• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why did they "pull" tower seven?

The idea that WTC7 was demolished to destroy sensitive documents is by it's very definition utterly and completely INSANE.

If we're talking about government paperwork, there are very specific rules and regulations regarding the destruction of sensitive documents; trust me, demolishing a building is not among the accepted methods of destruction. Anyone who still spouts this ludicrous claim is off their rocker, batcrap crazy. End of story.
 
made it easy to bring it all down once the holographic projectors were in place.
Click to expand...

How do we know that WTC ever actually existed?????? Sure there are lots of pictures, thousands of eye witnesses and videos of it collapsing.

They are obviously all faked! The building was a hologram projected from the Space DEW weapon. The weapon was needing servicing and they needed a good excuse why the building disappeared! So they dustified the WTC Towers, flew a cruise missile on a "north of Citgo" flightpath over the pentagon, dustified a bit of that too and played a CD hologram of WTC7 falling down!

Its all clear now:D Sorry no "gotcha questions" will be permitted..........
 
Sabrina said:
The idea that WTC7 was demolished to destroy sensitive documents is by it's very definition utterly and completely INSANE.

If we're talking about government paperwork, there are very specific rules and regulations regarding the destruction of sensitive documents; trust me, demolishing a building is not among the accepted methods of destruction. Anyone who still spouts this ludicrous claim is off their rocker, batcrap crazy. End of story.
Click to expand...

Who ordered you to say that? Hmmm?
 
bill smith said:
But why did you delete the Barry Jennings video from my quoted text? ( Readers can find it in my last post above)
Click to expand...

Probably because it was full of "movement" like the last one you linked to.
Do you even watch these before you post? Do you like appearing to be a fool?
 
Sabrina said:
The idea that WTC7 was demolished to destroy sensitive documents is by it's very definition utterly and completely INSANE.

If we're talking about government paperwork, there are very specific rules and regulations regarding the destruction of sensitive documents; trust me, demolishing a building is not among the accepted methods of destruction. Anyone who still spouts this ludicrous claim is off their rocker, batcrap crazy. End of story.
Click to expand...

Well, I don't think the argument is that the "conspirators" were trying to follow established standards in disposing of the supposedly sensitive documents :D.

But yes, I do agree that the argument demonstrates the mental pathology of the advocate. "Off their rocker" is a kind way of putting it; I'd say they're a good 3 or 4 timezones away from their rocker. They didn't just fall off of it,they took a running leap and did a reverse triple gainer off of it! Why in God's name would someone think "I need to dispose of these documents to keep them from becoming public knowledge", then blast them all over Manhattan for anyone, especially the rescue workers, to see and have easy access to. Screw paper shredders; it's as if truthers have never heard of a match or cigarette lighter before.

I mean, there's ludicrous, and then there's absolutely, blightingly ignorant. One of these days, truthers will rise to one of those levels :rolleyes:.
 
Sabrina said:
The idea that WTC7 was demolished to destroy sensitive documents is by it's very definition utterly and completely INSANE.

If we're talking about government paperwork, there are very specific rules and regulations regarding the destruction of sensitive documents; trust me, demolishing a building is not among the accepted methods of destruction. Anyone who still spouts this ludicrous claim is off their rocker, batcrap crazy. End of story.
Click to expand...
Ahh, so they had to demolish the building to get around the red tape! :p

And this connects to the other things happening on that day by ....

Mmm, hang on a minute ....:dio:

.... Nevermind.

Hans
 
ElMondoHummus said:
Well, I don't think the argument is that the "conspirators" were trying to follow established standards in disposing of the supposedly sensitive documents :D.

But yes, I do agree that the argument demonstrates the mental pathology of the advocate. "Off their rocker" is a kind way of putting it; I'd say they're a good 3 or 4 timezones away from their rocker. They didn't just fall off of it,they took a running leap and did a reverse triple gainer off of it! Why in God's name would someone think "I need to dispose of these documents to keep them from becoming public knowledge", then blast them all over Manhattan for anyone, especially the rescue workers, to see and have easy access to. Screw paper shredders; it's as if truthers have never heard of a match or cigarette lighter before.

I mean, there's ludicrous, and then there's absolutely, blightingly ignorant. One of these days, truthers will rise to one of those levels :rolleyes:.
Click to expand...

And I'll be there to shake their hand!
Or shake something.
 
njslim said:
Explosive demolition is banned in Manhattan for just this reason - buildings are
too close and chance of collateral damage is high.
Click to expand...

A while back I offered the truthers a plausible motive for Bldg. 7. I told them they could say that Silverstein knew that it would have to be demolished, and legal demolition of the property could take up to a year. So, he decided to do it illegally and make it look like an accident.

I guess this wasn't diabolical enough, because the truthers didn't bite.
 
dafydd said:
Your whole movement is a cheap joke.Not so much a movement,more like squirming.
Click to expand...

My only movement is what I do in the morning before I go to work, and usually after I've had a cup of coffee.
 
RedIbis said:
My only movement is what I do in the morning before I go to work, and usually after I've had a cup of coffee.
Click to expand...
That figures. :p:rolleyes:

... But, could you be persuaded to dispose of it somewhere else?

Hans
 
Last edited:
sheeplesnshills said:
Probably because it was full of "movement" like the last one you linked to.
Do you even watch these before you post? Do you like appearing to be a fool?
Click to expand...

Are you sure that yu are not projecting a little there Sheeples ? I mean you are a professional Mechanical Engineer and yet you say that these pictures attached represent a natural fire-driven collapse of a massive steel framed structure. No other steel-framed highrise building in the recorded history of the planet Earth has been brought down by fire. In fact the only way one has been cleanly brought down like in the picture is by explosive controlled demolition.

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8607/wtc7controlleddemolitiohq3.jpg WTC7 Before
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/wtc-gallery/wtc-rescuer/wtc7-1.JPG WTC7 seconds later
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Are you sure that yu are not projecting a little there Sheeples ? I mean you are a professional Mechanical Engineer and yet you say that these pictures attached represent a natural fire-driven collapse of a massive steel framed structure. No other steel-framed highrise building in the recorded history of the planet Earth has been brought down by fire. In fact the only way one has been cleanly brought down like in the picture is by explosive controlled demolition.

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8607/wtc7controlleddemolitiohq3.jpg WTC7 Before
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/wtc-gallery/wtc-rescuer/wtc7-1.JPG WTC7 seconds later
Click to expand...

Who ordered you to say that? Hmmm?
 
bill smith said:
No other steel-framed highrise building in the recorded history of the planet Earth has been brought down by fire.
Click to expand...
Astounding logic. :rolleyes:

Because it didn't happen before, it never can? How would anything happen in the first place then? If fire can't bring down a building, what's the point of including fireproofing into the building code?

In fact the only way one has been cleanly brought down like in the picture is by explosive controlled demolition
Click to expand...
Repeating the same unsupported nonsense over and over will never make it true.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Are you sure that yu are not projecting a little there Sheeples ? I mean you are a professional Mechanical Engineer and yet you say that these pictures attached represent a natural fire-driven collapse of a massive steel framed structure. No other steel-framed highrise building in the recorded history of the planet Earth has been brought down by fire. In fact the only way one has been cleanly brought down like in the picture is by explosive controlled demolition.

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8607/wtc7controlleddemolitiohq3.jpg WTC7 Before
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/wtc-gallery/wtc-rescuer/wtc7-1.JPG WTC7 seconds later
Click to expand...

Why do you keep posting pictures from days later as "seconds later"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom