DC
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Messages
- 23,064
you can just go ask them in confidence they will tell you.
They want to bring in sharia laws.
evidence?
you can just go ask them in confidence they will tell you.
They want to bring in sharia laws.
you can just go ask them in confidence they will tell you.
They want to bring in sharia laws.
I think perhaps what was meant was the common American misconception of a Fatwa - a death sentence pronounced by a Muslim cleric upon someone for a perceived or actual insult to Islam, a'la Salmon Rushdie. (sp?)
At leaset, that is MY misconception of the term.
I think the misconception has been pointed out here. Demanding that someone admit their ignorance on it seems pointless, but I don't know the backstory.
i hope he gets a fatwa.
I'm sure you'd feel exactly the same if someone burned the Bible or the US flag. We should kill all those demonstrators for being jerks, right?
My problem with Thunder's post is that he said he wants this guy to have a death wish on him:
which means Thunder thinks burning a Qur'an, which is a stupid and unnecessary act, is punishable by death, only he doesn't want to do it himself, he wants Muslim extremists to do it for him (a suggestion which is in and of itself disrespectful to all the other moderate Muslims).
He thinks burning a book is morally equivalent to having a death wish called on someone.
The Fool and Bit Pattern didn't seem to be offended by that.
and where does it say he molested her?
His "clarification" is that he merely meant by "fatwa" that Islamic scholars issue a religious opinion -- which we all know "has nothing to do with violence" (Mr. Rushdie might disagree, but I digress) -- "on his Nazi ass".
Sure. Because an appropriate punishment for outrageous behavior by a Nazi is surely a nonbinding, nonviolent, religious opinion issued by people of another religion. That's surely all he meant.
If you believe that, I means really believe it and not just pretend to, well, I've got a wonderful bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, cheap.
No, no, DC. It's quite clear he meant that he gets the same sort of "fatwa" as Salman Rushdie -- namely a death sentence -- if only because he also called the Koran burner a "Nazi" in the same post (and then repeated that Muslims should "put a fatwa on his Nazi ass".)
I am certainly not the only one who understood him to mean that: everybody else who replied to him did.
The one ANTPogo gave.
But that's definitely not the definition Thunder was going with when he said "I hope he gets a fatwa" was it?
Please try to follow the conversation.
we have a winner. fatwas have nothing to do with violence. they are simply religious opinions.
My problem with Thunder's post is that he said he wants this guy to have a death wish on him:
which means Thunder thinks burning a Qur'an, which is a stupid and unnecessary act, is punishable by death, .
don't lie about my posts. its bad for your reputation here at JREF.
he clarified it, and you know that.
True, true. But what proportion of terrorist attacks are by such people? Take all the terrorist attacks reported, say, by CNN in, say, the last three months. How many were by Jews and Christians and how many by Muslims?
It's true of course that all Muslims are terrorists, but practically all terrorist organizations are Muslim.
That's not a clarification, it's backpedaling. He got caught saying something horrendous, and he tried to pretend he didn't say it.
He still said it.
so you know better than him what he actually said. I think that might get you one million......
I base my opinion on logic. Thunder's post doesn't make sense if we take ANTPogo's definition of 'Fatwa'.
Can you make sense of it?