• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Detax Canada

drkitten said:
Oddly enough, I didn't.

I guess I'm just not smart enough to be a Frootloop on the Lam.
Click to expand...

Maybe a little paranoia wouldn't go amiss. After all, your optician could gain perfect eyesight without glasses, but how much more valuable is being able to say "Yeah, I could get that surgery for free, but I didn't"? "Oh, and by the way, did you want to order some prescription sunglasses whilst you're here? Maybe a spare pair of glasses to keep in the car?" I don't think it's too unreasonable to suggest your optician has something of a vested interest in ensuring you keep coming back every couple of years.
 
EldonG said:
The DetaxCanada program teaches you how to get out from under the slave status status imposed upon you by the corporate Crown of the City of London - yes, the Queen of GB is just an agent for the corporate Crown of the City of London - as all British Monarchs have been since the treaty between Pope Innocent III and King John of 1213 - that made the Pontiff of Rome 'Overlord' of England, and that is not a Roman Catholic thing - it is a secular/worldly rulership that has not changed since that time. Don't believe me? GOOGLE "King John and Innocent III". The information is on RC websites.
Click to expand...
I did just that. It appears there wasn't very much done about the Papal Fiefdom thing after the death of King John in 1216 and the recall of Pandulf Masca to Rome in 1221. John's son Henry III worked tirelessly to get England back under his control.

Then there was that little split with Rome that Henry VIII did in 1536. And the fact there hasn't been a Roman Catholic monarch in Great Britain since the Glorious Revolution of 1688, when James II was kicked off the throne and replaced with William III and Mary II.

But don't let facts get in your way. (That hasn't seemed to be a problem so far, actually.)

If you can supply proof that England still sends 1000 silver marks a year to Rome as required by the treaty of 1213, I'll believe that England is still a vassal state of the Roman Catholic Church.
 
Blue Mountain said:
If you can supply proof that England still sends 1000 silver marks a year to Rome as required by the treaty of 1213, I'll believe that England is still a vassal state of the Roman Catholic Church.
Click to expand...

I would suggest that the fact that the Monarch of England has to 'down-dress' and ask the Lord Mayor of London for permission to enter the City (City of London) should be a clue as to the servitude status of the British Monarchs to the Holy Roman Empire and its sub-capitol for banking, Temple Bar (lawyers) and Professional standards (educational degrees).
 
EldonG said:
I would suggest that the fact that the Monarch of England has to 'down-dress' and ask the Lord Mayor of London for permission to enter the City (City of London) should be a clue as to the servitude status of the British Monarchs to the Holy Roman Empire and its sub-capitol for banking, Temple Bar (lawyers) and Professional standards (educational degrees).
Click to expand...

Except you haven't provided any actual links between London and the Roman Catholic Church. Getting permission wouldn't necessarily be done for the reason you postulate - there are all sorts of simpler explanations, starting with saying it's an outdated tradition that no longer means anything real. (Assuming this policy Eldon mentions is even true - I don't know that for certain.)
 
Lyrandar said:
Except you haven't provided any actual links between London and the Roman Catholic Church. Getting permission wouldn't necessarily be done for the reason you postulate - there are all sorts of simpler explanations, starting with saying it's an outdated tradition that no longer means anything real. (Assuming this policy Eldon mentions is even true - I don't know that for certain.)
Click to expand...



I don't think you'll be surprised.



It is sometimes asserted that the Lord Mayor may exclude the Sovereign from the City of London. The legend is based on the misinterpretation of the ceremony observed each time the Sovereign enters the City. At Temple Bar the Lord Mayor presents the City's pearl-encrusted Sword of State to the Sovereign as a symbol of the latter's overlordship. The Sovereign does not, as is often purported, wait for the Lord Mayor's permission to enter the City.
Click to expand...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Bar,_London

It has long been the custom that the monarch stop at Temple Bar before entering the City of London, so that the Lord Mayor may offer him or her the City's pearl-encrusted Sword of State as a token of loyalty. This historic ceremony has often featured in art and literature, as well as shown on television when it occurs at special occasions in the present era. However, the popular view that the monarch requires the Lord Mayor's permission to enter the City is incorrect.
Click to expand...
 
