Why do you think the holocaust story requires a Jewish conspiracy? How does this conspiracy work? Do you think that people believe the Jews have made up all those photos and all those testimonies and all the trials, etc out of nothing? If you're Jewish, it's awfully arrogant for you to think that the world believes you guys are that powerful.
This whole conspiracy routine is a strawman and a way for you to avoid the facts. I understand your need to have a Jewish conspiracy at the root of holocaust revisionism. It's much easier to dismiss that way.
Here's your assignment: Tell me how holocaust revisionism requires a conspiracy. Tell me how this conspiracy works, who is in on it. when it started, etc. And tell me why it was done. Why did the conspirators choose to fabricate six million deaths and a master plan and gas chambers? Why not ten million deaths? Why didn't it happen between 1920 and 1925? Why didn't it use laser beams instead of gas chambers?
Do this and you'll see how your conspiracy theory falls apart. You might even see how the traditional holocaust story requires nothing more than normal wartime anti-enemy propaganda, lying about your political enemies and explaining ordinary happenings as something sinister.
And, btw, holocaust revisionism isn't about the Jews. It has nothing to do with the Jews. Get off your self-importance kick.
The basic proof of the Holocaust has since 1945 been regarded as the statements of
German eyewitnesses and the evidence of captured
German documents.
The traditional Holocaust denier explanation for these inconvenient pieces of evidence is to allege a massive campaign of coercion/torture and systematic forgery of documents en masse.
If you say that 'revisionism'
hasn't alleged torture and forgery then you're flat-out lying. Only the identity of the 'hoaxers' changes - for the more rabid nutzis, it is axiomatically Them, the Jooz, and for the slightly more sophisticated, we get a throwback to 1952 and McCarthyism - it's the Reds - coupled with conspiranoid insinuations against British and US agencies.
Yeah, yeah, there are a few nutters who seem to think it was all some kind of 'hystory' that grew organically out of rumours, but even Crowell - the chief exponent of the 'hystory' nonsense - starts alleging coercion and forgery after 1945. As does Mattogno.
The simple fact is that unless you are going to claim hoax-by-telepathy, different sources - witnesses and documents - which ended up on either side of the Iron Curtain report on the same micro-details that were not publicised at the end of the war. That's why an SS captain and a Polish Sonderkommando can simultaneously identify the first gas chambers at Birkenau as the 'Bunkers' immediately after the end of the war, using a term that had nowhere appeared in any previous report. Since the SS captain actually left Auschwitz in August 1943, we can hopefully rule out a conspiracy between Aumeier and Dragon to repeat the same claim.
But if you allege - as Mattogno idiotically does - that "the Poles" got on the phone to "the British" and passed on this insignificant little matter of nomenclature, then you've got a conspiracy. End of story.
We can repeat this endlessly for virtually every aspect of the Holocaust, and from multiple provenances, including introducing the 1944 intelligence reports of neutral nations like Switzerland which give chapter and verse on the Einsatzgruppen, gas vans and Auschwitz, conveying specific details that were not publicised until after the war, like who was involved in the evolution of gas vans (Artur Nebe, the head of the Kripo).
So it's either conspiracy, or the evidence matches, in which case bye-bye revisionism.
