• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Canadians:Take this guy's money.

Is cmatrix going to return?

He started this thread, continued it in another, and then disappears??

C'mon back, Michael. If "truth" is really your objective, then there is nothing to fear.

Of course, you'll have to rein in your ego a tad. Don't worry. Most of us have been told that on one occasion or another. I certainly know that I have. (And a certain percent of the time, that has been exactly the situation. I can attest that the periodic big ole serving of humility is good for the soul.)

Of course, if the truth is not really your concern, there may be a coupla issues...

So c'mon back.

All's not forgiven yet. But the door's open.


tom
 

Is the increase(sort of) in pay out supposed to be a greater enticement? I wonder how many engineers and physicists live in Vernon? Perhaps its an enticement to have more professional engineers move to Vernon?

Fact remains that Fullerton still has not disclosed that the money is being held in escrow by a disinterested third party (like the Randi prize is). Nor has he stated the measure that will be applied by the , as yet, undisclosed impartial judge(s). Without these he certainly can be assumed to be disingenous in this offer.

I did not really understand the prize split before when it was a greater amount for Canadian citizens. What could the possible reasoning have been? Its even more puzzling now.


......... unless he is actually afraid that someone will offer an ironclad proof and he is attempting to cut his possible losses. There are simply more people in Canada who live outside Vernon B.C., more people in the USA than in Canada. Playing the odds, it would seem more likely that a winner would come from a larger pool and thus he offers less to that larger pool.
 
It is all a granstanding sham meant to woo his followers and fellow cult members as he struggles to become a leader amongst them...nothing more.

TAM:)
 
It does appear that cmatrix has taken a powder...

It appears that he wasn't after the truth after all.

What a (non) surprise.

Therefore, my services are available (at reasonable rates) for anyone who wants to bother taking this guy to the cleaners.


Tom
 
It does appear that cmatrix has taken a powder...

It appears that he wasn't after the truth after all.

What a (non) surprise.

Therefore, my services are available (at reasonable rates) for anyone who wants to bother taking this guy to the cleaners.


Tom
I will never discuss the contest here further so I guess in your minds that means the contest is a sham. If the contest is a sham, then you should have no problem explaining how the laws of physics referenced in the contest are not violated.

Here's my challenge to JREFies. I'll debate the physics behind this contest with anyone anywhere. Just one exception. I want my own thread dealing only with this topic. I tried to start one but it was moved to the general pit of stupidity. I can't discuss it here or it will also be moved. I simply cannot tolerate wading through a gigantic cesspool of electric JREF vomit and e-diarrhea.

:cool:
 
I will never discuss the contest here further so I guess in your minds that means the contest is a sham. If the contest is a sham, then you should have no problem explaining how the laws of physics referenced in the contest are not violated.

Here's my challenge to JREFies. I'll debate the physics behind this contest with anyone anywhere. Just one exception. I want my own thread dealing only with this topic. I tried to start one but it was moved to the general pit of stupidity. I can't discuss it here or it will also be moved. I simply cannot tolerate wading through a gigantic cesspool of electric JREF vomit and e-diarrhea.

:cool:

A thread concerning your contest and your understanding of physics belong in a general pit of stupidity. You're not special. Discuss it here or don't discuss it.

Your contest is a sham because:

1. The money hasn't been shown to even exist.
2. The money isn't held in escrow.
3. You're the arbiter of a winning entry, and since you don't understand physics, there can never be a winner.
 
cmatrix, there's nothing stopping you from starting your own thread. Why whine about it in this one? It's not likely your going to be saving face here, that's a given.
 
I will never discuss the contest here further so I guess in your minds that means the contest is a sham. If the contest is a sham, then you should have no problem explaining how the laws of physics referenced in the contest are not violated.

Here's my challenge to JREFies. I'll debate the physics behind this contest with anyone anywhere. Just one exception. I want my own thread dealing only with this topic. I tried to start one but it was moved to the general pit of stupidity. I can't discuss it here or it will also be moved. I simply cannot tolerate wading through a gigantic cesspool of electric JREF vomit and e-diarrhea.