EldonG said:
I would suggest that the fact that the Monarch of England has to 'down-dress' and ask the Lord Mayor of London for permission to enter the City (City of London) should be a clue as to the servitude status of the British Monarchs to the Holy Roman Empire and its sub-capitol for banking, Temple Bar (lawyers) and Professional standards (educational degrees).
Click to expand...
This is a logical fallacy known as "moving the goalposts." I implied I wanted proof that England is sending a thousand silver marks per year to Rome as required by the treaty of 1213. Indeed, I wouldn't be surprised if the payment was sent less that a dozen times, and probably only two or three: 1213, 1214, and 1215. John died in 1216.
 
EldonG said:
A few years ago, Parliament/the corporate Crown enacted an amendment that made all lawyers and accountants pseudo-CRA agents, under penalty of a heavy fine for giving any meaningful advice to the Canadian people on how to avoid or escape taxation. So much for any lawyers or accountants advising or helping find loopholes , let alone advising people how to get out from under the imposed 'slave status', and the 'harvesting of the friuts of the labour of Crown owned slaves' - income tax.
Click to expand...

evidence for this please?
 
EldonG said:
You give another good reason why there is no help with income tax issues coming from lawyers or accountants.

The DetaxCanada program teaches you how to get out from under the slave status status imposed upon you by the corporate Crown of the City of London - yes, the Queen of GB is just an agent for the corporate Crown of the City of London - as all British Monarchs have been since the treaty between Pope Innocent III and King John of 1213 - that made the Pontiff of Rome 'Overlord' of England, and that is not a Roman Catholic thing - it is a secular/worldly rulership that has not changed since that time. Don't believe me? GOOGLE "King John and Innocent III". The information is on RC websites.

The DetaxCanada program has absolutely no reference to 'so-called' loopholes. It is just a matter of reality over fiction.

But then, I am forgetting... Those posting here know a lot more than anyone else about such matters.....
Click to expand...


perhaps you are unaware of the english reformation under henry viii.:rolleyes:
 
EldonG said:
If you read the posts of the damage control goons, you will find a myriad of 'off topic' and 'damn the messenger' posts, and very little discussion on the merits or lack of merits of the Detax Canada program, which seems to me to be the topic of this thread.
Click to expand...
Your detax nonsense was completely debunked by post #10 of this thread. Go back and re-read if you need a reminder, especially post #10. In fact, you debunk your own system yourself on your own web page. Shall I quote you again?

Recent problems encountered by those who file a T1 using my method.


So-called 'employees' are having CRA re-assess their returns based upon the T-4 slip sent to CRA by the 'employer'. That is the document the employer sends to you sometime during January or February stating 'employee 'income'.

Conclusion: I don't currently have a solution to this problem

http://www.detaxcanada.org/filing problems.rtf
Click to expand...

The rest has just been entertainment.
 
Damn, an entire tax avoision scheme derailed by a T4 slip*? That's one robust bit of woo, I must say!




*For the non-Canadians out there, the T4 is one of, if not the most common bits of government paperwork seen by regular citizens. You usually only get driver's licenses once in your life, a passport or birth certificate a few times, but most people get a T4 every damn year. More than one, if you have more than one job.

How Eldon missed this is beyond me.
 
EldonG said:
I don't have any complaint about queers, faggots, and such. I could care less if men choose to use their penis as a rectum stimulator, and call it sex. At least they are not contributing their genes to the future gene pool that way.
So, it is a single generation phenomenon of that party anyway.
Click to expand...

oh my
 
Horatius said:
Damn, an entire tax avoision scheme derailed by a T4 slip*? That's one robust bit of woo, I must say!




*For the non-Canadians out there, the T4 is one of, if not the most common bits of government paperwork seen by regular citizens. You usually only get driver's licenses once in your life, a passport or birth certificate a few times, but most people get a T4 every damn year. More than one, if you have more than one job.

How Eldon missed this is beyond me.
Click to expand...

Your link goes to the urban dictionary.
 
EldonG said:
Well, I am glad my website is serving two good purposes - teaching Canadians and Americans how to get out from under the Pope imposed involuntary servitude (slave) status, and creating some humour for those who have had their heads removed by the guillotine.
Click to expand...

Are you feeling alright?
 
EldonG said:
The City of London, n independent city /state within England is owned by the Pontiff of Rome. The Crown of the City is a sub-corporation of the corporate Holy Roman Empire, of which the pontiff of Rome is CEO.
Click to expand...

That is total crap,pure babble from the looney bin.Get help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom