• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

There is not a single mass grave of holohoax victims.

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is no point to concede.

The sane people know from the evidence and testimony produced by both sides that the bodies initially buried at Treblinka were exhumed and burned, and so were the subsequent corpses, in their hundreds of thousands, producing a vast amount of ash, as documented. You know that and we know that.

So your claim that there was no holocaust because there are no mass graves there is as defiantly idiotic as claiming man never went to the moon because the astronauts aren't there now.

What kind of imbecile do you think could take your 'argument' seriously?
I agree but would add - The efforts to exhume and burn all the human remains weren't successful. There are still more or less in tact human remains in mass graves at the sites of former Reinhardt extermination camps as well. In addition to burnt remains and ashes.

For whose benefit Saggy's act is performed is just about the only question remaining.

It starts by claiming there isn't a single one but morphs into looking for excuses for the ones that are inevitably presented. Anything to keep denying.
 
I don't really like how Israel has been handling it's affairs in the Middle East, but.. why the need to deny the historical fact that Hitler reallly did try to exterminate them?
 
I don't really like how Israel has been handling it's affairs in the Middle East, but.. why the need to deny the historical fact that Hitler reallly did try to exterminate them?

Which is what I am trying to clear up. He might be relieved that it didn't happen because he thinks, with everybody else, that it would have been a really, really bad thing.
 
"No. Only two and one half million — the rest died from disease and starvation."

An excerpt from Hoss's trial where he's quibbling over how many people he had murdered. Your opinion on the value of his confession is of no importance.
 
This isn't a Mayday thread.
No, and neither is it a breaking of the Lenten fast thread. ;)

Most Roman Catholics don't realize that Lent ends at 9:00AM Holy/Maundy Thursday. Just in time for Danish and coffee and just in time for your Italian boss to blow off the weekly production meeting.
 
No, and neither is it a breaking of the Lenten fast thread. ;)

Most Roman Catholics don't realize that Lent ends at 9:00AM Holy/Maundy Thursday. Just in time for Danish and coffee and just in time for your Italian boss to blow off the weekly production meeting.

:confused:
 
Saggy is it your opinion that it is a good thing that the holocaust didn't happen, or a bad thing that it didn't happen?


You keep coming back with ludicrous posts, but carefully ignore this simple question.

What is so hard about this?

He won't tell us why he hates Jews either.
 
Read the Auschwitz museum web site ...


In general, the people whom the Nazis deported to Auschwitz were either

1. murdered immediately upon arriving in Auschwitz

...or....

2. registered in the camp


The Nazis wrote a death certificate when a registered prisoner died and the deaths were summarized in death books. These records show that more
Roman Catholics died at Auschwitz than Jews, and that the total number of deaths were on the order of 60,000. Thus, the hoax deaths all occurred immediately on arrival.

HTH

In general, the people whom the Nazis deported to Auschwitz were either

murdered immediately upon arriving in Auschwitz – they never became prisoners in the camp, and their data were not entered in the camp files. Rudimentary information about them is available on the basis of resistance movement material and the transport lists drawn up by the Nazis in the occupied countries from which they sent people to Auschwitz.

Franciszek Piper, head of the Historical Research Department and author of the book How Many People Died in Auschwitz, estimates that slightly over 900,000 people were exterminated immediately after arrival, without being registered. The majority of them, almost 900,000, were Jews, the majority of whom professed Judaism. Also unregistered were some 10,000 Poles, 2,000 Roma, and 3,000 Soviet POWs; Catholicism was the religion of the majority of these unregistered non-Jews.
*

registered in the camp after completing the registration procedures – over the period when the camp was in operation, from June 1940 through January 1945, there were over 400,000 prisoners. Half of them were Jews and professed Judaism. Of the other 200,000 prisoners, about 150,000 were Poles, and the predominant denomination was therefore Roman Catholicism.

Why do you quote mine? It's not healthy.
 
@Saggy

What if I tell you that you are wrong and I can proof it? Would you then maybe comment on the other remarks I did and acknowledge that you are ********ting?

Btw: If you didn't know it: The memorials write their texts for visitors, so they are focussed on giving short information and not telling you the whole story on WW II but just giving you very basic facts. Between May and June 1944 about 500.000 jews were arriving from Hungary. Birkenau did not have the capacities to kill them all in line - your fellow deniers will as well proof that. They will proof as well that they were not registered in the camp.

What about reading books instead of reading webpages and feeble-minded denier prospects, hm? And now please comment on my post. I am waiting.

Best regards,
Lara
 
P.S.: I read the publications of Pressac and Pieper. I read others. And I read critics on that. You didn't, but I wouldn't advise you to do so. Its easy to see you are not interested in knowing what happened but to support your own tiny story. There have been much better and sophisticated deniers. You are anything like that.
 
Last edited:
Saggy seems to be under the impression that his opinion of the evidence matters. Let me break this down for you. The views of Nazis don't count like the views of people. The opinion of a Nazi doesn't matter as it's not exactly a secret that Nazis have a deficit when it comes to integrity and honesty. In short, your claims don't matter because you can't be trusted to tell the truth. It's kind of amusing that you pretend to act like a historian much the way a five-year-old puts on his father's suit jackets and pretends at being a businessman. That's all it is though, pretend. You don't bring up valid issues and you don't understand the history you're trying to warp.
 
Saggy seems to be under the impression that his opinion of the evidence matters. Let me break this down for you. The views of Nazis don't count like the views of people. The opinion of a Nazi doesn't matter as it's not exactly a secret that Nazis have a deficit when it comes to integrity and honesty. In short, your claims don't matter because you can't be trusted to tell the truth. It's kind of amusing that you pretend to act like a historian much the way a five-year-old puts on his father's suit jackets and pretends at being a businessman. That's all it is though, pretend. You don't bring up valid issues and you don't understand the history you're trying to warp.

This^^^^

Aligning one's self with the most reviled regime in the history of the Earth give credence to the old saying, "Lay down with the dogs, get up with fleas."
 
Why do you quote mine? It's not healthy.

It's the only way he can make his arguments work. See his exchange with me up above; he tried to use a witness to cremations at Treblinka as an argument that there were no cremations at Treblinka :boggled:. The only way he can make his arguments fly is to delete details refuting his stance from his quote selections. Thus, the quote mining.

Lying can involved selectively deleting truth. That's what Saggy's doing here.
 
No fair asking him for an honest opinion. He's saving that cherry for something special.

And only the forum rules and my desire to remain here keep me from responding directly, accurately and appropriately to that one!! Please don't help me with another that begs an add-on!!!:D:D:D:D:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp
 
Well, I'm a little disappointed and even a little surprised that there is nothing worth responding to from the flack.

Here's a starting point if anyone would like to look for a holohoax mass grave .......

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_graves_in_the_Soviet_Union

They do list at least one hoax mass grave, at Babi Yar, so these mass graves are not limited to victims of the NKVD, although I believe that all the mass graves that been excavated are NKVD victims, e.g. Bykivni.

Good hunting.
 
Bless, the testimony of the likes of Friedrich von der Heydte must really upset you, eh?
 
Well, I'm a little disappointed and even a little surprised that there is nothing worth responding to from the flack.

Have you really perfected your confirmation bias to the point where you don't realize that the sources you quote mine actually refute you?

Simply amazing.
 
"Well, I'm a little disappointed and even a little surprised that there is nothing worth responding to from the flack."

rofl.gif
rofl.gif
rofl.gif
rofl.gif
rofl.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom