Wooah wooah back up. The rifle did not have Oswald's fingerprints on. There no need to lie. If you want to accept the latter day evidence of LN researchers who used photos then fine, but then you also have to accept that Mac Wallace was in the snipers nest too. The rifle was dusted on the 22nd. Nothing was found on it. Several days later, after Oswald was dead, a partial palm print was found on it.
For god's sake, do you understand how investigations work? This is such a ridiculous, trivial bunch of crap. The palm print was identified as Oswald's some days later, but it was taken before the rifle was turned over to the FBI by Lt. Day. He was told not to complete the investigation, but he had Oswald's print of file, so he made the connection.
As explained several times, your pyscial evidence has completely fallen apart. You can't prove any of these things you say, you clearly don't have a grasp of the case because you keep saying things that are not true, and you're obviously just cutting and pasting everything from Bugliosi and macadams. Try expanding your horizons a little bit.
You've
said it's fallen apart, but all you have are spurious gripes about postal regulations and mangled witness accounts.
And after launching the idiot-genius theory of conspiracy, now we get the ad hominem against people providing solid evidence. Now you're doing the equivalent of bitching about NIST, "You
trust the government."
These are old, tired tactics and even as an attempt to distract from the TOTAL LACK OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE indicating any scenario other than Oswald as the lone gunman, they fail.
If you're so certain, then you should be able to explain in detail on a subject by subject basis why you come to your conclusions. So Oswald fired a rifle that day did he? Whats the physical evidence for that then?
Again: video evidence shows bullets came from behind. The wounds can only be explained by a bullet coming from above and behind. The car was damaged in such a way and the blood spatter additionally indicated that the bullets came from above and behind.
Guess what's above and behind? A rifle and shell casings that match the bullets and fragments recovered that just happens to have a palm print from Lee Harvey Oswald, who, coincidentally, I'm sure, ordered that very rifle with an alias he consistently used and the forms were filled out in his handwriting.
And on top of that, THERE'S NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE SUGGESTING ANY OTHER SCENARIO.
CE399 was fired at Kennedy and did those wounds did it? Whats the physical evidence for that then?
The fact that the fragments in Connally match the chemical composition of the bullet. The fact that it was recovered from Connally's gurney (You still haven't explained how the bullet being found as it was would support any conspiracy theory). The fact that it was fired from the rifle that had Oswald's palm print on it that he ordered and had pictures of that were matched to a camera he owned.
You haven't got any physical evidence for those things, and the more you look at each aspect of your case, the more obvious these hard facts you trumpet are in fact circular and circumstantial.
You've assumed a conspiracy, without ever explaining what you think happened, and are randomly dismissing facts to suit that inchoate and infantile position.
You've wholly failed to dismiss any evidence suggesting it was Oswald and you've produced exactly zero to support any other scenario.
You're just JAQing it. A sweaty, furious, shameful JAQ session.
