• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

A Qur'an Got Burnt at 9/11 Mosque Protest

Taqya (deception) is prevalent in Islam. Mohammad did it.
Imam Abdul Raoof is applying taqya to fool the West.
Muslims taqya will eat the West alive and West won't even know it.

Muslims can fool the CIA, FBI, NSA, Obama and Bush but they can't fool us the insiders.
We know every genetic code of Islam. We know every neurons of Islamic brain.
Unless West wakes up West will lose.
Death of the Western civilization at the hand of Islamic taqya is quite possible.
Just look at Europe.

Taqiya is the Islamic practice of precautionary dissimulation whereby believers may conceal their Muslim faith when under threat, persecution or compulsion.[1]

you can stop lieing about Islam now.
 
what a jerk. what a Nazi.

i hope he gets a fatwa.

No doubt you do.

Because, as we all know, being a jerk and having unpopular opinions deserves the death penalty as a punishment.

Free speech? Human rights? What's that? Nothing compared to the horrible crime of (oh the horror) "insulting Islam".

Oh, and P.S.

I'm sure you'd feel exactly the same if someone burned the Bible or the US flag. We should kill all those demonstrators for being jerks, right?
 
the Nazis burned Jewish holy books.
So what? As your quote in my signature shows, it's not a big deal -- it's not like one can show they individually wronged any Jew by that, right?
 
Slightly off topic, but the NY Times had an article about Muslims in Manhattan in which it was pointed out that there was a Muslim prayer room in the World Trade Center.
Those protesting the proposed cultural center, while fully within their rights to do so in whatever (legal) way they see fit, are morons.

I don't want to re-start a discussion that was done to death in another thread, but it's not the same thing: it's like the difference between happening to having an American culture house in Hiroshima before it were bombed, and deliberately opening a Disneyland park there afterward.
 
I don't want to re-start a discussion that was done to death in another thread, but it's not the same thing: it's like the difference between happening to having an American culture house in Hiroshima before it were bombed, and deliberately opening a Disneyland park there afterward.

Wow, you're so wrong I don't know if it's a joke or not.

It's actually like having an American cultural center in Hiroshima before the bombing, then attempting to open an American cultural center in some other Japanese city. Oh, and this only applies if America wasn't the entity that bombed Hiroshima; if it was actually a tiny subset of Americans who weren't connected to any sort of governmental institution or policy.
And if the openers of the second center were not in any way connected to any persons connected to the bombing.

By your logic, no dark-haired people should be allowed within at least 250 yards of ground zero (and any dark-haired people who attempt to venture within the constantly shifting limits should understand the anger directed at them).
 
Somehow I can't help but suspect that had the towers been attacked by radical christian fanatics, we'd not see folk rushing out to burn their bibles. As much as I think humans need to refrain from projecting non-evidence based value into material objects, I think this act screams of hypocrisy. And I don't think it will result in any good. This will simply re-enforce and validate the same religious delusion and paranoia that brought down the towers.

It's just stupid.
 
Do you believe in the freedom of expression?

Some people apparently don't, when it "insults Islam". Naturally they have no objection to burning the Bible or the US flag, though.

Why? Well, because it's unlikely murderously-inclined Christians or Americans will threaten to kill people in return.

They are simply cowards: when someone threatens insensate, violence, they "discover" they don't really have the right to do something after all.

You want to get these people to do what you want? Threaten them. Then they'll respect you. Indeed, over time, they will come to agree that your threats are perfectly legitimate and appropriate and wish you'd be violent more (see the second line in my signature for an example).

Obama lied in Cairo about Islamic golden age. There is no such thing as Islamic golden age. Islam plundered wherever it went.

Yes, in the 7th-8th century. Not necessarily, 200 years to 500 years later in Cairo or Muslim Spain.

Bush lied by saying Islam is a religion of peace.
Iamam Abdul Raoof lied by saying Islam means peach. Islam means surrender.

Well, yes and no. Islam certainly isn't a "religion of peace" but Islam's "surrender" means surrender to the will of God -- hardly a novel or necessarily violent concept in religion. In any case it means little. "Pravda" means "truth" -- hardly means the Stalin-era newspaper was accurate on the facts.

The word from which the word "Islam" is derived "Salam" means peace. But Islam means surrender, submission.

Again, true, but it doesn't necessarily mean "peace" for Muslims means that other people surrender. The linguistic similarity between "surrender" and "peace" in Arabic comes simply from the fact that Arabic (like Hebrew) has relatively few root words in the language and thus many words that are completely different in English "use" the same root in Arabic.

In Hebrew, for example, both "Shalom" (peace) and "Tashlum" (payment) come from the same root -- SLM -- which literally means "whole" (in the sense of "unbroken"). Is that proof Jews are greedy, who only consider it real peace if people pay them? No, it's just that both words have an etymological connection to "wholeness" (in time of peace things aren't deliberately broken, and when you pay someone what you owe they are "whole" again financially).

Similarly in Arabic "peace" and "Surrender to God" both are related to "wholeness" -- in the latter case in the sense of being wholly dedicated to God.

P.S.

