• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

AE911Truth, physicists to debate Coast to coast

If you spoke to demolition EXPERTS (as have I) around the g--d---n world, you'd know it is not such an impossible task, particularly given that Marvin was in charge of "security" at the WTC (untill the day of 9/11!!!) and that the Bin Laden's were were given the job of reconstruction after the FIRST WTC bombing in '93.

But oh, we don't want to talk about how Bush Sr. was meeting with the Bin Laden's the day OF the first WTC bombing, do we?

Add to that the mysterious power downs during the weeks before 9/11 and the most "extensive elevator renovation" in history.... and the witnesses who saw "maintenence" men going in and out of the WTC during these "power downs" and the...

Oh, what's the use... You're not interested in truth are you?

Talk to an expert. It won't hurt. Well, a little. Truth sometimes hurts.

I'm on your side with this one brother joey. 911 Truth is sweeping America. It's the issue that's dividing America, dividing families, friends, colleagues. It's the issue that dominates elections platforms at every level in our great nation. Just watch those videos of John McCain at townhall election meetings - everywhere he went, it was voters calling for the truth about 911. Thousands march in the streets demanding justice. Firefighters and police march side-by-side with demolitions experts, scientists, and construction engineers. Textbooks have been rewitten. The entire engineering industry and the training of engineers has been completely reshaped by the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center buildings.

911 Truth is simply the most important social issue of our life time. Tell me more, man. Shake us up some more with some of that 911 Truth Syrup.
 
If you spoke to demolition EXPERTS (as have I) around the g--d---n world, you'd know it is not such an impossible task, particularly given that Marvin was in charge of "security" at the WTC (untill the day of 9/11!!!)

Talk to an expert.

Hehe. So good ole Marvin was 'in charge' was he? That would be very difficult for him since he was never head of security anyway, he was a board member of Securacom, and he left that firm in 2000.

I agree, you should talk to experts - that is, an 'expert' in the literal sense - someone who knows what they're talking about.
Whomever you've been consulting is no expert, I'm afraid, since the info you just provided is false.

Don't even start with the bomb-sniffing dogs, you won't fool anyone here with these tired old myths. They were dead in 2006, now they're Zombie Doctrines, doomed to wander the minds of 9/11 truthers; not alive and not quite dead.
 
Please keep on-topic. This thread is about the upcoming debate. There are plenty of other threads to discuss specific 9/11 issues. Thanks.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Gaspode
 
So another possible debating point that Dave may have to deal with might be whether the top one-tenth of a structure can crush the lower and more strongly built nine-tenths of the same structure down flat on the ground by gravity alone ?

He might for instance be asked for any example. large or small in the entire recorded history of the planet Earth of this happening. Would it not be highly embarrassing- not to say compromising not to be able to come up with a single example as debunkers typically can not. He might dissemble, but the listeners will see right through that and draw their own conclusions.

I am not trying to start a discussion on this subject but it IS a point for Dave to consider. There are many more such gems.
 
Last edited:
So another possible debating point that Dave may have to deal with might be whether the top one-tenth of a structure can crush the lower and more strongly built nine-tenths of the same structure down flat on the ground by gravity alone ?

.

No Bill, For people that actually do understand physics this is a "no brainier".
 
No Bill, For people that actually do understand physics this is a "no brainier".
Well then you better hope that the audience understands physics in the 9/11 debunker way. Otherwise this and other questions like it could eviscerate your guys.
 
Well then you better hope that the audience understands physics in the 9/11 debunker way. Otherwise this and other questions like it could eviscerate your guys.
The problem (for you) is the "convincing argument" only works for the short term. At some point the "science" will always win the argument. Always has, always will.

GOT SCIENCE?
 
The problem (for you) is the "convincing argument" only works for the short term. At some point the "science" will always win the argument. Always has, always will.

GOT SCIENCE?
Sure.

A four-hour show isn't it ? Pretty short term really. And yet another point for Dave to bear in mind is that you don't get a second chance to make a first impression.
 
Last edited:
He might for instance be asked for any example. large or small in the entire recorded history of the planet Earth of this happening.

The answer to this canard is easy. Any one ever land on the moon before Neil & crew?
Nope, yet it still happened! Unless you're a Moon hoaxer maroon, are you BS?
There are many firsts through out recorded history, only a fool believes otherwise! BS?
 
And yet another point for Dave to bear in mind is that you don't get a second chance to make a first impression.

Why don't you just threaten to kick his dog while you're at it?

Freakin' scare tactics...usually reserved to those who fear their opposition. Sad.
 
The answer to this canard is easy. Any one ever land on the moon before Neil & crew?
Nope, yet it still happened! Unless you're a Moon hoaxer maroon, are you BS?
There are many firsts through out recorded history, only a fool believes otherwise! BS?

I would advise Dave against taking that line. The '9/11 being a day of firsts thing'. It just sounds- ridiculous.
 
Sure.

A four-hour show isn't it ? Pretty short term really. And yet another point for Dave to bear in mind is that you don't get a second chance to make a first impression.
It doesn't matter one little bit (sorry Dave). If he tanks completely eventually you (truthers) are going to have to put up hard facts (that you don't have).

Do you understand the paradox?
 
It doesn't matter one little bit (sorry Dave). If he tanks completely eventually you (truthers) are going to have to put up hard facts (that you don't have).

Do you understand the paradox?

If they 'tank' as you say it will just convert anything up to a few million more individuals to the Truth side. It's inevitable anyway. I fear that the jref 9/11 subforum might be an indirect casualty though and be shut down .
 
Last edited:
if they 'tank' as you say it will just convert anything up to a few million more individuals to the truth side. It's inevitable anyway. I fear that the jref 9/11 subforum might be a casualty though and be shut down .

you are certifiably crazy my man.
 

Back
Top Bottom