• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Insane Clown Posse's song about 'Miracles' called worst song ever

Really? You don't think the ignorance and promotion of ignorance would be mentioned? (It's also worth pointing out why expectations of the artists are different with the artist's background, audience, and usual lyrical content. Context is rather important.)

lol, seriously? How about the comic book industry? You ever seen Superman? It's about an alien with super powers he gets from the sun and certain minerals. This one time, he flew around the World super fast and caused the Earth to spin backwards, and get this time went backwards.

Can you imagine someone promoting that kind of ignorance of basic science? Oh Noes, protect the children!

There's a TV show called Fringe, I love it. But I can't watch it because they promote ignorance. In order for it to be entertaining you have to ignore just about everything we currently know about science. And nobody wants to promote that.

You may want to look up this thing called "creative license" :cool:

You're the one putting words in people's mouth. We have quotes from ICP on the subject, quotes where they try to explain the song and their views on "how things work". I posted several interviews with them in this thread.

Listen, I'm going to this to you in 3 words. "Ignorance is bliss".


Please provide evidence that they are not serious.

lol, I think the real problem is that you can't separate reality from fiction.

A general rule of thumb: People dressed up as clowns aren't to be taken seriously.

That's advice that has served me well. I've expanded that to include people in costumes as well as actors in general.
 
If ICP's whole shtick is some kind of joke, then why does practically none of their own fan base seem to be in on it?

Perhaps because their fan base is either a) too stoned, b) too drunk, or c) too stupid to notice anything as subtle as satire?

I hope the ICP go down in flames. They suck.
 
Last edited:
Considering we're pretty much materialists here, I'm a bit boggled that we're arguing about their intended meaning as opposed to the effect.

if Charles Manson had said in later interviews "I didn't actually want them to go out and kill people, it was all satire" it wouldn't really exhonerate him, in fact it would make him worse in my opinion.

The bottom line is the way this song is taken by the fan base, which seems to be in a real anti science way. The "real" intent doesn't much matter.
 
lol, seriously? How about the comic book industry? You ever seen Superman? It's about an alien with super powers he gets from the sun and certain minerals. This one time, he flew around the World super fast and caused the Earth to spin backwards, and get this time went backwards.

Can you imagine someone promoting that kind of ignorance of basic science? Oh Noes, protect the children!

There's a TV show called Fringe, I love it. But I can't watch it because they promote ignorance. In order for it to be entertaining you have to ignore just about everything we currently know about science. And nobody wants to promote that.

I am not talking about the comic book industry nor am I talking about the music industry. I am talking about ICP, something specific not an overly broad industry.

You seem to be arguing two different things: They don't mean what they say (promoting ignorance) and they promote ignorance. You might clear this up by actually addressing issues raised then bringing up analogies that have nothing to do with the topic.

You may want to look up this thing called "creative license" :cool:

Well, aware of it. I am asking YOU to support your argument with evidence and am asking why you are dismissing evidence.

Listen, I'm going to this to you in 3 words. "Ignorance is bliss".

Wait, so you are saying ICP are serious then? They do admit they are ignorant and its a good quality? If so, then you agree we take ICP at their word.

lol, I think the real problem is that you can't separate reality from fiction.

Thanks for telling me what my problem is even though you know nothing about me. I'll look into it. In the meantime, can you give a coherent argument about the topic at hand and support it with evidence? Can you focus on the issue?

A general rule of thumb: People dressed up as clowns aren't to be taken seriously.

That's advice that has served me well. I've expanded that to include people in costumes as well as actors in general.
I don't think anyone, but their fans take them seriously. Reasonable people won't take ignorance and/or stupidity seriously.

Might I point out, on Violent J's blog, he writes about the "Miracles" song to his fans:

I love this side of ICP and I think it’s important to who we are. It shows our depth, I believe. We’ve been doing songs like this from time to time since way back with “Joke Ya Mind”. Every once and a while we throw a meaningful song in our mix. Once again it’s a softer tune, because were talking to Juggalos on this one. It’s like a direct conversation. ...
...
We understand if your not feeling it though. We know it’s way different and all that. But if you can open your mind enough to see a miracle out of a lightning bug, than maybe you can open your mind enough to dig this song.

ICP believe the song is deep and express that to their fans. They believe the song has meaning.

I think we are in agreement about taking ICP seriously, but I think it's the irony factor and you think it's intentional.

My above post's questions above are quite clear. Do feel free to go to my above post and respond to the substance.

You are defending ICP by ignoring their own words and explanations, but at the same time fail to offer any evidence to dismiss their words.

Let me ask you another question: Do you agree with ICP's Violent J, that the Miracles song shows ICP's "depth" and that is is a "meaningful" song?
 
Last edited:
I am not talking about the comic book industry nor am I talking about the music industry. I am talking about ICP, something specific not an overly broad industry.

That probably isn't the right thing to do. They're entertainers not educators. There's a different standard expected of different groups. If you are turning to an entertainer to help make life decisions you may want to reconsider.

You seem to be arguing two different things: They don't mean what they say (promoting ignorance) and they promote ignorance. You might clear this up by actually addressing issues raised then bringing up analogies that have nothing to do with the topic.

You have to separate the persona that is Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope from the people Joseph Bruce and Joseph Utsler. The band will say whatever they think will sell records and get people to the show.

Well, aware of it. I am asking YOU to support your argument with evidence and am asking why you are dismissing evidence.

You obviously haven't read any of the links I've provided.

Thanks for telling me what my problem is even though you know nothing about me. I'll look into it. In the meantime, can you give a coherent argument about the topic at hand and support it with evidence? Can you focus on the issue?

I know you are having trouble separating the fictional characters that are ICP from the people. You've provided enough evidence of that here for me to make this observation. I'm pointing this out so you can make a more informed decision.

I don't think anyone, but their fans take them seriously. Reasonable people won't take ignorance and/or stupidity seriously.

This thread would suggest otherwise.

Might I point out, on Violent J's blog, he writes about the "Miracles" song to his fans:

ICP believe the song is deep and express that to their fans. They believe the song has meaning.

I think we are in agreement about taking ICP seriously, but I think it's the irony factor and you think it's intentional.

My above post's questions above are quite clear. Do feel free to go to my above post and respond to the substance.

You are defending ICP by ignoring their own words and explanations, but at the same time fail to offer any evidence to dismiss their words.

Let me ask you another question: Do you agree with ICP's Violent J, that the Miracles song shows ICP's "depth" and that is is a "meaningful" song?

I'm sorry you need to be more clear, what am I dismissing exactly? I've given links that clearly indicate ICP believe they used the word "miracle" incorrectly, that they realize there are scientific explanations for everything, but that science removes some of the mysticism from things that keeps people fascinated.

As far as ICP goes yes, this song has more depth and certainly has more meaning than most.

A question for you, do you think that ICP the band or even just the 2 Joes actually believe the scientists are lying? I personally see it as a clear indication they are joking. I'm genuinely confused how people can take this as anything but tongue in cheek.
 
That probably isn't the right thing to do. They're entertainers not educators. There's a different standard expected of different groups. If you are turning to an entertainer to help make life decisions you may want to reconsider.

You have to separate the persona that is Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope from the people Joseph Bruce and Joseph Utsler. The band will say whatever they think will sell records and get people to the show.

Strawman. No one here said ICP and/or the Josephs were educators. The song and recent events simply shows they are not-too-smart rappers with an underground following of like-minded people.

Please help me out. When a post on Violent J's blog to the Juggalos says the Miracles song is deep and meaningful, is he serious? (Below you say he is.) Or is that a character you want to dismiss as "saying whatever they think to sell records" and not to be taken seriously? (Also below you say they are.) If it is a character, do the Juggalos know that? And how do you know that? (Please support your argument with evidence, I'm not interested in any further conjecture from you that isn't supported.)

You obviously haven't read any of the links I've provided.

Ditto. Did you read the "barely literate" interview or the several interviews I've posted in this thread for months? Note that ICP didn't deny that label of "barely literate" and said ignorance is better than knowledge.

I know you are having trouble separating the fictional characters that are ICP from the people. You've provided enough evidence of that here for me to make this observation. I'm pointing this out so you can make a more informed decision.

Fictional characters can't be serious or carry serious themes? (See my above questions in this post and your below quote where you take the character at face value. You contradicted yourself.)

Sorry, but you provided nothing of the sort. The interviews I posted show they are proud of the song and stand by its preaching ignorance theme.

No, you haven't. In fact, I haven't heard a coherent argument at all.

This thread would suggest otherwise.

I'll spell it out. "Magnets how do they work?" ICP are quite serious, but reasonable people don't take the act or the people behind the characters seriously because, as Martin Bashir said, its music by and for the barely literate.

You seem to not gasp what several others have said above.

I'm sorry you need to be more clear, what am I dismissing exactly? I've given links that clearly indicate ICP believe they used the word "miracle" incorrectly, that they realize there are scientific explanations for everything, but that science removes some of the mysticism from things that keeps people fascinated.

You haven't formed a coherent argument this entire time.

That's not the issue. The point is they don't actually care to know the explanations (no kidding they admit there are explanations. They've been mocked and confronted with the explanations many times since the song was released. Did you read my first post in the thread?) and they encourage others to be ignorant because its more "fun" (or as Violent J said "funner").

The point of this thread is the song is horrible, infantile, ignorant and preaches ignorance under the guise of "Miracles". If you like that and others do too, fine.

Please clarify: Are you claiming the song and subsequent interviews preaching ignorance are part of a joke? Are you disagreeing with ICP's own words and saying the song isn't deep and that it lacks actual meaning?

As far as ICP goes yes, this song has more depth and certainly has more meaning than most.

So it is serious for ICP? Its not a joke from ICP? So the character writing as Violent J should have his words taken seriously? (It seems you are having a hard time distinguishing between the characters and the people as well as reality and fiction. You want to dismiss their words claiming its a character only when it reflects poorly on them. If you didn't accept/reject how their words came across based on how you want them represented then you'd see the irony ICP aren't in on. That's the irony I explained earlier regarding why people don't take them seriously. It's also the irony that many of their fans may not be in on either.)

Your argument is all over the place.

A question for you, do you think that ICP the band or even just the 2 Joes actually believe the scientists are lying? I personally see it as a clear indication they are joking. I'm genuinely confused how people can take this as anything but tongue in cheek.

Plenty of conspiracy theorists and creationists, this includes "average Joes," claim scientists lie. Dozens of US Senators claim scientists are lying about global warming. If you accept the reality of global warming, but like some of the US Senators who claim its a hoax then maybe you'd claim the Senators are joking? The Glenn Becks of the world say the email hack proves scientists are lying. Many creationists claim scientists lie about evolution. Many anti-intellectuals claim scientists lie! Yet, you think those words are evidence people are joking and not anti-intellectual.

Sometimes those people get discussed on the JREF board, such as others like ICP who do similar things. If another band preached nonsense, I'd discuss it too. ( Go here for my discussion on Van Halen cancer's conspiracy. Maybe you think Eddie's joking too?)

Your "personal" beliefs are not of interest here. You are ignoring the obvious and a collection of data that points to some serious irony that ICP is not in on.

To take the song and their representations of the song as "tongue in cheek" would require the above double-think that your post displayed. There is no reason, other than being a fan of the music ahead of time wanting to defend these guys, to believe their words in the song do anything, but point to sheer willingful ignorance.
 
Last edited:
Your argument is all over the place.

In 1993-1994 a few friends of mine had a band and they recorded at The Disc in Detroit. I met Joseph Bruce and Joseph Utsler several times and they were average guys (big boisterous American, Detroit dudes). I didn't know they were ICP until my buddy told me. I didn't even listen to their music until several years later when another buddy introduced me to them. It was one of those "Who's this?" "ICP" "Seriously?, I met these guys" and the novelty of having met them kind of stuck with me.

ICP, Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope are all fake. Nothing they say should be taken seriously. Unless you see a quote directly attributed to Joseph Bruce or Joseph Utsler it should be taken with a grain of salt and put in the context of having come from a persona. Even then you need to make sure they don't have their face paint on and they're not just fronting the band and the author just used their real names.

FAKE. Like Big Foot and Nessie. If Big Foot registered an account here and started talking trash about Nessie and then Nessie came here and started talking trash about Big Foot what would you do? What if Big Foot started talking about science and saying how wonderful the World was because there were giraffes and polar bears and cryptids? Would you take anything they said seriously? Would you actually debate with Big Foot like he existed as Big Foot? As crazy at that sounds that's basically what I'm seeing here. "Big Foot should be stopped from scaring people!" "We need to stop Big Foot before he hurts someone" It's bizarre :boggled:

Welcome to the Dark Carnival. ;)
 
Your silence on your contradictions is noted.

As crazy at that sounds that's basically what I'm seeing here.
Yep, your crazy analogy does sound crazy. You set up a wild analogy for that reason. I'm going repeat what I wrote earlier about not taking ICP seriously:

"I think we are in agreement about taking ICP seriously, but I think it's the irony factor and you think it's intentional."

and this:
"Many anti-intellectuals claim scientists lie! Yet, you think those words are evidence people are joking and not anti-intellectual."

I think this conversation has ran its course. You want to tell us about meeting ICP 16-17 years ago, rather than giving an argument and supporting it with evidence.
 
Your silence on your contradictions is noted.

NB-I have no idea what you are talking about.

Yep, your crazy analogy does sound crazy. You set up a wild analogy for that reason. I'm going repeat what I wrote earlier about not taking ICP seriously:

"I think we are in agreement about taking ICP seriously, but I think it's the irony factor and you think it's intentional."

NO WE AREN'T IN AGREEMENT! ICP IS NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. What's so hard to understand?

and this:
"Many anti-intellectuals claim scientists lie! Yet, you think those words are evidence people are joking and not anti-intellectual."

Wow, this is just dense. PEOPLE IN CLOWN MAKE-UP AREN'T TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. You continue to compare guys dressed up acting out a persona with real people. This has run it's course, you can't separate real people from characters.
 
I'm with 3bodyproblem on this one.

This quote shows you exactly how seriously they take themselves and any discussion of science:

"Science can be real exciting but I'd rather get what we call p***y. Know what I'm saying?"

They are being silly. They don't care. They totally don't care.
 
Last edited:
3bodyproblem, you really need to re-read the posts.

NB-I have no idea what you are talking about.

I'll repost what I wrote and let me know what sentences you don't understand:

...
Please help me out. When a post on Violent J's blog to the Juggalos says the Miracles song is deep and meaningful, is he serious? (Below you say he is.) Or is that a character you want to dismiss as "saying whatever they think to sell records" and not to be taken seriously? (Also below you say they are.) If it is a character, do the Juggalos know that? And how do you know that? (Please support your argument with evidence, I'm not interested in any further conjecture from you that isn't supported.)
...
Fictional characters can't be serious or carry serious themes? (See my above questions in this post and your below quote where you take the character at face value. You contradicted yourself.)
...
So it is serious for ICP? Its not a joke from ICP? So the character writing as Violent J should have his words taken seriously? (It seems you are having a hard time distinguishing between the characters and the people as well as reality and fiction. You want to dismiss their words claiming its a character only when it reflects poorly on them. If you didn't accept/reject how their words came across based on how you want them represented then you'd see the irony ICP aren't in on. That's the irony I explained earlier regarding why people don't take them seriously. It's also the irony that many of their fans may not be in on either.)
...
Plenty of conspiracy theorists and creationists, this includes "average Joes," claim scientists lie. Dozens of US Senators claim scientists are lying about global warming. If you accept the reality of global warming, but like some of the US Senators who claim its a hoax then maybe you'd claim the Senators are joking? The Glenn Becks of the world say the email hack proves scientists are lying. Many creationists claim scientists lie about evolution. Many anti-intellectuals claim scientists lie! Yet, you think those words are evidence people are joking and not anti-intellectual.

NO WE AREN'T IN AGREEMENT! ICP IS NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. What's so hard to understand?


You don't take ICP seriously
I don't take ICP seriously.
Therefore, we are in agreement. ICP is not to be taken seriously.

I don't take them seriously because they are idiots who don't know what they are talking about (irony they are not in on). You say its intentionally a joke.

(I've said this THREE times and you haven't understood it!)

(I think ICP's career is a joke, but in a clearly different manner than you mean.)

Wow, this is just dense. PEOPLE IN CLOWN MAKE-UP AREN'T TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. You continue to compare guys dressed up acting out a persona with real people. This has run it's course, you can't separate real people from characters.

As said above, reasonable people don't take them seriously. It has nothing to do with the make-up or the persona. They are idiots. They are a joke. The song is bad. I've seen no proof any of that is intentional.
 
Last edited:
I'm with 3bodyproblem on this one.

This quote shows you exactly how seriously they take themselves and any discussion of science:

"Science can be real exciting but I'd rather get what we call p***y. Know what I'm saying?"

They are being silly. They don't care. They totally don't care.

You don't think that statement is real? Why?

When Violent J says its "funner" to be ignorant why do you not take that as an expression of his beliefs? That clearly is the message of the song and the message in subsequent interviews.
 
Last edited:
Seriously - just stop trying to feed us a line about ICP actually being people who really like science and aren't stupid but are just pretending. Nobody buys it. This is a board for skeptics, and skepticism - we has it. From what I can tell, based on their own words, ICP is "just pretending" to revel in stupidity about as much as Pat Robertson is "just pretending" to be a homophobe. If you've got actual proof otherwise, put up or shut up.
 
I, for one, am shocked. I was expecting so much more from guys that dress up like clowns and record lyrics like:

Let me get a chicken sandwich with manwich
I'm finna wreck on a chicken neck
Chopping up Hilly and Billy Bob Billy
Cuz I chop mother****ing redneck silly
Peeked in his yard and what did I see
I seen a chicken boy *********** a sheep
I say "Mister Mister, what the **** you trying to do"
"a binny binny, binny boo"

Clearly they should abandon the whole music thing, go back to school, and resume their studies in rocket science.

I don't know, are any of us really shocked that these retards who parade around in clown makeup would record a song like that? For some reason, it seems about right to me. Like if someone asked me 3 years ago to guess who would someday record the stupidest song ever, ICP would definitely be somewhere on my list of potential answers. I can't say that I would have named them specifically, but I'm sure I would have considered them for at least a few seconds. Now if they someday release a song where they rap about all the elements on the periodic table, THEN I'll be shocked.

And while I hate to defend them, since when do people in music have a duty to promote intelligent or rational thinking? I think people have a right to say pretty much whatever they want, no matter how stupid or retarded it is. Just like we in turn have the right to mock them for it.
 
Last edited:
And while I hate to defend them, since when do people in music have a duty to promote intelligent or rational thinking? I think people have a right to say pretty much whatever they want, no matter how stupid or retarded it is. Just like we in turn have the right to mock them for it.

No one is saying they have a duty to promote education or rational thinking. The debate is between people who take their anti-intellectualism at face value, based on reams of clear evidence and the actions of the overwhelming majority of their fanbase; and people who claim that their anti-intellectualism is satirical and they're actually promoting education in some weird, twisted, completely invisible way. Duty doesn't enter into it.
 
Seriously - just stop trying to feed us a line about ICP actually being people who really like science and aren't stupid but are just pretending. Nobody buys it. This is a board for skeptics, and skepticism - we has it. From what I can tell, based on their own words, ICP is "just pretending" to revel in stupidity about as much as Pat Robertson is "just pretending" to be a homophobe. If you've got actual proof otherwise, put up or shut up.

Well said.

No one is saying they have a duty to promote education or rational thinking. The debate is between people who take their anti-intellectualism at face value, based on reams of clear evidence and the actions of the overwhelming majority of their fanbase; and people who claim that their anti-intellectualism is satirical and they're actually promoting education in some weird, twisted, completely invisible way. Duty doesn't enter into it.

Exactly.

3bodyproblem has been asked for evidence that they are just pretending to be anti-intellectual. He has openly ignored several people who pointed to evidence that its not satire, by simply writing "fail" or actually putting words in people's mouths to ignore their points instead of addressing evidence. In fact, many people have asked that poster to support his/her assertions, but that makes the conversation go in a other direction entirely. Then 3bodyproblem, who still hasn't backed up his/her point, asks,"Do you have any information that says ICP fans aren't average Americans?" instead of providing proof about his/her claims about income and education level of ICP fans, which originally started that particular discussion.

ETA one issue:

3bodyproblem wrote (bolded the issue at hand):
A question for you, do you think that ICP the band or even just the 2 Joes actually believe the scientists are lying? I personally see it as a clear indication they are joking. I'm genuinely confused how people can take this as anything but tongue in cheek.

I replied:
Plenty of conspiracy theorists and creationists, this includes "average Joes," claim scientists lie. Dozens of US Senators claim scientists are lying about global warming. If you accept the reality of global warming, but like some of the US Senators who claim its a hoax then maybe you'd claim the Senators are joking? The Glenn Becks of the world say the email hack proves scientists are lying. Many creationists claim scientists lie about evolution. Many anti-intellectuals claim scientists lie! Yet, you think those words are evidence people are joking and not anti-intellectual.

3body replied to that issue:
Wow, this is just dense. PEOPLE IN CLOWN MAKE-UP AREN'T TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. You continue to compare guys dressed up acting out a persona with real people. This has run it's course, you can't separate real people from characters.***

Still no word yet on how calling scientists "liars" (or clown make-up) proves ICP are pretending to be anti-intellectual.
1) Calling scientists liars is a popular theme of the Beck/Hovind/anti-intellectual crowd.
2) I don't see how being anti-intellectual and wearing clown make-up are mutually exclusive.
3) 3body admitted earlier ICP were sincere in the belief that the song is "deep." Thus, words of people in clown make-up can be serious.

Still no evidence the stupidity is all part of joke ICP created intentionally.

[***Editorial note: 3body first brought up "ICP the band or even just the 2 Joes," seemingly because he can't separate the two.]
 
Last edited:
ABC Nightline

ABC News Nightline with Martin Bashir on March 9, 2010



At 2:38 the transcript is:

Nightline said:
...
Martin Bashir: How do you write a line like: "From Pluto to your anus, we are underground famous"?

Violent J: "For doom and underway bass booms (in yo face)." That's dope, man. Welcome to the world of rap.

Bashir: Well isn't this almost prepubescent, barely literate music . . .

Violent J: Probably to you.

Bashir: Not to me. I'm asking you.

Shaggy2Dope: 'Cause you sound smart as a m**herf**ker.

Violent J: Maybe its not your cup of tea, of course its going to sound ridiculous to you. You know what I mean?
...

This is a very revealing exchange. You have a journalist ask about the lyrics, specifically about the maturity and literacy level behind it and ICP's defense is simply to argue such things are subjective.

ICP posted the "uncut" interview, which I assume they think it makes them look good. At 25:00 is the same section as quoted above. In the uncut version, ICP talks about how their songs are "deep" and could be considered "poetic":



In this post, Violent J explains that Miracles is a deep, meaningful song:
Violent J said:
Ripped from The Hatchet Herald Headlines:
The Buzz On “MIRACLES”
...
The song “Miracles” is classic ICP. Our listeners know we’ve always included one or two deep, meaningful songs on our albums, we’ve just never made a video for one until now. It was a good idea, obviously, ‘cause it’s got people talkin’. The truth is it don’t make us mad to see all the hate “Miracles” gets from the mainstream. We’ve been “The Most Hated Band in The World” for many years. Without all the hate on the outside, it wouldn’t be as warm as it is on the inside with the Juggalo Fam. Instead, all the hate “Miracles” generates makes us sad. Sad for the haters.
...

For those saying ICP is intentionally playing dumb (and/or pretending to be "barely literate"), where's the evidence?
 
Last edited:
Seriously - just stop trying to feed us a line about ICP actually being people who really like science and aren't stupid but are just pretending. Nobody buys it. This is a board for skeptics, and skepticism - we has it. From what I can tell, based on their own words, ICP is "just pretending" to revel in stupidity about as much as Pat Robertson is "just pretending" to be a homophobe. If you've got actual proof otherwise, put up or shut up.

Let's see Pat Robertson=real person
ICP= fictional characters

fallacy. You've compared fictional characters with a real person.

Do you feel Homer Simpson is promoting bad parenting skills and ignorance? Homer Simpson routinely chokes out his child, promotes physical violence as a means of discipline. I mean he's no Bill Cosby, now that's a real dad. :rolleyes:

Yes, this is a skeptics board. You should be comparing ICP with a chupacabra or Nessie, NOT REAL PEOPLE.
 
Still no word yet on how calling scientists "liars" (or clown make-up) proves ICP are pretending to be anti-intellectual.
1) Calling scientists liars is a popular theme of the Beck/Hovind/anti-intellectual crowd.
2) I don't see how being anti-intellectual and wearing clown make-up are mutually exclusive.
3) 3body admitted earlier ICP were sincere in the belief that the song is "deep." Thus, words of people in clown make-up can be serious.

Still no evidence the stupidity is all part of joke ICP created intentionally.

[***Editorial note: 3body first brought up "ICP the band or even just the 2 Joes," seemingly because he can't separate the two.]

Wow, here we go again. Still comparing fictional characters who clearly indicate they are entertainers with real people.

Do you even realize Homer Simpson and Peter Griffin are fictional characters? Are you going to start comparing them to real people too? I hope so, there's no end to the entertainment value of people who can't separate reality from fiction.

"Prove to me Homer Simpson is pretending to be a horrible father" :rolleyes:

"How is Seth Green not promoting ignorance to children by continuing to show people babies and dogs can talk" :rolleyes:
 

Back
Top Bottom