It's not that people who use these words THINK about them this way, just like someone who uses the word, say, "homosexual" in English doesn't THINK "Same [Greek root] biological sex, esp. sex act, as opposed to love or lust [Latin root]". My point is precisely that they DON'T think about the etymological relationship 99% of the time, and that etymological relationship has no particular "deep meaning" to the speaker nor "shows" something about Arabic (or English) users.
 
I don't want to re-start a discussion that was done to death in another thread, but it's not the same thing: it's like the difference between happening to having an American culture house in Hiroshima before it were bombed, and deliberately opening a Disneyland park there afterward.

Islam did not attack the US. Extremist fundamentalists did. Finding the cultural center offensive requires guilt-by-association-based interpretation.
 
To: Thunder and other Islamofacist sympathizers:
From: Islamo-Realist (not Islamophobic)

So, what's wrong hating evil?
some aspect of Islamic teachings are outright evil and filthy.
Same is true, in a lesser degree, for every religion. But current version or interpretation of Islam is worse than any other religion. Islamic countries have least human rights and freedom when compared to the West.

and what's is wrong with book burning?
We are not talking about burning all the copies of a book or a library. There is nothing wrong burning just one or two copies of a bad book as symbolic gesture to express once opinion.
Do you believe in the freedom of expression?
We (like minded) are not advocating killing Muslims but exposing the filth of Islam to the ignorants of West.
Unlike Geert Wilder, the Dutch parliment member, I am against baning Quran. But buring couple of copies to make your point is perfectly OK.
We must expose Islamic filthy teachings to the West. So far only 35% of the US population has negative opinion about Islam. We shall make this number to 75% just telling the truth about Mohommad, Quran, Hadith, and Islamic history.
Obama lied in Cairo about Islamic golden age. There is no such thing as Islamic golden age. Islam plundered wherever it went.
Bush lied by saying Islam is a religion of peace.
Iamam Abdul Raoof lied by saying Islam means peach. Islam means surrender.
The word from which the word "Islam" is derived "Salam" means peace. But Islam means surrender, submission. Most Muslims have surrendered their brain.

West has no idea how sick Islam is.
Western gullible, simple, kind heated people has no idea of the Islamic history, Mohammad's sayings and filthy deeds.
Taqya (deception) is prevalent in Islam. Mohammad did it.
Imam Abdul Raoof is applying taqya to fool the West.
Muslims taqya will eat the West alive and West won't even know it.

Muslims can fool the CIA, FBI, NSA, Obama and Bush but they can't fool us the insiders.
We know every genetic code of Islam. We know every neurons of Islamic brain.
Unless West wakes up West will lose.
Death of the Western civilization at the hand of Islamic taqya is quite possible.
Just look at Europe.

So I shouldn't be teaching Algebra this year?
 
Taqiya is the Islamic practice of precautionary dissimulation whereby believers may conceal their Muslim faith when under threat, persecution or compulsion.[1]

you can stop lieing about Islam now.

As you will define "jihad" as inner jihad.
But the world is learning there is another meaning of "jihad". Unfortunately they are learning the hard way.

so, yes, one of the definition of "tiqiya" is as you defined. And another one, the more useful one, the more practiced one is "deception".

Mohammad, the child molester, who also married 9 years old girl, practiced taqiya a lot. When his army was weak he talked nice, like "killing one innocent man is like killing the whole civilization". But when his army got stronger he ordered "kill the kuffar wherever you find them." If one put Quran 114 surath in chronological order then they will find, the good parts of the Quran is when Mohammad's sword was weak, he needed compassion from the enemy. Later he robbed, loot, plundered.

I am going to make you stark naked.
you can fool the West but can't fool me. I am the insider. I am your worst night mare. We are hundreds of thousands in number in the West. We will expose your filthy Islam. It will take about a decade.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/42158/pakistan/
 
As you will define "jihad" as inner jihad.
But the world is learning there is another meaning of "jihad". Unfortunately they are learning the hard way.

so, yes, one of the definition of "tiqiya" is as you defined. And another one, the more useful one, the more practiced one is "deception".

Mohammad, the child molester, who also married 9 years old girl, practiced taqiya a lot. When his army was weak he talked nice, like "killing one innocent man is like killing the whole civilization". But when his army got stronger he ordered "kill the kuffar wherever you find them." If one put Quran 114 surath in chronological order then they will find, the good parts of the Quran is when Mohammad's sword was weak, he needed compassion from the enemy. Later he robbed, loot, plundered.

I am going to make you stark naked.
you can fool the West but can't fool me. I am the insider. I am your worst night mare. We are hundreds of thousands in number in the West. We will expose your filthy Islam. It will take about a decade.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/42158/pakistan/

What is your evidence for mohammed molesting children? afaik he wasn't a Christian priest.
 
Wow, you're so wrong I don't know if it's a joke or not.

It's actually like having an American cultural center in Hiroshima before the bombing, then attempting to open an American cultural center in some other Japanese city. Oh, and this only applies if America wasn't the entity that bombed Hiroshima; if it was actually a tiny subset of Americans who weren't connected to any sort of governmental institution or policy.
And if the openers of the second center were not in any way connected to any persons connected to the bombing.

By your logic, no dark-haired people should be allowed within at least 250 yards of ground zero (and any dark-haired people who attempt to venture within the constantly shifting limits should understand the anger directed at them).

By your logic, no dark-haired people should be allowed within at least 250 yards of ground zero

Dark skin has to do with race. Islam is not a race. Islam is a mental virus. It takes control of the brain and the victim can't think rationality. Mosque represent Islam. those 19 hijackers were Muslims. And then there are London, 7/7 bombing, Madird bombing, Bali Bombing, Mumbai bombing, visit "religionofpeace.org" to see over 10,000 terrorism committed by Muslims since 9/11.

this high statistic is abnormal. This strand of memetic mental virus is dangerous. We need to watch Muslims. Muslims in the West are trojan horse.
They will play taqiya.
 
What is your evidence for mohammed molesting children? afaik he wasn't a Christian priest.

He married 9 year old girl.
what do you know about Islam.
Visit www.faithfreedom.org to learn about true Islam.

First, Christian priests are not the prophet. Christian priests are just regular human being.
Where as Muslims believe Mohammad was a prophet. A prophet, the last prophet, the perfect man (as Muslims believe), must be judged with higher standard.

2nd, we know what Christian priest do, child molestation, is a bad thing. Neither you, or me, nor an average Christian are approve of it.
But Mohammad having 4 wifes at the same time, and have 9 years old as wife is not considered anything bad by Muslims. In Islam marrying 9 years old is OK. It is practiced in Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries.

Muslims don't even feel guilty about it. It is not wrong for them. They also marry cousin. Islam allows that.
Islam teaches 2 women witness = 1 man witness, quran 2:282.
Quran teaches, kill the kuffar wherever you find them.

the list goes on.
 
Last edited:
Islam did not attack the US. Extremist fundamentalists did. Finding the cultural center offensive requires guilt-by-association-based interpretation.

complete nonsense.
Human being whose brain was hijacked, infected by memetic islamic mental virus attacked the US. You can call them whatever, you want. But fact of the matter is that disproportionately higher percentage of brains whose operating system is Islam commits terrorism when compared to the other religions like Hinduism, or Christianity.

Statistic speak louder than liberal's mental disorder.

It is not the problem of the hardware. Software is the problem.
Race is not the problem. Ideology is. Great majority of French prisoners (criminals) have converted to Islam. Islam is naturally attractive to violent people.

Disclaimer: I am not advocating any form of violence against Muslims. I am advocating exposing the sickness of Islam. We must stand up and call spade a spade. Islam is evil. At present it is the worse religion when compared to any other religion.

I am less concerned from active terrorist. I am more concerned with stealth jihadists like Tariq Ramadan of Switzerland, or Imam Abdul Raoof and CAIR etc.
 
Last edited:
He married 9 year old girl.
what do you know about Islam.
Visit www.faithfreedom.org to learn about true Islam.

First, Christian priests are not the prophet. Christian priests are just regular human being.
Where as Muslims believe Mohammad was a prophet. A prophet, the last prophet, the perfect man (as Muslims believe), must be judged with higher standard.

2nd, we know what Christian priest do, child molestation, is a bad thing. Neither you, or me, nor an average Christian are approve of it.
But Mohammad having 4 wifes at the same time, and have 9 years old as wife is not considered anything bad by Muslims. In Islam marrying 9 years old is OK. It is practiced in Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countries.

Muslims don't even feel guilty about it. It is not wrong for them. They also marry cousin. Islam allows that.
Islam teaches 2 women witness = 1 man witness, quran 2:282.
Quran teaches, kill the kuffar wherever you find them.

the list goes on.

with true islam you mean the Islam like Osama and the Taliban interpret it? or the Islam that the millions of peacefull muslims believe in?

he married her, but that doesn't mean he molested her.

I have no problem with polygamy. And marriage between cousins is also here allowed.


where does the Quran teach to kill kuffar wherever you find them, can you imagine the bloody mess it would be if they would believe that?
 
Algebra. Al-jibr.

give that BS to some ignorant. [another BS -al-chamist, another BS, zero]
It is originally invented in India, 3 thousand years ago. before Islam

Beside, what that has to do book burning?

secondly, what part of the algebra was invented by Arab?
x, the variable. the concept of assuming a letter as unknown. Big deal.
Was differential equation invented by Muslim. NO.
Algebra has evolved big time. A lot more work is done by Newton.

A city mayer put a brick in the foundation for a 100 story building in a televised ceremony. After cutting the ribbon and short speech he leaves in his limo. Dozen's of designers, architect designed the building. Hundreds of laborer build the building.
According to your logic, city mayor deserve the credit for the finished product of 100 story tall building.

Same logic goes for chemistry, zero, and algebra.
No. Islam never had its golden age. Watch this Islamic scholar interview where he debunks the myth of Islamic Golden age. Islam is parasite.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE2IPm6bneU

http://www.ilmgate.org/chasing-a-mirage-by-tarek-fatah-book-review/
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom