Merged Two Mosques to be built near Ground Zero

amb said:
You would accept money from cold blooded murderers for your pet project?
Where's the feeling of outrage of such an idea?
Isn't that rubbing salt into the wounds of the victims of 9/11 loved ones?
Click to expand...

what moeny do you talk about? pls including evidence.
 
that Ground Zero mosque is very usefull, it keeps exposing bigots.
 
amb said:
The money this inman is raising in the Middle East to build his bloody mosque.

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

mmh i guess i did wait for nothing, you dont plan to deliver the evidence for you claim?
 
If my hatred of religion, and especially islam makes me a bigot. Hey! I'm happy to wear that. :D
 
amb said:
The money this inman is raising in the Middle East to build his bloody mosque.

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Of course, if you actually looking at what he is really planning to build, you´d find something that is quite different from what you and other bigots claim.

But then, if you were that obsessive about facts and reality, you´d have noticed by now that there is no such thing as an "inman", any more than there is a Pretzeldent of the United States.
 
Chaos said:
Of course, if you actually looking at what he is really planning to build, you´d find something that is quite different from what you and other bigots claim.

But then, if you were that obsessive about facts and reality, you´d have noticed by now that there is no such thing as an "inman", any more than there is a Pretzeldent of the United States.
Click to expand...

Brezel-dent? there was one of those :D
 
DC said:
ROFLMAO islamification..... are they planing to replace the Whitehouse with a mega Mosque.
Click to expand...

I can picture the Brazilian carnival (Brazil is part of the west, right?) being replace by a moderate version of women dressing ninja's cloths and praying in to Mecca's direction during the contest...

Oh yeah... Islam, a threat to the western world, indeed.

Please, someone should call Clint Eastwood to save the west!

:Banane26:
 
Last edited:
amb said:
No comparison. Those events probably saved the the lives of up to a million American soldiers lives had they had to invade the islands of Japan itself one by one. There was no sign that the Japanese were about to surrender. This furphy is often trotted out by the left to imply that only America ever used atomic bombs on another country.
Click to expand...

But only America did use atomic bombs on another country.

There is nothing to 'imply'.
 
DC said:
no thats fine, its the lies you spread that make you a bigoted nutjob.
Click to expand...

I'm spreading lies? I'm the f.......... nut job? Take a look in the mirror buddy!

Bleeding bloody hearts make me sick.
 
amb said:
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2010/August/Islamization-of-Paris-a-Warning-to-the-West/

I presume no one here sees anything wrong with this CBS news article ?
Click to expand...

As was already pointed out, the citation is from the Christian Broadcasting Network. Furthermore, you are citing a piece filled with opinion1 rather than facts. A large chunk is devoted to analyzing a novel. That means it is not a news article - it is an editorial.



One day your grandchildren will ask why we let Islamification of the West happen without so much as a whimper.
Click to expand...

And we will say, "it was because of the U.S. Constitution which forbad the U.S. government from treating religions differently in any way." Of course, you have already called the Constitution outdated but you continue to refuse to explain what needs to be done to update it. Come on, Amb, have the courage of your convictions - tell us how you would change federal law to prevent the Islamification of the U.S.

Of course the other answer to the question that the grandchildren will be asking is "WTF are you talking about - there has been no Islamification of the West?!" Amb, can you cite a single national law in the U.S. or France that indicates that the Islamification of the West has begun? Furthermore, even if the Islamification of the West has begun, why would you describe the huge backlash against the ground-zero mosque as "without a whimper"? And why would you describe France's no-burqa law as "without a whimper"?






..................................
1) e.g.
The Muslims in the street have been granted unofficial rights that no Christian group is likely to get under France's Laicite', or secularism law.

From the 1980s until recently, criticizing or opposing Islam was considered a social taboo, and so the government and media effectively helped Islam spread throughout France.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
amb said:
I'm spreading lies? I'm the f.......... nut job? Take a look in the mirror buddy!

Bleeding bloody hearts make me sick.
Click to expand...

then backup your claim of blood money, or retract that lie.
 
amb said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Europe

Read the last paragraph.
Click to expand...

Foreign Policy

Some think-tanks such as the CEE Council have argued that the disenfranchisement of second-generation immigrants from South Asia and the Arab world could deepen in the future, essentially for ideological motives[62] such as the perceived imbalances of EU foreign policy in North Africa and the MENA area.
Click to expand...

that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom