• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Invitation to Derek Johnson to discuss his ideas

bill smith said:
The interesting thing is that many of them admit that WTC7 LOOKED like a controlled demolition in the videos. And they will also agree that WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition after it was demolished (see photos)

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8607/wtc7controlleddemolitiohq3.jpg WTC7 Before
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/wtc-gallery/wtc-rescuer/wtc7-1.JPG WTC7 after

But amazingly they will tell you that despite all this visible evidence twith which they agree that WTC7 was demolished that it was NOT a controlled demolition. I kid you not----ask them .
Click to expand...

Can you tell him, too, why we say it looks like a CD?


Hey P4T, bill knows our reasons, I kid you not! :)
 
Miragememories said:
A ceramic collar could be used to contain a thermite reaction with a column.

....

Add to that, the fact that iron workers and fire fighters would not be looking for such evidence.
Click to expand...

Right. They might mistake them for toilet bowls. Ditto the office workers, saying "Hey! Toilet bowls sticking out of the wall! How cool is that. So handy."

You have hit a new low of stupidosity.

In your own terms this still wouldn't work, as the moment the thermy-stuff ate away a 1/2" of steel it would pour down the gap that has been produced.

MM - try to be a little more self-censoring. Try to spot your own idiocy in advance. Or just go on entertaining us. Either way is good in the end, I suppose.
 
bill smith said:
I have clear cut statements Oystein . Would you like me to post them ?
Click to expand...
Why are you off topic? Why do you post clear cut delusions? Why can't you find lies in Derek's presentation? How are you able to post only nonsense, lies and delusions? What tools do you have to fail so consistently?

911 truth has failed for 9 years to present reality based evidence, and you continue to demonstrate how that is possible.


Your moronic claims are due to the fact, CD looks like gravity collapse. Your failure to understand and comprehend physics and engineering could be a major reason why you are so gullible spewing nonsense you found from a group of liars dumber than dirt.

The primary energy source in CD is gravity, his is why CD looks like a gravity collapse; Gravity. You fail to comprehend science; why? You settle for 9 years of failure, and keep posting idiotic tripe; why?

Does this mean you can't explain why Derek lies in his presentations? Oops, I forgot, you and Derek are engineering experts who don't do questions.
 
bill smith said:
The interesting thing is that many of them admit that WTC7 LOOKED like a controlled demolition in the videos. And they will also agree that WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition after it was demolished.
Click to expand...

Well, of course WTC 7 did. The towers didn't.

See, the thing is that controlled demolition works by breaking just what it takes to make the building fall in on itself.

In the case of WTC 7, there were only a couple things that you could break to do that.

And that is exactly where the fires and projectiles from the north tower did their thing.

There just wasn't any other way that it could have fallen.
 
To me it resemble CD in its general downward direction of collapse.
It does not have to be CD to do that. :D
 
leftysergeant said:
Well, of course WTC 7 did. The towers didn't.

See, the thing is that controlled demolition works by breaking just what it takes to make the building fall in on itself.

In the case of WTC 7, there were only a couple things that you could break to do that.

And that is exactly where the fires and projectiles from the north tower did their thing.

There just wasn't any other way that it could have fallen.
Click to expand...

You mean it couldn't have fallen like this ? It had a steel frame too..but maybe it would have been too tall ?

http://www.inewscatcher.com/2009/08/building-implosion-gone-wrong-turkey.html


'If there is a problem with WTC7 there is a problem with the whole 9/11 official story'
 
GlennB said:
"In your own terms this still wouldn't work, as the moment the thermy-stuff ate away a 1/2" of steel it would pour down the gap that has been produced."
Click to expand...
What gap?

Once the thermite began to react against the steel, it would find steel in front and below it.

What makes you believe that the reaction would stop and that all the unreacted thermite would drop through a gap in the collar.

Another unsubstantiated assumption.

MM
 
DGM said:
Where did you get that? :confused:


He was suggesting you test your "theory". Is that a problem?
Click to expand...
Did the NIST test there fracking theory?

And their Collapse A Tower video game doesn't count.

Do I have the resources that the NIST have access to?

Duh.

MM
 
Miragememories said:
Did the NIST test there fracking theory?

And their Collapse A Tower video game doesn't count.

Do I have the resources that the NIST have access to?

Duh.

MM
Click to expand...
The "truth" movement doesn't have the resources to build a simple experiment but they can go on world tours?

I won't comment on NIST testing their theory considering you don't believe in computer modeling. I also won't bring up the fire test and things.


:rolleyes:
 
of course the Truth movement has resources
they are developing confidential military grade explosives as we speak
 
DGM said:
The "truth" movement doesn't have the resources to build a simple experiment but they can go on world tours?

I won't comment on NIST testing their theory considering you don't believe in computer modeling. I also won't bring up the fire test and things.


:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

There will be no kitchen table judgement on a world scale if we do not bring the Truth about 9/11 to the World DGM. So that money is very well spent.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5652298545742902173&hl=es

We would never have the resources to build the high tech mills that can produce the nanoparticles that are so small that they can enter the human cell. Only the taxpayer can afford such esoteric technologies. Or should I say those who spend the taxpayer's money.
 
Last edited:
Patriots4Truth said:
It's so big that they must be making 1/100,000th of what Silverstein made
Click to expand...

Just in case you're still not clear about this, Silverstein actually lost money from 9/11, making this comment of yours rather dumb. It's just another twoofer talking point. For someone new to this whole 9/11 conspiracy thing, you spew quite a few of those.
 
Miragememories said:
Once the thermite began to react against the steel, it would find steel in front and below it.
MM
Click to expand...

And would flow downward creating slag, negating its effectiveness. That’s why it isn’t used in controlled demolition, but you already knew that… didn’t you?
Another unsubstantiated assumption.
 
fess said:
And would flow downward creating slag, negating its effectiveness. That’s why it isn’t used in controlled demolition, but you already knew that… didn’t you?
Another unsubstantiated assumption.
Click to expand...

It's 'slack' Fess. Ask Oystein.
 
Patriots4Truth said:
of course the Truth movement has resources
they are developing confidential military grade explosives as we speak
Click to expand...

Doubtful, beyond getting themselves out of a wet paper bag, they really don't have the smarts.

Maybe between Jones and Harritt they might be able to find their way out of a dry paper bag.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Doubtful, beyond getting themselves out of a wet paper bag, they really don't have the smarts.

Maybe between Jones and Harritt they might be able to find their way out of a dry paper bag.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

I know I know! The answer is nano-thermite, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom