Coast to Coast AM Debate, August 21 2010

[Reactor drone]

You know nothing about what nano-thermite can do so stop making false statements like that.

So, which properties of Nanothermite led you to believe it was used to bring down the WTC towers? How did you come by this information? Do you have any links that the rest of us might read?

Are you sure you're not confusing nanothermite with unobtainium?

 

[Christopher7]

So, which properties of Nanothermite led you to believe it was used to bring down the WTC towers? How did you come by this information? Do you have any links that the rest of us might read?

Which properties? The fact that it is in the WTC dust there and there is only one reason for it to be there - to melt steel. The iron spheres that were found by the USGS and the RJ Lee Group are consistent with spheres created by nano-thermite as can be seen in these photos:

There is no other known explanation for the iron spheres that make up nearly 6% of the WTC dust. The RJ Lee Group states that they were created during the event.

 

[BigAl]

Which properties? The fact that it is in the WTC dust there and there is only one reason for it to be there - to melt steel. The iron spheres that were found by the USGS and the RJ Lee Group are consistent with spheres created by nano-thermite as can be seen in these photos:

Nowhere does the RJ Lee report mention thermite.

 

[BigAl]

You know nothing about what nano-thermite can do so stop making false statements like that.

You know nothing about what any nano-thermite can do so stop making false statements like that.

 

[Christopher7]

Nowhere does the RJ Lee report mention thermite.

Correct. It is also correct that there is no other known explanation for the abundance of microscopic iron spheres in the WTC dust.

You know nothing about what any nano-thermite can do so stop making false statements like that.

I know that the smaller the particles the faster the reaction. I know that the byproduct of nano-thermite is microscopic iron spheres. I know that there is no other known explanation for the abundance of microscopic iron spheres in the WTC dust.

 

[Reactor drone]

I know that the byproduct of nano-thermite is microscopic iron spheres. I know that there is no other known explanation for the abundance of microscopic iron spheres in the WTC dust.

How do you know this?

 

[Christopher7]

How do you know this?

I have already answered that. But I'll elaborate:
The dust was deposited by the dust clouds produced by the collapses of the Trade Towers. The WTC dust is unique and can be determined by it's "signature". The nearly 6% iron spheres is part of that unique signature.

The only known source for the abundance of microscopic iron spheres is nano-thermite.

[FONT=&quot]R J Lee - spheres - high temp[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/WTC/130%20Liberty%20Street/Mike%20Davis%20LMDC%20130%20Liberty%20Documents/Signature%20of%20WTC%20dust/WTC%20Dust%20Signature.Composition%20and%20Morphology.Final.pdf[/FONT]

 

[Reactor drone]

I have already answered that. But I'll elaborate:
The dust was deposited by the dust clouds produced by the collapses of the Trade Towers. The WTC dust is unique and can be determined by it's "signature". The nearly 6% iron spheres is part of that unique signature.

The only known source for the abundance of microscopic iron spheres is nano-thermite.

[FONT=&quot]R J Lee - spheres - high temp[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/WTC/130%20Liberty%20Street/Mike%20Davis%20LMDC%20130%20Liberty%20Documents/Signature%20of%20WTC%20dust/WTC%20Dust%20Signature.Composition%20and%20Morphology.Final.pdf[/FONT]

Ah, so because you think thermite is the only possible reason for there being iron spheres in the dust that means you know there was thermite because of the iron spheres in the dust.

I thought it might be because you had some evidence that nanothermite actually produces iron spheres rather than a bare assertion.

 

[Christopher7]

Ah, so because you think thermite is the only possible reason for there being iron spheres in the dust that means you know there was thermite because of the iron spheres in the dust.

No.
I know about the nano-thermite because of the paper written by a team of highly qualified professionals and I can see the microscopic iron spheres in the photos above.

Some people hand wave this information but they are the same people who hand wave all evidence that refutes the OCT. Their consistency is proof that they are in denial.

 

[excaza]

No.
I know about the nano-thermite because of the paper written by a team of highly qualified professionals and I can see the microscopic iron spheres in the photos above.

Some people hand wave this information but they are the same people who hand wave all evidence that refutes the OCT. Their consistency is proof that they are in denial.

Can you please link us to the paper written by a team of highly qualified professionals that states nanothermite produces iron spheres and/or that it's the only mechanism that can?

 

[Christopher7]

Can you please link us to the paper written by a team of highly qualified professionals that states nanothermite produces iron spheres and/or that it's the only mechanism that can?

No

Google nano-thermite paper.

Iron microspheres are produced by other means but not in the abundance found in the WTC dust. The background dust contained about .04% iron microspheres.

 

[Sabretooth]

I or H sections have deep channel rails eminently suitable for the painting on of multiple layers of nanothermite Glenn. Then a nice thick coat of fireproofing and Bob's your uncle..

PS. Did you never read about the fact that they had 'upgraded'- read 'thickened' the fireproofing on the floors that had fire in WTC1 ? Nanothermite ignites at about 460-odd degrees and they were afraid the jet fuel would ignite it prematurely.

Talk about pulling **** out of your ***...

So the fact that the planes blasted the fireproofing off many of the beams didn't "prematurely" ignite the thermite?

You may as well switch over to being a no-planer, bill...cuz this theory is just as retarded.

 

[Sabretooth]

...You will never admit this because you are in denial.

...and you're in denial about your lack of basic physics knowledge.

Repeating this drivel over and over and over and over again doesn't make your opinion valid. You've already been shown why your opinion and (mis)interpretation of the data is wrong dozens of times...

 

[excaza]

No

Intellectual honesty at its finest. Until you're willing to back up your nano-thermite assertion with....anything, it's completely baseless. There's as much weight to that as there is to me asserting the moon is made of cheese.

Google nano-thermite paper.

You're the one claiming you have proof, where is it? Where is your proof that nanothermite produces iron spheres and/or nano-thermite is the only mechanism that can produce them in bulk?

The background dust contained about .04% iron microspheres.

My trash can contains 100% peanut shells.

 

[Sabretooth]

...A clap of thunder, a shock wave ripping thru the building and all the windows busted out.

A clap of thunder and shockwave nobody heard or felt or was picked up by the dozens of video cameras surrounding the area.

Do you actually analyse your opinion to conclusion before you start typing?

 

[Sabretooth]

The hotter a fire burns, the faster it uses up it's fuel supply. An office fire can only burn at max temperatures for about 20 minutes.

Holy ****... where did you get this piece of utter nonsense? You do realize that me and a few others here are actually real live firemen and have real live training in fire science...right? LOL!

Your posts are getting dumber as we move along...

 

[Christopher7]

A clap of thunder and shockwave nobody heard or felt or was picked up by the dozens of video cameras surrounding the area.

A trial denial? Give it up.

I posted a video that has the sound of an explosion just before the east penthouse falls. I have posted videos of numerous survivors describing explosions. There is evidence of explosions, your denial notwithstanding.

mañana

 

[Sabretooth]

The buildings need not be large to block the sound of explosions on the lower floors. You are grasping at straws.

Yet another fail at understanding physics, Chris. Aren't you getting the hint yet?

http://en.wikipedia.org/Soundwave

 

[BadBoy]

You know nothing about what nano-thermite can do so stop making false statements like that.

are yes, but neither do you because its top secret hu?

 

[BigAl]

A trial denial? Give it up.

I posted a video that has the sound of an explosion just before the east penthouse falls. I have posted videos of numerous survivors describing explosions. There is evidence of explosions, your denial notwithstanding.

mañana

Lots of people heard lots of explosions.

There were no eyewitnesses reports of noises or noises on video that are consistent in timing, loudness or brisance with man-made demolition.