:cool:
Did you email all the engineering and physics departments? I showed you how easy it was to find all the email addresses. :boggled:

I win, there were no laws of physics broken on 911; Ask any engineer. This is my entry. I win. Send me the money! I win because you can't show that laws of physics were broken on 911. Do you understand why you lost? Hint: evidence... :jaw-dropp

In your own thread, will you include the evidence you don't have?
 
Last edited:
I will never discuss the contest here further so I guess in your minds that means the contest is a sham. If the contest is a sham, then you should have no problem explaining how the laws of physics referenced in the contest are not violated.

Here's my challenge to JREFies. I'll debate the physics behind this contest with anyone anywhere. Just one exception. I want my own thread dealing only with this topic. I tried to start one but it was moved to the general pit of stupidity. I can't discuss it here or it will also be moved. I simply cannot tolerate wading through a gigantic cesspool of electric JREF vomit and e-diarrhea.

:cool:

surprise surprise. Cowardice duly noted. I hope the authorities charge you with fraud. Doubtful it will happen, as you and your "challenge" are hardly worth their time...juvenile attempt to garnish a little silly fame amongst the tiny group of morons who put paranoia and govt hatred above common sense, logic and forensics.

Is that enough JREF vomit and e-diarrhea for you? You represent a small fish in a very small pond of minnows.

TAM:)
 
Oh cripes I live an hour away from Vernon and I have a cottage on a lake there. I'm embarrassed to know there is a truther so close to me
 
Why does his list of applicable Universities have Oxford but not Cambridge, Brunel, Durham or Manchester UMIST?
They are all among the leading Universities.
 
Akso to repeat what someone has already posted
Will you be;
1. placing $10,000 into an escrow account, out of your personal control.
2. publishing a clear & objective set of criteria for successfully meeting your challenge.
3. publishing the competent, objective judges who will determine the success or failure of any given submittal.
 
I will never discuss the contest here further so I guess in your minds that means the contest is a sham. If the contest is a sham, then you should have no problem explaining how the laws of physics referenced in the contest are not violated.

Here's my challenge to JREFies. I'll debate the physics behind this contest with anyone anywhere. Just one exception. I want my own thread dealing only with this topic. I tried to start one but it was moved to the general pit of stupidity. I can't discuss it here or it will also be moved. I simply cannot tolerate wading through a gigantic cesspool of electric JREF vomit and e-diarrhea.

:cool:
Ask the mods to put it as "moderated status" and show us all up. First you have to show how the "laws of physics" were actually violated by the NIST explanation. (not just your interpretation of NIST's explanation).


I'd like to wager you can't.
 
Akso to repeat what someone has already posted
Will you be;
1. placing $10,000 into an escrow account, out of your personal control.
2. publishing a clear & objective set of criteria for successfully meeting your challenge.
3. publishing the competent, objective judges who will determine the success or failure of any given submittal.

the answer to the above would likely be 1.No, 2. No, 3. No, because that would make it a fair legitimate challenge, for which he would be taking a gamble with his own money.

That is not what he wants this challenge to be. This challenge was a paper tiger challenge, set up PURPOSELY so it would look legit but would get no real takers. This would result in allowing him to claim "Victory" and give him 15 minutes of heroism and fame within the truther community.

TAM:)
 
the answer to the above would likely be 1.No, 2. No, 3. No, because that would make it a fair legitimate challenge, for which he would be taking a gamble with his own money.

That is not what he wants this challenge to be. This challenge was a paper tiger challenge, set up PURPOSELY so it would look legit but would get no real takers. This would result in allowing him to claim "Victory" and give him 15 minutes of heroism and fame within the truther community.

TAM:)

It's backfired on him.
 
. I simply cannot tolerate wading through a gigantic cesspool of electric JREF vomit and e-diarrhea.

:cool:

[sarcasm]oooh that so makes me want to engage in a discussion with cmatrix... [/sarcasm]

knowing anything I, or others, put to type will automatically be regarded in the same light as is vomit and feces.
 
I just got back from BC. No 'truth' was to be found. There were lots of zombies though.

Welcome back, you didn't miss too much in this thread:

cmatrix resurfaced, demanded a challenge thread, it wound up in AAH, he had a minor meltdown and was suspended for abusing the report function. We haven't seen him since.

If you hear from him tell him we miss him terribly.
 

Back
Top Bottom