Internet users who visit citizeninvestigationteam.com:
- - - - Reach - - Change
1 month 0.00007 +50%
3 month 0.00007 +140%

The percentage of visits to citizeninvestigationteam.com that consist of a single pageview:
- - - --- -Bounce % Change
1 month 45.50000 -18%
3 month 41.90000 -34%

Daily pageviews per user for citizeninvestigationteam.com:
Pageviews/User Change
1 month 2.30000 -30%
3 month 3.30000 +110%

Daily time on site for citizeninvestigationteam.com:
Time on Site Change
1 month 2.80833 -39%
3 month 3.48167 +13%

The percentage of visits to citizeninvestigationteam.com that came from a search engine:
Search % Change
1 month 18.20000 - We do not have enough data to display this metric for this site.
3 month 6.50000 -29%

​

 

[T.A.M.]

Something definitely doesn't add up, Pardalis. Are the witnesses lying? You would be the second person behind that theory. For me, they are extremely credible. Random everyday people just happening to work on scene, telling what they saw without realizing the implications. Watch their testimony or spare me a reply, please.

Nope...the witnesses are misremembering. Not surprised. The only thing I would take as likely true from any of the witnesses at this point, is whether they saw the plane actually hit the pentagon. All else would be to subtle, to brief, and too long gone in the past to remember anything close to accurately.

And...Ranke talking point in 3....2....1....

TAM

 

[The Big Dog]

Your opinions are based on the TruthSims pseudo-debunking which we went over already. It's nonsense. You are still not able to name one single SoC witness that was in a position to judge and went on record. All you are doing with your Ranke photoshops and childish insults is trying to keep people away from watching the interviews for themselves. It's not working, in fact its massively backfiring as numerous formerly respected (also my me) "truther personalities" have burned themselves already. Good for you that you don't have any credibility to loose.

Frank Probst. Go CE, go like the wind. Go run to the tree fort and come back and tell Mr. Deets that Probst was lying.

Next, what "record." All I have is the crap the tree fort twins threw together. I asked for the raw video years ago. Where is it, CE? Tell the mutts to torrent it, or to STFU.

/by the way, CE, you said I had not named one single SOC witness. You are indeed correct, I had named two, both of which you ignored. You are quite the truther personality!

 

[The Big Dog]

Something definitely doesn't add up, Pardalis. Are the witnesses lying? You would be the second person behind that theory. For me, they are extremely credible. Random everyday people just happening to work on scene, telling what they saw without realizing the implications. Watch their testimony or spare me a reply, please.

Gee, I have posted two witnesses that Fat Aldo claims are lying, Lloyde and Madlene Zakhem. When you see what they say about Probst (which ain't much) that will be three. And then we'll go through Arabesque's whole freaking list.

Great crowd you got mixed up with Mr. Deets!

 

[Childlike Empress]

Have you seen the Citgo setting?

You look north, one view.

You turn 180 degrees and look south, a completely different view.

Exactly. That's why the demands and insinuations that CIT hasn't published "the full" interviews fall flat on their face. What is supposed to be hidden? Paik turning 180 degrees around and saying "just joking, the plane flew over there"? Ridiculous.