DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
You don't know?That would be hard to explain with my theory I admit. Are you sure there were people on all of the impacted floors?
You don't know?That would be hard to explain with my theory I admit. Are you sure there were people on all of the impacted floors?
Looks to me like there are people waving from broken windows on several of them. I'll try to dig up a video of some of them. Edna Cintron is the first one who comes to mind.That would be hard to explain with my theory I admit. Are you sure there were people on all of the impacted floors?
Looks to me like there are people waving from broken windows on several of them. I'll try to dig up a video of some of them. Edna Cintron is the first one who comes to mind.
That would be hard to explain with my theory I admit. Are you sure there were people on all of the impacted floors?
I'm too lazy to do much research myself.
But use Occam's razor. What is the simplest explanation?
I'm too lazy to do much research myself.
Guns run out of bullets.Ordinary office fires have more heat energy than thermite. You lost this one try again.
Bringing thermite to a large office fire, is like bringing a knife to a gun fight.
Looks to me like there are people waving from broken windows on several of them. I'll try to dig up a video of some of them. Edna Cintron is the first one who comes to mind.
And there are no tenants listed for WTC 2, floor 77 or floor 83 in this list: http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/tenants2.html
Palmer was on 78. It was a "sky lobby." Wouldn't that make 77 a mechanical floor?
I don't know, but what about floor 83? Could it have been floor 83 where the fireball explosion started?
I don't know, but what about floor 83? Could it have been floor 83 where the fireball explosion started?
I'm too lazy to do much research myself.
Buildings like that surely must be built at least 5 times the needed strength to withstand decades of aging, severe hurricanes and minor earthquakes.
But use Occam's razor. What is the simplest explanation? Four commercial airliners hijacked and flown with incredible speed and accuracy (well, except the one that plowed deep into the ground). Or, the scenario I have described?
But things like "lose most of its strength" isn't enough! Buildings like that surely must be built at least 5 times the needed strength to withstand decades of aging, severe hurricanes and minor earthquakes. So losing 51% of the steel's strength isn't enough. AND the fire could not possibly have made the steel equally weak everywhere. And since steel is a very good heat conductor you need Thermite do cause enough weakness on some floor.
I'm too lazy to do much research myself.
Guns run out of bullets.
MM
No. There are multiple points. As the plane passses through the building, windows break out and fuel escapes and the deflagrates. You can't do that with explosive charges. All the windows would goo at once.
But it seems to me that no window breaks out until the fireball starts. If it really was a real plane, then windows should have been broken all over the place before the fireball started, because of the energy released by the impact itself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQtSa-TZ6x8
Why would incredibly strong windows break on the other side of the building? Nothing hit them untill after impact.
You're talking out of your ass, as usual.
Anders,
Care to address this?
http://www.mace.manchester.ac.uk/pr...es/strucfire/materialInFire/Steel/default.htm
Yeah, no thermite needed.