The most interesting thing about the NPT is that, since you cannot prove a negative, it's proof lay only in it's ability to explain the collection of 9-11 events, better than any other theory. It's tricky business, made even trickier, because all it would take to disprove it entirely, is hard evidence that planes actually hit the towers.
I came up with the NPT quite a while back. I began to consider it as a possibility, not because of the videos of the aircraft, as much as because of the behavior of the so called skyjackers, their exhibited lack of skills and training, and finally because their ranks had been thinned by the discovery that nine of them were still alive, had nothing to do with 9-11, and one of them has died a year before 9-11-2001. So, with 4 planes to populate and only 9 skyjackers to do it, something seemed very wrong indeed with the official story. Rather than bother to guess which skyjackers were on which planes, I decided to take the "quick n dirty" route and simply read the transcripts of the calls from the planes. Sure enough, the entire remaining 9 skyjackers can be accounted for between the two WTC jets.
So, if we assume that no one is lying on these planes, then we have two other planes with no skyjackers on board, but yet they've strayed from their flight plan. Well, that simply doesn't make any sense at all, since we can't assume that the flight crew took over the planes and engaged a suicide mission. Yet, here we have a fatal conflict; either the "calls from the planes" are fake or American flight crews took over and engaged these attacks themselves. Obviously this forces the conclusion that the calls are fakes.
So now we must move to examine the rationale for mounting the extreme difficulties involved in providing faked calls from the aircraft. The only logical answer is: To buttress the illusion of planes being involved!
Hold on just a minute, before you question how I came to that conclusion! Examine the situation and the extreme gravity of it! Here you are plotting a major terrorist attack, that will be shown on worldwide media. To avoid getting caught, and to successfully blame the intended parties, you must avoid making any gross mistakes that cannot be corrected by a propaganda machine.
Now, let's try to get a handle on the resources of these planners. For that we take a look at the rather chintzy resources made available to the fall guys, Mohammad Atta and friends. They like to drink, they like to gamble and they like stripper bars and clubs. But rather than being the free spending patsies you'd expect them to be, they're going to cheap joints and eating pizza. These planners own no jets and their plans at various points exhibit the artifacts of a cash strapped/low budget operation. Paltry funds wired to the skyjackers, are unspent and returned. Of course, it goes without saying that these guys do not exhibit the devoted mien of the Islamic fundamentalist they're supposed to be. So this is not an operation with an unlimited budget. You don't give funds to men you expect to commit a suicide mission, then ask for those funds back, most especially if they know they're to commit suicide. While on the other hand, if they don't know that, then you have no guarantee of their performance. Triple that for gambling, womanizing lushes.
Okay, so now we're ready to examine the conditions surrounding the nature of the plans. Do we use planes or not? No, it doesn't make sense! We don't have the pilots to fly them, first off, and secondly: what if they miss?
Here some will suggest that some sort of remote technology might be employed! Well, there's a few things that mitigate against it. Not the least of which is the incredible 510 knot speed of flight 11 and the 400 knot speed of flight 175. Both of these speeds are beyond the design capacity of these aircraft, which simply means, neither of these aircraft could function as they should during these times when design specs are exceeded. The wings flutter, the control surfaces lose their "laminar air flow", they stall, and generally there is no control of the aircraft possible. Yet, the video shows, that while these craft have no operating control surfaces, they engage quite precision maneuvers. Maneuvers that should be impossible at those speeds, even for a robotic device.
Now let's have a look at the options:
Obtain 4 aircraft and prep them with remote capabilities?
Too much could go wrong, all the way from chance discovery, to sub
spec equipment, timeline/delivery failure. Real passengers and pilots would be too unpredictable, if left alive they might somehow thwart your control of the craft, meaning it misses the target and leaves you exposed to devastating discovery.
Another thing is that these real planes would be "seen" by NORAD, CENTCOM and a whole host of other radar tracking stations that litter the northeast. It's hard to predict how any "stand down" order will actually perform with so many stations looking on JFK and NWK for example.
But then there's a much more serious impediment to the actual use of planes. To kill the passengers, to ensure success, all you need to do is depressurize the aircraft at or above 30,000 ft. But, if you do that, you must be absolutely certain that the evidence of that is destroyed completely. No only does a crash into the towers not do that, but worse yet is the fact that the greater NY airspace is literally crawling with private aircraft and helicopter etc., any one of which can collide with your wayward jet and leave a rather terrible evidence trail behind.
So, for an operation that requires 100% guarantee that aircraft appear to strike the two towers, with absolute certainty, only by not using planes and by substituting illusion can this effect be securely achieved.
Now this would explain, for an event where planes were actually supposed to have been flown into the towers, why would anyone allow fake video appear on the air? You have real video of a real event, why call it into question by releasing fake video? For that matter, why even bother with "calls from the planes" which only provide another avenue of challenge?
The answer of course is, because there was no other way to create the desired impression. If there were planes no fake anything would have been needed. Video of passengers boarding the planes, and video of them crashing into the towers would have sufficed. But, only if there were no planes, would fake and false evidence be required or allowed, because it was needed.
Imagine if neither plane hit either tower! Do you think they could simply take them down and go on with the show? How? If the planes don't hit they've lost their Islamic fundie skyjackers, if the towers come down then, someone else has to be the blame. The old "van full of explosives in the basement garage" just won't do it this time around.
So, if this is true and no planes were used, then all of the videos have to be fake. Since we already know that the calls from the planes were fake, we have a very good bet going that all of the videos will be fake as well. Like I said, you don't fake things when you have the real McCoy in hand.
Inversely, when you don't have anything real to show, then all you have is fake.
I'll be waiting to see those real videos of the real planes. I can't see them being forth coming because, all the ones they showed the public on 9-11 tv were fakes. Yes, and I know that there were "eyewitnesses" who say they saw what the cameras couldn't film. Which would you believe?
I came up with the NPT quite a while back. I began to consider it as a possibility, not because of the videos of the aircraft, as much as because of the behavior of the so called skyjackers, their exhibited lack of skills and training, and finally because their ranks had been thinned by the discovery that nine of them were still alive, had nothing to do with 9-11, and one of them has died a year before 9-11-2001. So, with 4 planes to populate and only 9 skyjackers to do it, something seemed very wrong indeed with the official story. Rather than bother to guess which skyjackers were on which planes, I decided to take the "quick n dirty" route and simply read the transcripts of the calls from the planes. Sure enough, the entire remaining 9 skyjackers can be accounted for between the two WTC jets.
So, if we assume that no one is lying on these planes, then we have two other planes with no skyjackers on board, but yet they've strayed from their flight plan. Well, that simply doesn't make any sense at all, since we can't assume that the flight crew took over the planes and engaged a suicide mission. Yet, here we have a fatal conflict; either the "calls from the planes" are fake or American flight crews took over and engaged these attacks themselves. Obviously this forces the conclusion that the calls are fakes.
So now we must move to examine the rationale for mounting the extreme difficulties involved in providing faked calls from the aircraft. The only logical answer is: To buttress the illusion of planes being involved!
Hold on just a minute, before you question how I came to that conclusion! Examine the situation and the extreme gravity of it! Here you are plotting a major terrorist attack, that will be shown on worldwide media. To avoid getting caught, and to successfully blame the intended parties, you must avoid making any gross mistakes that cannot be corrected by a propaganda machine.
Now, let's try to get a handle on the resources of these planners. For that we take a look at the rather chintzy resources made available to the fall guys, Mohammad Atta and friends. They like to drink, they like to gamble and they like stripper bars and clubs. But rather than being the free spending patsies you'd expect them to be, they're going to cheap joints and eating pizza. These planners own no jets and their plans at various points exhibit the artifacts of a cash strapped/low budget operation. Paltry funds wired to the skyjackers, are unspent and returned. Of course, it goes without saying that these guys do not exhibit the devoted mien of the Islamic fundamentalist they're supposed to be. So this is not an operation with an unlimited budget. You don't give funds to men you expect to commit a suicide mission, then ask for those funds back, most especially if they know they're to commit suicide. While on the other hand, if they don't know that, then you have no guarantee of their performance. Triple that for gambling, womanizing lushes.
Okay, so now we're ready to examine the conditions surrounding the nature of the plans. Do we use planes or not? No, it doesn't make sense! We don't have the pilots to fly them, first off, and secondly: what if they miss?
Here some will suggest that some sort of remote technology might be employed! Well, there's a few things that mitigate against it. Not the least of which is the incredible 510 knot speed of flight 11 and the 400 knot speed of flight 175. Both of these speeds are beyond the design capacity of these aircraft, which simply means, neither of these aircraft could function as they should during these times when design specs are exceeded. The wings flutter, the control surfaces lose their "laminar air flow", they stall, and generally there is no control of the aircraft possible. Yet, the video shows, that while these craft have no operating control surfaces, they engage quite precision maneuvers. Maneuvers that should be impossible at those speeds, even for a robotic device.
Now let's have a look at the options:
Obtain 4 aircraft and prep them with remote capabilities?
Too much could go wrong, all the way from chance discovery, to sub
spec equipment, timeline/delivery failure. Real passengers and pilots would be too unpredictable, if left alive they might somehow thwart your control of the craft, meaning it misses the target and leaves you exposed to devastating discovery.
Another thing is that these real planes would be "seen" by NORAD, CENTCOM and a whole host of other radar tracking stations that litter the northeast. It's hard to predict how any "stand down" order will actually perform with so many stations looking on JFK and NWK for example.
But then there's a much more serious impediment to the actual use of planes. To kill the passengers, to ensure success, all you need to do is depressurize the aircraft at or above 30,000 ft. But, if you do that, you must be absolutely certain that the evidence of that is destroyed completely. No only does a crash into the towers not do that, but worse yet is the fact that the greater NY airspace is literally crawling with private aircraft and helicopter etc., any one of which can collide with your wayward jet and leave a rather terrible evidence trail behind.
So, for an operation that requires 100% guarantee that aircraft appear to strike the two towers, with absolute certainty, only by not using planes and by substituting illusion can this effect be securely achieved.
Now this would explain, for an event where planes were actually supposed to have been flown into the towers, why would anyone allow fake video appear on the air? You have real video of a real event, why call it into question by releasing fake video? For that matter, why even bother with "calls from the planes" which only provide another avenue of challenge?
The answer of course is, because there was no other way to create the desired impression. If there were planes no fake anything would have been needed. Video of passengers boarding the planes, and video of them crashing into the towers would have sufficed. But, only if there were no planes, would fake and false evidence be required or allowed, because it was needed.
Imagine if neither plane hit either tower! Do you think they could simply take them down and go on with the show? How? If the planes don't hit they've lost their Islamic fundie skyjackers, if the towers come down then, someone else has to be the blame. The old "van full of explosives in the basement garage" just won't do it this time around.
So, if this is true and no planes were used, then all of the videos have to be fake. Since we already know that the calls from the planes were fake, we have a very good bet going that all of the videos will be fake as well. Like I said, you don't fake things when you have the real McCoy in hand.
Inversely, when you don't have anything real to show, then all you have is fake.
I'll be waiting to see those real videos of the real planes. I can't see them being forth coming because, all the ones they showed the public on 9-11 tv were fakes. Yes, and I know that there were "eyewitnesses" who say they saw what the cameras couldn't film. Which would you believe?
