Deeper than primes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Little 10 Toes said:
Yes, doronshadmi is trying to create something, but I wouldn't call it science. The problems that he has are that he can't explain clearly how it works, what it is, what good is it, or how to use it. He keeps introducing new terms without defining them, drops old terms that he hasn't defined, use extra words when just one or two will do, and give us proper definitions. He'll use words that already have a standard definition, and use them in his own way.

With me, he has taken about 10 pages to define something. It's mainly because he won't answer me. I've had to ask the same question about seven times.

If I remember correctly, he's even killed a thread that had nothing to do with his "idea".
Click to expand...

Why you keep repeating yourself, if you cannot have a answer?

Sorry to say, but the world do not adapt to our expectations.

This mean that if Doron did not answer until now, he/she will keep ignoring you, even if you reach the thousand prize number.

You are doing like a mental ill man, which insist to an wall to answer his questions about bricks.

I do not mean you are wrong and Doron right. Please, do not interpret this comment in a "binary" way.

I just giving you a advice, if you want really help with consistent information to this thread.

:D

Perhaps you can give me a explanation what is prime numbers and how much different this is from the "organic numbers" in Doron's theory.

I will be glad in learn something new.
 
doronshadmi said:
OM does it by distinguish between the magnitude of existence of a given concept and the magnitude of existence of that concept as one of the members of that concept.
Click to expand...
A magnitude of existence is a peculiar term, coz things just exist or they don't. You may consider "a magnitude of occurrence" instead. Earthquakes hit or they don't, but when they do, you can measure their magnitude. But if you feel that you exist more than someone else, then keep your terminology intact.

(Terminology is a scientific field that concerns itself with the study of termites -- it's a branch of Bugology.)
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
Since you can't answer to the question "who is I?" you also have no ability to define the concept of Measurement, which is at least the linkage among the measured and the measurer.
Click to expand...

Pick your choice:

1) http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6264915#post6264915

2) Why does it matter who I am when your mom or the scale is doing the measuring?

3) Since you can't answer the question that I asked first, "Who/What is the measurer" you have no ability to understand simple questions.

4) You never mentioned "the concept of Measurement" until now. Whose fault is that when I have asked over six times "Who/What is the measurer"?

5) How can we determine the "linkage" when you can't explain who/what the measurer is?

6) I already have answered the question of "Who is I". And you never have explained why I need to answer "Who is I".
 
Last edited:
Here is an improved version of a little game.

It is called "The Source\Target Game".

It is played along a closed curve as follows:

1) The curve is a closed playground such that there is at least one player along it.

2) The players are points, such that each point is a source of one and only one target along the closed curve.

3) Reverse ordering is not allowed in this game, so it must be played in a certain direction along the closed curve.

4) The game is started by using an arbitrary player as a source of some target.

5) The game is completed only if each point along the closed curve is both a source AND a target.

By following the rules of this game, it is completed if there is a finite amount of players along the closed curve.

By following the rules of this game, please provide a proof that the game is completed (each point is source AND target) also if there is an infinite amount of players along the closed curve.
 
Last edited:
A correction of http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6291665&postcount=11399.

Type theory "avoids Russell's paradox by first creating a hierarchy of types, then assigning each mathematical (and possibly other) entity to a type. Objects of a given type are built exclusively from objects of preceding types (those lower in the hierarchy), thus preventing loops." ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_theory ).

OM does it by distinguish between the magnitude of existence of a given concept and the magnitude of existence of any given member of that concept.

For example the magnitude of existence of the concept of concepts, notated as C(), extends the magnitude of existence of a given member of the concept of concepts, notated as C(C()).

So the concept of concepts is not idendical to any one of its members.
 
Last edited:
The Man said:
the negation of 0 is 0
Click to expand...

If the entire universe is 0 , the negation of 0 is what is between {}.

If 0 is one of the given things of a given universe, then ~0 is "anything but" 0.

In both cases the output is different than the input.

Your notion of Negation is limited to the concept of opposites.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
If the entire universe is 0 , the negation of 0 is what is between {}.

If 0 is one of the given things of a given universe, then ~0 is "anything but" 0.

In both cases the output is different than the input.

Your notion of Negation is limited to the concept of opposites.
Click to expand...

In the above post you claim The Man said, "the negation of 0 is 0" without linking to the original message. Please provide proof that The Man said it.
 
doronshadmi said:
Get the universe of the challenge.

Any challenge needs a universe in order to be expressed.
Click to expand...
The challenge was, is, and always will be to predict the movement of the planets of the universe.

And away they go... Venus stumbled at the gate.
Saturn takes the lead in the clubhouse turn...
Halfway down the backstretch, Saturn continues to lead the field by a length. Jupiter is second, Mars is third, four lengths behind the leader...
Going into the far turn, Jupiter is closing on Saturn -- both jockeys didn't ask their charges yet...
And down the stretch they come! Saturn on the inside, Jupiter on the outside -- head'n'head they go... And here comes Mercury from behind like an EXpress TRain! It's Mercury moooooving like a winner!
At the wire: it's Mercury followed by Jupiter and Saturn. Neptune finished fourth.


Pick4........1,5,6,8........$1022.80

To the windows we go now...
:D
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom