• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Coast to Coast AM Debate, August 21 2010

And you can't be in disagreement?

NO STEEL FRAMED HIGH RISE HAS EVERY COLLAPSED!~!!!
 
Windsor Tower:

Around midnight, on Saturday, February 12, 2005, a fire was detected on the 21st floor. The fire spread quickly throughout the entire building, leading to the collapse of the outermost, steel parts of the upper floors
Click to expand...

Harrit says the concrete collapsed and the steel remained.

:confused:
 
NMSR re Winsdor Tower fire "Concrete stood, steel collapsed" Nutjob "I believe that it was the other way around".

Up is down, left is right, Code Pink is signing their kids up for the Marines, Limbaugh has an "I <3 Obama" button on his lapel. The world has gone mad!!!
 
Harrit: If it has never rained you don't expect rain.

This is completely mentaly illl empiricism.

If Spain never won the World Cup you can not expect them to.

If they do win the World Cup then you are presumably wrong to be right.
 
Dear me....Kim Johnson said that the example he was providing in Madrid Spain was not the Windsor Tower. That sounds like a transparent lie to me.

Still we will allow Dave to explain later how Kim was confused or mistaken or mispoke......
 
Does Gage saying "it came straight down" count as mentioning 'footprint' (because I know that's what he means)...?
 
bill smith said:
Dear me....Kim Johnson said that the example he was providing in Madrid Spain was not the Windsor Tower. That sounds like a transparent lie to me.

Still we will allow Dave to explain later how Kim was confused or mistaken or mispoke......
Click to expand...

Yes, I think he got it wrong.

A factual error but it's not a complete disregard for rationality. Which is a very different kind of error.

EDA: It wasn't a "lie".
 
angrysoba said:
Yes, I think he got it wrong.

A factual error but it's not a complete disregard for rationality. Which is a very different kind of error.

EDA: It wasn't a "lie".
Click to expand...

Yes, he said that he didn't know the name and wanted to confirm with Dave, who wasn't on the phone

BS spinning again!!!
 
Readers this is a burning 8-story skyscraper on 9/11. WTC5. The steel in this builing is far lighter than the steel in the 47-story WTC7. Yet WTC7 collapsed from very small fires- a fact tat you can easily verify online.

WTC5 did not collapse at all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41OCQvu7ULQ WTC5
 
GageBingo2-1.jpg


If anyone's phoning up, get them to bring up the topics that are left! :D ;)
 
"The connections were the strongest part". Wrong. The connections are always the weakest part with only a few exceptions and those exceptions involve some serious quality controls that turn a 10 cent bolt into a $10 bolt. Those type of quality controls are much too expensive for a basic office building and would bankrupt the project from the start.
 
Good question about independent checking of the nanothermite.

This was batted away with, "oh they can check if they like!" by Harrit. This needs much more interrogation. They apparently know of 3 to 10 tons of the stuff that they can get independent verification on.
 
Oh boy. They're going to start taking calls now. I really do hope no planers/pod people/disguised missile people call up.
 
angrysoba said:
Good question about independent checking of the nanothermite.

This was batted away with, "oh they can check if they like!" by Harrit. This needs much more interrogation. They apparently know of 3 to 10 tons of the stuff that they can get independent verification on.
Click to expand...

The 2-yesr 8-scientist study of the nanothermite is already peer-reviewed, passed and published. The boot is on the other foot now. If your guys don't believe it they can have the samples independently tested. We have done our part. It's not like the government have no samples of the dust is it ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom