Would anyone care to elaborate for/against the elaborate WTC7 CT?

[Patriots4Truth]

I believe it's essentially the same theory in both of these links but I'm no scientist. Is this controlled demolition hypothesis flawless? Are the assumptions all factual?

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread612056/pg1&addstar=1&on=9591114#pid9591114

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist7.htm

Sorry if I didn't use the search function. I just want the quick summary points

 

[BigAl]

I believe it's essentially the same theory in both of these links but I'm no scientist. Is this controlled demolition hypothesis flawless? Are the assumptions all factual?

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread612056/pg1&addstar=1&on=9591114#pid9591114

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist7.htm

Sorry if I didn't use the search function. I just want the quick summary points

Is it 2004 or 2006, I've lost track.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Is this controlled demolition hypothesis flawless?

Like "flat earth" theory.

Are the assumptions all factual?

Not a single bloody one.

 

[Chorduroy]

Given your user name, I would imagine you've already made up your mind, but on the off chance that you're truly inquiring ...

You can safely dismiss anything from Anders Bjorkman. He is a complete fraud.

 

[Patriots4Truth]

can you all be more specific about the flaws? sorry I'm new to 9/11 conspiracy as of 1 week ago

 

[Patriots4Truth]

Given your user name, I would imagine you've already made up your mind, but on the off chance that you're truly inquiring ...

You can safely dismiss anything from Anders Bjorkman. He is a complete fraud.

I'm in limbo. I don't know what is truth atm.

 

[DGM]

can you all be more specific about the flaws? sorry I'm new to 9/11 conspiracy as of 1 week ago

Lurk the forum for a while. How did you come up with your screen name?

 

[T.A.M.]

The science - flawed
The assumptions - flawed
The narrative - flawed
The brains behind them - flawed

Anything else?

TAM

 

[T.A.M.]

I'm in limbo. I don't know what is truth atm.

please enlighten me on the thought process behind the user name you chose for this forum?

Oh, and after that, please tell us how you found this forum?

TAM

 

[DGM]

I believe it's essentially the same theory in both of these links but I'm no scientist. Is this controlled demolition hypothesis flawless? Are the assumptions all factual?

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread612056/pg1&addstar=1&on=9591114#pid9591114

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist7.htm

Sorry if I didn't use the search function. I just want the quick summary points

Here's something about Heiwa.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=185871

 

[fitzgibbon]

I thought that horse'd been flogged to a bloody smear on the pavement 3 years ago.

Silly me.

 

[T.A.M.]

Is the user at ATS "LaBTop" Heiwa? That pathetic douche usually uses his own name.

TAM

 

[Patriots4Truth]

please enlighten me on the thought process behind the user name you chose for this forum?

Oh, and after that, please tell us how you found this forum?

TAM

Before I started reading numerous JREF posts today I was definitely leaning towards CD. Several posts have put me in limbo since then.

I answered your question. Now can you tell me what science is wrong with whatever is the current WTC7 CT? (the specifics)

Is there more up to date WTC7 conspiracy theories than the ones in my links?

 

[beachnut]

can you all be more specific about the flaws? sorry I'm new to 9/11 conspiracy as of 1 week ago

Nut case ideas. Dumb lies made to fool idiots.

 

[BigAl]

Before I started reading numerous JREF posts today I was definitely leaning towards CD. Several posts have put me in limbo since then.

I answered your question. Now can you tell me what science is wrong with whatever is the current WTC7 CT? (the specifics)

Is there more up to date WTC7 conspiracy theories than the ones in my links?

Troll much?

 

[Patriots4Truth]

Yesterday or the day before I started reading 'Invitation for Derek...' after I was linked to that thread via a google search. I've been keeping up with that thread ever since. I've also been reading 'Applicability of Bazant's model to the real world' and stuff about the WTC1 core.

 

[Patriots4Truth]

These threads are humongous. That's why I was hoping for summary points. But specifics.

 

[T.A.M.]

Sorry Patriot, no one is likely going to take the time to address that ridiculous Heiwa's insanity this late in the ballgame. Search the site, or use the word "JREF" and what ever topic you want, but I got my doubts anyone wants to take the time to spell it out for you...you are a grown up...look around.

TAM

Go here to read about the nutjob Heiwa, and his theories...

http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/

 

[Patriots4Truth]

the 2.25 second freefall had 0 resistance. was that ever explained?

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

the 2.25 second freefall had 0 resistance. was that ever explained?

The other 13.75+ seconds of the collapse had significant resistance.

Have the tinfoilers ever explained that?