Ed All 43 videos "Second Hit"" [Explosion]at WTC 2: Plane or No Plane?

Status
Not open for further replies.
:bunpan

"6 people saw an airplane hit the tower, therefore no airplanes hit the tower" -Jammonius
 
Last edited:
Jammy;
I am really getting concerned. Several times I have asked if you have gotten your tickets yet, and you have provided no answer. I have even offered to help if i can. However, if you indeed are on a no-fly list, there is not much I can do. If you are not going to come over and visit, please let us know so we can cancel our plans we made for you.

I told you to send me the date, time and place info in a PM. You didn't do that. Would you please get your act together. :p
 
facepalm.jpg


That is all.

/Thread
 
:bunpan

"6 people saw an airplane hit the tower, therefore no airplanes hit the tower" -Jammonius
Not just that, using his own logic he now has 0 "no plane witnesses" and still thinks its evidence of of no planes hitting the tower.
 
Originally Posted by fess
Jammy;
I am really getting concerned. Several times I have asked if you have gotten your tickets yet, and you have provided no answer. I have even offered to help if i can. However, if you indeed are on a no-fly list, there is not much I can do. If you are not going to come over and visit, please let us know so we can cancel our plans we made for you.
I told you to send me the date, time and place info in a PM. You didn't do that. Would you please get your act together.

That’s not exactly what you said, so if I use your process of comprehension, that message isn’t real, and should be discounted entirely.
As for the time and place, I work for myself and I am quite flexible with my time. All you have to do is let me know what time you plan to arrive, and I’ll be there, no PM’s necessary.
 
That’s not exactly what you said, so if I use your process of comprehension, that message isn’t real, and should be discounted entirely.
As for the time and place, I work for myself and I am quite flexible with my time. All you have to do is let me know what time you plan to arrive, and I’ll be there, no PM’s necessary.

Wait, let's try to be clearer if we can. You're talking about meeting at Engine 6 in NYC, right? If I recall, it's on Beekman Street, somewhere near the City Hall?

I may need to be in NYC sometime within the next few weeks. So, we may be able to make some progress over the course of, say, the next 10 posts or so on this issue. Who knows?

Post up :D
 
Wait, let's try to be clearer if we can. You're talking about meeting at Engine 6 in NYC, right? If I recall, it's on Beekman Street, somewhere near the City Hall?

I may need to be in NYC sometime within the next few weeks. So, we may be able to make some progress over the course of, say, the next 10 posts or so on this issue. Who knows?

Post up :D

Great! Than you can tell the firefighters that the FDNY is one of the culprits of 9/11. I'll bet they love that!
 
Great! Than you can tell the firefighters that the FDNY is one of the culprits of 9/11. I'll bet they love that!

Please film it for us! I hope that Jammy has full medical insurance,for his sake.
 
What happened to the planes that took off if they didn't crash? Where did they go?
 
What happened to the planes that took off if they didn't crash? Where did they go?

They all were buried in the city of Atlantis

The people were offloaded and are now being forced to work for the IRS, NBC, Macy's, and the Travelling Antiques Road Show.

Jeez, don't you already know this? It's all over youtube!
 
The above is a hopeless hodge-podge of assumption-riddled, misplacement and misattribution of fact, of logic, of reasoning, to name some misses.

To begin with, the proposition that is opposite that which you propose is equally valid; namely: If one video is fake, then it calls into question the entire event. More than one video is obviously a fake from among the ALL 43; but, equally important, none of them show a jetliner in a realistic crash into a steel reinforced building: Not one.

so you insist all are faked? Remember even if only one is real then a plane hit the building.
What do you think a "realistic" crash would look like? and what do you base that on? how many airliners have you seen crash into steel buildings?

Accordingly, there is nothing about the videos of the explosions at the WTC that gives rise to a reasonable assertion that a jetliner was involved.

That is merely your opinion not fact. Since it is clear you never actually been close to an airliner, travelled in one or even been to a large city, why should we think your opinion is of any worth at all? :confused:
 
"United Airlines has now confirmed that two of its aircraft have crashed." That language, standing alone, is vague. Here's why:

1--The language begs the question that it does not answer; namely: How and in what manner did it get into a position to confirm that two of its aircraft crashed?

At the very least by not being able to contact either of its planes, they did not arrive where they were supposed to and they were told by FAA that their places had turned off their transducers, tracked on radar to spots where there were very large explosions. maybe they were lied to but why would UA suspect that so they would make short press release as reported.
Do you have any evidence they were lied to?

2--Did the FBI tell United to say that?

Why would FBI tell them to say anything? Do you have proof that FBI told them to make that specific press release....don't you think UA would think it very strange that FBI was telling them to do so?

3--Was the statement a part of the, you guessed it: "EXERCISE"?

How could it be? UA was not part of any exercise and what Airline is going tolie about aircrashs????? Not really good for the business :rolleyes:

4--Which two aircraft?

The two they couldn't contact?????

5--There is a disconnect between that statement and the next part, which merely says that Flight 93 and 175 took off. It doesn't actually say those are the aircraft that crashed, does it? I will here hasten to add that I know you want to believe the two are connected; and, goodness knows you assume the two statements are connected. But, then again, it is necessary for you to do that in order to hold onto the common storyline of 9/11, isn't it?

The remainder of the statement actually says next to nothing at all about Flight 175, does it?

No disconnect, two planes took off, two planes missing, two planes crashed. Only a moron would suggest they were anything but the same planes! They had only two planes missing!:boggled:
 
See post # 3145. Look, I am not seeking to be dogmatic here. If you want to discuss this, fine. I'm willing. I'm merely calling attention to the actual wording.

I think that statement is utterly vague.


So we add lack of comprehension of simple English to your weaknesses. The wording is crystal clear....what part don't you understand?
 
Please film it for us! I hope that Jammy has full medical insurance,for his sake.

I second this.

If this actually takes place (I know it won't, but I can dream) and it is filmed the utter thrashing that jam takes could be the next great youtube video internet meme. Forget Star Wars Kid, Double Rainbow Guy, Because I Back-traced It Guy or anybody else. This could be THE video. The one that is so great it causes a rift in the space time continuum.
 
I second this.

If this actually takes place (I know it won't, but I can dream) and it is filmed the utter thrashing that jam takes could be the next great youtube video internet meme. Forget Star Wars Kid, Double Rainbow Guy, Because I Back-traced It Guy or anybody else. This could be THE video. The one that is so great it causes a rift in the space time continuum.

Even Epic Bearded Man?


 
Wait, let's try to be clearer if we can. You're talking about meeting at Engine 6 in NYC, right? If I recall, it's on Beekman Street, somewhere near the City Hall?
I can't get much more clearer than; "As for the time and place, I work for myself and I am quite flexible with my time. All you have to do is let me know what time you plan to arrive, and I’ll be there, no PM’s necessary." And yes, I gave you the exact address.

I may need to be in NYC sometime within the next few weeks. So, we may be able to make some progress over the course of, say, the next 10 posts or so on this issue. Who knows?

Post up :D
I would suggest you leave your arrogance at home.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom