Controlled demolition vs. the towers collapsing

ergo said:
So, regarding these "explosive" "fireballs" that supposedly wrinkled up a 300-pound steel and concrete fire door in the basement, do we have any intelligent account as to how these fireballs would occur, down which fire-protected elevator shafts or some other mysterious shaft? And why they would have been so selective in their damage, i.e., hitting some of the basement floors, but not all of them, completely blowing out the lobbies but hitting no other floors above? And completely ignoring the stairwell? Has there been any intelligent theory outlined about this?

Just curious.
Click to expand...
Yes.
 
Anders Lindman said:
The buildings must have been designed to withstand decades if not centuries of aging, severe hurricanes and even minor earthquakes. This means that they must have been designed for that, roughly 5 times the needed strength. Or something like that.
Click to expand...

Sorry to press you on this, but it is central to your assumption and assertions.

On what basis do you believe that a safety factor of 5 is required to deal with hurricanes and earthquakes? What is the basis for your assumptions regarding design life? Have you had reference to, for example, and of the design codes applicable either then or at the present time?

I have heard that the general factor is 10 times the needed strength. But I don't know if it applies to buildings of all kinds. Maybe it was for bridges or something like that.
Click to expand...

I'm afraid you are mistaken.
 
Last edited:
Disbelief said:
I am not here to do your work for you, you tried this in your past incarnations as well. You made a claim, you provide the proof.
Click to expand...

No thanks. It's obvious there were numerous reports of explosions or the sounds of explosions, as well as injuries from. That means that there were explosions. Thus it's already been shown many times over that Big Al's statement is incorrect. Not surprising. Besides, I doubt you're worth wasting that kind of time on.
 
Bell said:
So your judgement is as good as those of the people who studied and worked in the appropriate professions for years?
Click to expand...

I fear we're headed in that direction, yes, but let's give the chap a chance to speak for himself.
 
ergo said:
So, regarding these "explosive" "fireballs" that supposedly wrinkled up a 300-pound steel and concrete fire door in the basement, do we have any intelligent account as to how these fireballs would occur, down which fire-protected elevator shafts or some other mysterious shaft? And why they would have been so selective in their damage, i.e., hitting some of the basement floors, but not all of them, completely blowing out the lobbies but hitting no other floors above? And completely ignoring the stairwell? Has there been any intelligent theory outlined about this?
Click to expand...

DGM said:
Yes.
Click to expand...

Yes? But you can't actually point to anything?
 
ergo said:
Yes? But you can't actually point to anything?
Click to expand...
Sure I can. I was just wondering after all these years you would still be asking this. I thought you researched this subject. Stop being so freaking lazy.


Hint: Like "truther" Willy Rodrique's said the "fireball came down the freight elevator".
 
AaronMHatch said:
Non sequitur for CD.
Click to expand...

Do you know what a non sequitur is? A non sequitur would have meant I made this statement:


ergo said:
That means that there were explosions.
Click to expand...


without this one preceding it:

ergo said:
There were numerous reports of explosions or the sounds of explosions, as well as injuries from.
Click to expand...


Non sequiturs aren't simply created because "debunkers" take a sentence out of its paragraph.
 
Disbelief said:
I am not here to do your work for you, you tried this in your past incarnations as well. You made a claim, you provide the proof.
Click to expand...

ergo said:
No thanks. It's obvious there were numerous reports of explosions or the sounds of explosions, as well as injuries from. That means that there were explosions. Thus it's already been shown many times over that Big Al's statement is incorrect. Not surprising. Besides, I doubt you're worth wasting that kind of time on.
Click to expand...

Just say you can't, because that is plainly obvious. The only account about 1993 had no comparison to the sound of the bomb. As for the injuries, you have been shown to be wrong about that as well.
 
DGM said:
Hint: Like "truther" Willy Rodrique's said the "fireball came down the freight elevator".
Click to expand...

That's the theory?

No, I don't think there has been any intelligent analysis of this alleged fireball or why it would be so selective in its damage.
 
ergo said:
Do you know what a non sequitur is?
Click to expand...

It's a non sequitur for you to think there was a controlled demolition just because there might have been explosions.

For you to prove there were explosions means nothing in a situation where two skyscrapers collapsed.
 
ergo said:
Really? There were no injuries from the explosions in the basements? Please provide evidence for this claim.
Click to expand...

Your reading comprehension still blows, no matter what your screen name happens to be. No injuries from the type of explosions you claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom