Deets says;
The airplane was UA175, a Boeing 767-200, shortly before crashing into World Trade Center Tower 2. Based on analysis of radar data, the National Transportation and Safety Board reported the groundspeed just before impact as 510 knots. This is well beyond the maximum operating velocity of 360 knots, and maximum dive velocity of 410 knots. The possibilities as I see them are: (1) this wasn’t a standard 767-200; (2) the radar data was compromised in some manner; (3) the NTSB analysis was erroneous; or (4) the 767 flew well beyond its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively small target. Which organization has the greater responsibility for acknowledging the elephant in the room? The NTSB, NASA, Boeing, or the AIAA? Have engineers authored papers, but the AIAA or NASA won’t publish them? Or, does the ethical responsibility lie not with organizations, but with individual aeronautical engineers? Have engineers just looked the other way?
(1) this wasn’t a standard 767-200;
Wrong, it was, it was Flight 175 it was proved by the same RADAR used by 911 truth. RADAR verified it was a standard 767. Wrong on this one due to evidence.
(2) the radar data was compromised in some manner;
A made up conclusion based on nothing; you have no evidene.
(3) the NTSB analysis was erroneous;
Wrong again, how can it be wrong? No evidence for this one.
(4) the 767 flew well beyond its flight envelope, was controllable, and managed to hit a relatively small target.
Small target? 207 feet wide, some runways are 150 feet wide and the pilot puts the aircraft exactly on centerline, inches to centerline. This is what happen, but the target was a BIG building bigger than a 40 foot wide runway. Pilots have to hit a window a few feet in size to land on target, and here we have a target 1300 feet tall. Small? lol
No one looked the other way, Flight 175 impacted the WTC at a speed of 560 to 590 mph.
Pilots hit buildings, these terrorists took the time to get FAA certified to fly. The terrorists took years to learn flying, you spent zero time researching 911 to check your own opinions.
You implied it was not possible, but the evidence shows it happened. Video is real, Flight 175 is real, the passengers deaths were real. What do you have?
You have membership in p4t, the 11.2g failed physics of Balsamo, the not an airline captain want to be failed organization of pilots with nut case ideas on 911. lol
A member of p4t is going to school us on airspeed of 175, a fact in evidence. The elephant in the room?
Dwain Deets Endorses CIT and National Security Alert - enough said. Kind of debunks his ideas on 911 all in one swift act of anti-intellectual failure, endorsing the worse investigators in the universe.
Does he understand he can post his nonsense and not respond to questions? He has not presented evidence in his on-line 911 truth statements, it is all BS talk based on some bias.
Too many years as chief of sections to handle disagreement and truth. He actually says nothing; like Balsamo, he implies idiotic delusions but can't back them up.
What will he make up for Flights 11, 77, and 93? Will there be the insanity of thermite thrown in?
