• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Wikileaks founder is "annoyed" by 9/11 conspiracy theories

Read this doozy & read the hilited areas for some laughs:



I highly doubt that Eric Beeth is a "Dr" of anything.

He seems to be a general practioner and nutritionist. He made some noises in Belgium with the H1N1 and even try to prosecute the minister of health.

It doesn't end well. :rolleyes:

BTW, he is a truther (O rly?) :D
 
So has the spectre been raised of Wikileaks actually being in cahoots with the Americans ?

I guess it's possible. After all the leaks that the government itself lets drop are highly suspect. What better than to have an apparent enemy leaking instead on your secret behalf. The credibility factor is so much higher.

Except that all seems to have been dumped in favour of the short-term gain of heavily implicating Pakistan in anti-American activity. Action must be nigh.

Poor Julian may have been left out in the cold.

Or I could be completely wrong and wikileaks is the real McCoy.

having it both ways so you can never be wrong is so intellecually dishonest it's not funny
 
Wikileaks has built up a certain amount of credibility (IMO) and protecting that credibility may be pretty important to Mr. Assange. If he were to allow things to be posted on his site that were factually deficient or unfounded falsehoods, he'd lose that credibility (which I think may be that his site is a reliable source even if there is a question in the interpretation and conclusions that may be reached).

For instance, if the apparently doctored video alleging the sounds of explosions were submitted as proof of a 9/11 CD, he would subject it to everything many here have subjected it to (analysis of the video and consideration or more likely verification of the source/provenance) because it will matter to the credibility of the Wikileaks site.

In this arena, the CTers have encountered someone who actually stands to lose something (credibility and reputation) he values (and perhaps worked hard to get) so he's going to be skeptical until proven otherwise. As he said (or something to the effect), there are more than enough provable conspiracies in the world.

For most, if not all, of the known 9/11 CT sites, they're under no such burden.

I suppose the inhabitants of those sites probably disagree about that last.
:)
 
So has the spectre been raised of Wikileaks actually being in cahoots with the Americans ?

I guess it's possible. After all the leaks that the government itself lets drop are highly suspect. What better than to have an apparent enemy leaking instead on your secret behalf. The credibility factor is so much higher.

Except that all seems to have been dumped in favour of the short-term gain of heavily implicating Pakistan in anti-American activity. Action must be nigh.

Poor Julian may have been left out in the cold.

Or I could be completely wrong and wikileaks is the real McCoy.

You're a hypocrite CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP You're a hypocrite.
 
Wonderful new Avatar UC...awesome.

TAM:)

Damn, he copied my idea!

I also did an animated version but I thought it was too distracting.
Fizzgig-protest.gif
 
Last edited:
It does seem a bit of a cult like organization with not a lot of content.

Having the Afghan War Diary might be a useful source for historians that might not normally become available or not for 50 years or so. However having read a number of war diaries for divisions and police regiments of the German armed forces and police, it really doesnt seem qualitatively different. The only "revelation" is during war, soldiers operating in a foreign context will occasionally shot at shadows and kill civilians.

For the record, entries like "fishing rod on back looked like gun" don't seem very convincing to me. I have knocked around iran, pakistan and number of countries in the region and the only place I have seen people fishing with traditional angling rods is the Golden Horn in Istanbul. Fly fishing is a sadly neglected sport in the Hindu Kush - but the other thing reading german war diaries teaches me is that atrocities are seldom explicitly written down.

There is apparently a large encrypted file "straw bottle glass" on wikileaks which no one can read, called "insurance". Again, great showmanship, but will it lead to anything? Its hard to see a private like Pfc Manning having access to such a wide array of classified material, so perhaps Wikileaks consciously or unconsciously is being played. And again, the classified material is nothing more than a war diary - wars come and go but the Illuminati stay with us.

Sadly at the moment the only way the Illuminati might get exposed would be if the very security state they have helped create turns on it, in some kind of blow-back. I don't think that they leave much paper records other than their communications with each other.
 
Last edited:
The Illuminati lol.Read a lot of comic books,little grey rabbi?

Indeed, I am very fond of Maus, for example.

Actually I just use the term Illuminati as a placeholder.

If you prefer I could use "The Family - Unseen, Unknown, and Unheard" or how about "Running dogs of the Judeo-Bolshevist-Masonic Plutocracy"

?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom