• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Who will be the Republican candidate next election

Probably Romney. He is helped by the fact that Glen Beck is convincing the hysterical right-wing fundamentalists that Mormons are just as crazy as they are.
 
Whomever it is, I hope they get elected. I can't wait to point out the flaws, and the lies, and hypocrisy of the republican president, and watch the conservatives on the board fanatically defend him/her.
 
Bobby Jindal of Louisiana would be an interesting candidate.

A run by Jindal will make the actor who plays Kenneth the Page on 30 Rock an instant star. SNL will be return to glory. I finally have a reason to support a GOP candidate again!
 
Whomever it is, I hope they get elected. I can't wait to point out the flaws, and the lies, and hypocrisy of the republican president, and watch the conservatives on the board fanatically defend him/her.

Wait, they will say that all their criticisms of Obama (my favorite was the terrible Dijon Mustard crisis) were warranted. Every...single...one.
 
Why on earth would Palin run? She's making obscene amounts of money for giving the same speech over and over and has expressed basically no interest in actually governing anything. At best the presidency would mean 4 years off of the lucrative speaking circuit for her, at worst it could derail her gravy train.

Glenn Beck, for all his bombast, doesn't appear interested in actually running for office. And why would he? He's the most successful and visible member of his profession (which I'll politely define as "pundit"), with a national platform to spout whatever he wants and basically no requirements to actually deliver on anything. Why ruin a good thing?

I assume Romney will run yet again, and if nobody interesting runs he'll have a shot. His only downside on a national stage is being Mormon, and his only upside is good hair.

Jindal was sort of being set up as a Republican Obama, but the only speeches I've seen from him were brutally bad. No idea if he's spent the off season training, but I haven't been impressed so far. He'll have a tough time as a "ethnic" Republican in the primaries in any case, doubt he could pull it off in a tea party climate but he might surprise me.

Pawlenty is apparently in the running and seems to be a more or less prototypical Republican. He's towed (toed? toad?) the party line for the most part and I don't know of any scandals that'd bother the Republican base. So his main problem just seems to be a lack of immediate name recognition in a field that is dominated by celebrities.

There'll be some throwbacks in the running like Newt Gingrich early on, if he can capitalize on... nostalgia?... he could make a showing of it. He's been out of actual politics long enough for his past sins to have been mostly forgotten, and can pull out the "back to the good old days" card. I suspect he (or someone like him) will make a good early showing then fade.

... and now I'll get to look back in a couple years and laugh at how completely wrong I was in this post. ;)
 
Wait, they will say that all their criticisms of Obama (my favorite was the terrible Dijon Mustard crisis) were warranted. Every...single...one.

Of course. And their candidate walks on water, is awesome, and the country is finally going where it should be! (cue heavenly music)
 
Jindal was sort of being set up as a Republican Obama, but the only speeches I've seen from him were brutally bad. No idea if he's spent the off season training, but I haven't been impressed so far. He'll have a tough time as a "ethnic" Republican in the primaries in any case, doubt he could pull it off in a tea party climate but he might surprise me.

If this happens I would love to see how Republicans who called BO Barack HUSSEIN Obama would react to Dems using Jindal's real name, Piyush Amrit Jindal. My bet is they would call foul (rightfully but hypocritically so).
 
It all depends on whether TP fervor will have subsided by 2012. If it has, Romney has a clear path to the nomination. If not... god only knows.
Aside from Palin, nobody among the GOP's heavy hitters is doctrinaire conservative enough to appeal to TP fundies. And Palin is thoroughly unelectable.
 
Last edited:
The question of Ron Paul is also an interesting one, especially with the Tea Party fervor.
If Ron Paul mounts another campaign [which he almost certainly won't], his supporters will once again flood the internet with sound and fury and talk of a revolution, and he'll pull in his usual 2-5% of the vote.
 
Last edited:
Apologies if there has been other threads about this, but I haven't seen one recently.


There's always this thread, which is sort of a running account of speculation and progress toward the conclusion of the question at hand. But, you can never have too many threads on this salient topic.
 
Romney is the choice because the GOP usually nominates the person who is next in line. S.P. is not even a candidate.
 
Why can't they find any statesmen and stateswomen? You know - people with a bit of integrity, manners and decency. It's what they are supposed to stand for, isn't it??

They have to represent the current republican party.
 
Technically that would be Huckabee in this case.

Huckabee could actually be an interesting candidate depending upon who the politics forces him into bed with. Rather like McCain circa 1998 - 2004 instead of the McCain we got in 2007-2008
 
It all depends on whether TP fervor will have subsided by 2012.

Will we know that by this November? Would they still be active if the Republicans take one or both houses of Congress? Or, on the other hand, would a continued Democratic majority tweak the Teabaggers even more?
 
If this happens I would love to see how Republicans who called BO Barack HUSSEIN Obama would react to Dems using Jindal's real name, Piyush Amrit Jindal. My bet is they would call foul (rightfully but hypocritically so).

Not to mention his supporters who felll in love with POTUS Obama's middle name.

Obama Supporters Take His Name as Their Own

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29hussein.html

CHRIS MATTHEWS: "Do you have a sense, though, well certainly I have it, that just by his name, Barack, ah, Barack Hussein Obama, by his background, having grown up in Indonesia which is a largely Muslim country, that he would have a feel perhaps other presidential candidates don't have of how to connect with that part of the world, the billion people, that we seem to have such a problem connecting with and avoiding war with."

http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2007/08/barack-hussein-obama-chris-matthews.html
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom