Not again...............
![]()
No, I'm waiting for Al to answer my questions in posts 523 and 526.
I'm going to state it again, with a slight change:
I would guess Al really doesn't know much about the sound dynamics of different kinds of detonations.
Such as?I'm going to state it again, with a slight change:
I would guess Al really doesn't know much about the sound dynamics of different kinds of detonations.
I see Al is choosing to ignore my posts 523 and 526, I guess so he doesn't have to answer those questions, or explain the Great Balls of Fire! theory.
Do we believe Al's assessment of what demolition detonations could or could not sound like? I don't. Especially if we consider what a detonation within the basement levels might sound like on the outside, as well as ones set off within the core structure. I would guess Al really doesn't know everything about the sound dynamics of different kinds of detonations.
523- Yes, as the energy of even 100 gallons of jet fuel is very much capable.
526 - Yes, there are lots of reports of explosions. Absolutely. No one denies that. Can you name some of the things that go boom in a fire?
There are many of them. All would have been found in abundance in the WTC towers.
Now, how big is a 50 ton hydraulic press?
New Yorkers know what the 1993 bombing sounded like. The bomb was several levels below street level. When it was detonated it was heard up both towers and for blocks around on the street.
Lots of eyewitnesses on 9/11 heard the 1993 blast.
Nobody heard anything like 1993 in 2001.
There were no eyewitnesses reports of noises
consistent in timing, loudness or brisance
with man-made demolition.
I'm going to state it again, with a slight change:
I would guess Al really doesn't know much about the sound dynamics of different kinds of detonations.
Mind read much?
Originally Posted by BigAl View Post
New Yorkers know what the 1993 bombing sounded like. The bomb was several levels below street level. When it was detonated it was heard up both towers and for blocks around on the street.
Please provide evidence for this claim. As well as this:
:
Get to this later...
List some of them for us. And then please explain your fireball theory. That is, if you support it.
I don't know. Why don't you look it up?
Get to this later...
List some of them for us. And then please explain your fireball theory. That is, if you support it.
I don't know. Why don't you look it up?
No, I can just kind of tell by the way you're making statements without backing them up and using obvious cut and paste from some other source.
No, I can just kind of tell by the way you're making statements without backing them up and using obvious cut and paste from some other source.
Blast heard by occupants
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire95/PDF/f95137.pdf
http://www.interfire.org/res_file/pdf/Tr-076.pdf
page 87 - blast heard on the street
Big Al said:Nobody heard anything like 1993 in 2001.
New Yorkers know what the 1993 bombing sounded like.
I asked you to provide evidence for this claim:
So far you've only supported this claim:
A claim I wasn't disputing.
Moreover, your first pdf doesn't even have the words "blast" or "heard" in it. It has one instance of the word "hearing" in it. What point were you making with this citation?
They are his own words. Put this
There were no eyewitnesses reports of noises
consistent in timing, loudness or brisance
with man-made demolition.
Into Google with quotation marks around it. It links here, and one other place.
Good luck!!
Read For comprehension.
Nobody heard anything like 1993 in 2001.