• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Coast to Coast AM Debate, August 21 2010

Double talk.

That does not preclude hearing any explosions. On the contrary, the qualifier "capable of cutting any of the columns" implies that they heard an explosion that sounded like something else, like a transformer perhaps.

Which is it? Did they hear an explosion or not? We can't be sure because the second hand account does not specify one way or the other.

Says the guy with no first hand accounts of molten steel!
 
Completely irrelevant diversion from the fact that nobody heard explosives go off that day.
Pure denial of over 100 first responders and dozens of survivors. Pure denial of the explosions caught on video and posted here.
 
Pure denial of over 100 first responders and dozens of survivors. Pure denial of the explosions caught on video and posted here.

There are no eyewitnesses reports or video recordings of noises consistent in timing, loudness and brisance with man-made demolition.

None. Nada.
 
Pure denial of over 100 first responders and dozens of survivors. Pure denial of the explosions caught on video and posted here.
Thank you for proving that reading comprehension is not a part of your skill set. Did I say that nobody heard explosions? Wait, what did I actually say:
Did things explode or make sharp sounds that could be interpreted as an explosion? Yes.
Cherry pick what you find convenient to your fantasy and ignore everything else. Typical denier of reality tactic.
 
This is the dinior chior merry-go-round.

Play with semantics and ask questions that have been asked and answered many times.

Merriam Webster Dictionary
1: obsolete : made by melting and casting

2: fused or liquefied by heat : melted <molten lava>

3: having warmth or brilliance : glowing


TFC, fess,
The explosion witnesses have been posted many times. Go back over this thread or Google 911 explosion witnesses.

BigAl,
For the last time. You don't know what is possible as far as how much the sound can be muffled. You are assuming they did not try to keep the sound down at all.

* * * * *

All this interference is to direct attention away from the fact that Dave's "scientific experiment" is about as silly as Richard Gage's boxes. The only difference is, Mr. Gage was joking. The box "experiment" was clearly tong in cheek as his exaggerated facial expression indicates [something some people are to dumb to understand].

But Dave is serious.
 
BigAl,
For the last time. You don't know what is possible as far as how much the sound can be muffled. You are assuming they did not try to keep the sound down at all.
Actually, that is quite known. The ability to lower the sound output of explosives by any significant level is non-existent. I know, you'll attempt to use the usual denial of reality tactic of claiming that there is some supersekret Hush-A-Boom technology that some supersekrit government department may have created but we don't know because it's a sekrit, but you know that it exists because you say so.
 
Molten does not necessarily mean liquid. Iron, like lava is considered molten until it has completely solidified. The molten iron/steel in the crab claw is orange hot and solid enough at the top to be picked up as a glob. The bottom is white hot and dripping. That's why you can see thru it.

Truthers are true idiots! They can't distinguish between molten or burning metal.

Thanks Chris for being that type of person!
 
Actually, that is quite known. The ability to lower the sound output of explosives by any significant level is non-existent. I know, you'll attempt to use the usual denial of reality tactic of claiming that there is some supersekret Hush-A-Boom technology that some supersekrit government department may have created but we don't know because it's a sekrit, but you know that it exists because you say so.

I actually had some dip tell me the tube in tube design acts like a muffler which silenced the explosions.....I then reminded him of what happens when a muffler has combustion occur inside itself (backfire). At that point he just kept repeating himself and changing the subject.
 
How quaintly Orwellian ;)

lapman,
You don't know diddly

You say that I don't know diddly, I research history alot & I know what to look for to prove people like you wrong.

You don't even know the word "research". All you can do is look at Truther websites & take them as "facts & evidence" when they're completely the opposite of what they are.

You think you know everything about thermite? Obviously you haven't begun to discover what it's real function is or what it's meant to do. And you think it's used as an "explosive" all by itself, well for someone who don't know Jack about thermite sure can stretch the true a little too far.
 
TFC, fess,
The explosion witnesses have been posted many times. Go back over this thread or Google 911 explosion witnesses.

Most of the comments about explosives were taken out of context, similar to telling a lie. And, just because something sounds like an explosion doesn’t necessarily mean it was an explosion caused by… well, an explosive.
 
Most of the comments about explosives were taken out of context, similar to telling a lie. And, just because something sounds like an explosion doesn’t necessarily mean it was an explosion caused by… well, an explosive.
That is true in the real world. However, in the delusional world that truthers like C7 live in, explosions can only be caused by explosives. In C7s world, we have no idea what the capabilities of the supersekret gubmint is, but he does and can make any claim he wants to and it is an irrefutable fact that we cannot debunk, because we are in the dark.
 
Most of the comments about explosives were taken out of context, similar to telling a lie.
That is a false accusation. Please show one that is taken out of context or STFU. Remember, out of context means "distorting the intended meaning".

And, just because something sounds like an explosion doesn’t necessarily mean it was an explosion caused by… well, an explosive.
How many times have I heard that? :rolleyes:

Not necessarily but possibly. The fact that you will never admit that explosives are even a possibility proves that you are in denial.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom