• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Video Fakery in the 9/11 Attack

Anders Lindman said:
I checked if there was a connection between the 5 seconds of missing plane and the 5 seconds time difference between the official report and seismic data, but there seems to be no apparent connection. However, the paper says that it was real-time insertion of computer graphics. I claim that the live video feeds were delayed by 5 seconds to allow for synchronization of the fireball explosion with the inserted computer graphics plane.
Click to expand...
The no plane morons has to delusional enough to ignore RADAR data which proves each plane, Flight 11 and Flight 175, impacted the WTC towers. Then you have the people killed. What moron makes up lies like no planes. How can they be that stupid? Why causes that kind of mental illness? Why do you post this insanity? What is your take on what it takes to be so delusional, you make up or believe the idiotic lies you found and posted?
 
beachnut said:
The no plane morons has to delusional enough to ignore RADAR data which proves each plane, Flight 11 and Flight 175, impacted the WTC towers. Then you have the people killed. What moron makes up lies like no planes. How can they be that stupid? Why causes that kind of mental illness? Why do you post this insanity? What is your take on what it takes to be so delusional, you make up or believe the idiotic lies you found and posted?
Click to expand...

If there were no planes, then there were no passengers that could have been killed. I have hardly researched the passenger lists at all. If it was video fakery, then the passenger lists must have been faked too. Someone else must have researched that extensively. I will not research it.
 
fitzgibbon said:
Wonder what's going to happen to Ace's 'theory' once he has access to hi-res footage that won't display the same low-res artifacts that he's been basing his 'theory' on for so long? Think he'll admit his idiocy? Probably not.

I mean, he's still clueless after all this time why there wasn't an Avid involved in any of his beloved alleged 'compositing'.
Click to expand...

No, then he will simply claim that in the time between 2001 and now the technology for CGI has advanced so the high res footage can be faked without anyone able to tell.

TAM:)
 
Anders Lindman said:
If there were no planes, then there were no passengers that could have been killed. I have hardly researched the passenger lists at all. If it was video fakery, then the passenger lists must have been faked too. Someone else must have researched that extensively. I will not research it.
Click to expand...

In your paranoid, uneducated biased opinion, was there any evidence that wasnt faked or planted?

TAM:)
 
pict1.jpg


vs no planer explanation for plane debris:

JetHorse-1.jpg


Appropriate reaction to no-planer nonsense:

doglaugh.gif
 
Big "If"

Anders Lindman said:
If there were no planes, then there were no passengers that could have been killed. I have hardly researched the passenger lists at all. If it was video fakery, then the passenger lists must have been faked too. Someone else must have researched that extensively.
Click to expand...

I highlighted the problem with your post.

I will not research it.
Click to expand...
Good choice. Do something productive instead.
 
Anders Lindman said:
If there were no planes, then there were no passengers that could have been killed. I have hardly researched the passenger lists at all. If it was video fakery, then the passenger lists must have been faked too. Someone else must have researched that extensively. I will not research it.
Click to expand...

I refuse to research this, but I know that you are faked. You do not exist.

End of story.:p
 
Anders Lindman said:
If there were no planes, then there were no passengers that could have been killed. I have hardly researched the passenger lists at all. If it was video fakery, then the passenger lists must have been faked too. Someone else must have researched that extensively. I will not research it.
Click to expand...

Why not research it? You could always come to the conslussion that planes were indeed used & the Family Members were in contact with their loved ones on the flights. You just have to make a decision to keep going on with those stupid Truther websites or look at debunker websites that will "free your mind".
 
Anders Lindman said:
If there were no planes, then there were no passengers that could have been killed.
Click to expand...

Then how did my work-mate who was last seen boarding Flight 93 in Newark wind up dead in the debris pile of Flight 93 in Shanksville?
 
Anders, why did the firemen looked up when AA11 screamed overhead and why did Jules point his camera towards the plane? Why did Chief Pfeifer report to dispatch that a plane had crashed into World Trade Center?
 
Thunder said:
no planes, huh?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=492&pictureid=3731[/qimg]
Click to expand...

The no-plane theory is idiocy as far as WTC is concerned.

The Pentagon is a different matter altogether.
Fresh from Bollyns site, newly released video showing a cruise missile hitting the Pentagon. Could be fake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeLcE0sht-M&feature=player_embedded

In a new major development, one of the 3 big German weekly's Focus came with a 9/11 article highly sceptical of the official story:

http://www.focus.de/finanzen/news/11-september-2001-tathergang_aid_549653.html
 
Last edited:
Bell said:
Anders, why did the firemen looked up when AA11 screamed overhead and why did Jules point his camera towards the plane? Why did Chief Pfeifer report to dispatch that a plane had crashed into World Trade Center?
Click to expand...

Why didn't the man in the white uniform react to a roaring jet flying over them at very low altitude and incredible speed?

95680511.jpg
 
9/11-investigator said:
The no-plane theory is idiocy as far as WTC is concerned.

The Pentagon is a different matter altogether.
Fresh from Bollyns site, newly released video showing a cruise missile hitting the Pentagon. Could be fake.
Click to expand...

Consider anything Bollyn or anyone else says in the light of the fact that essentially the entire Flight 77 airplane and the remains of all occupants was recovered inside the pentagon and witnessed by hundreds of eyewitnesses.
 
9/11-investigator said:
The no-plane theory is idiocy as far as WTC is concerned.

The Pentagon is a different matter altogether.
Fresh from Bollyns site, newly released video showing a cruise missile hitting the Pentagon. Could be fake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeLcE0sht-M&feature=player_embedded

In a new major development, one of the 3 big German weekly's Focus came with a 9/11 article highly sceptical of the official story:

http://www.focus.de/finanzen/news/11-september-2001-tathergang_aid_549653.html
Click to expand...

No it wasn't faked, it was a missile that sped up and slowed down 3 times in the 2-3 seconds it was on screen prior to "hitting the pentagon".

Gotta get me some of those missiles.

That is the worst fakery I have seen...EVER in trutherville.

TAM:)
 
Anders Lindman said:
Why didn't the man in the white uniform react to a roaring jet flying over them at very low altitude and incredible speed?

[qimg]http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/3331/95680511.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Why did everybody else react?

Anyway, all the info you need is on this video. Watch it 100 times. Don't watch Unsecured Coins video - it's polluted by logic and facts, things that are harmful to your brain.:D

 
thecritta said:
omg not another no planer, you are just making the truth movement look bad so why dont you quit with the TV Fakery and no planes stuff i hate no plane people it is just so annoying that theory. Stop making the movement look bad plz.
Click to expand...

Why don't you quit the truth movement and join the look-good movement?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom