Ed All 43 videos "Second Hit"" [Explosion]at WTC 2: Plane or No Plane?

Status
Not open for further replies.
jammonius said:
Uke2se

Assuming your request for "help" is legitimate, despite 9/11 world being one where "denial" is predominant, I will here try to help you understand.


Let's do it with a picture because, as you know, they are worth 1000words:

[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/flightsimvideo/flight175-pg76.jpg?t=1281014156[/qimg]

That picture tells us that there are 3 persons pictured and one stone image pictured whereby, because of age, the persons and the stone image probably could not have done a darn thing to thwart a supposed hijacking.

As "help" is not the same as spoon-feeding, I will here pause and ask that you confirm that you are comfortable in a) deducing who the three people and the one stone image are; and b) that it is proper to infer that because of age they probably could not have been expected to thwart a hijacking.

After you post on the foregoing, I will revert with more help and more discussion. As well, I will likely add to the picture/age correlation collection based on Compus' anticipated posting.
Click to expand...

Dear readers and lurkers,

I sense you too are wondering what the hell does it matter that the average age of the people on board UA175 was 37? What matters is that five religious fanatic murderous terrorists hijacked a plane, flew it into WTC2 and killed everybody on board. EVERYBODY. Subsequently, they directly killed dozens of people in the tower when they crashed the plane into it, and indirectly killed hundreds more when the tower collapsed.
 
jammonius said:
Let me double check for accuracy: You are asking the above in a rhetorical fashion where you're really trying to say something other than the literal content, right? If so, what are you trying to say, please?

Surely, you grasp that there are any number of possibilities here, including that they are actual people who actually died. That is possible. However, where and how they died, if they did, has not ever been determined.

It is also possible the persons could be fictitious. Consider for instance, that one of them is, in fact, only represented by a stone image likeness, not even a photo of the person.

That, in and of itself, is vastly rich. It confirms that it simply doesn't take much to convince some of the truth of the common storyline of 9/11. A stone image will suffice to confirm the identity of a human being.

The foregoing is, in part, symbolic; and, in part forensic. There may actually be photographs of the 69 year old alleged passenger. The point, however, is that no such depiction was posted by Compus. Thus, posters here are required to infer a person from a stone image of one. I assume you'll allow as how what is said here is true, right?



Surely you jest. A seating chart is just that: A freakin' chart that could be made up by anyone for any purpose. That, in fact, is the whole point as to my having carefully explained, more than once, that there exists NO authenticated passenger manifest for either this or any other 9/11 flight. There exist made-up charts; but, there does not exist any publicly available, authenticated passenger manifests.



If you are like most, you are not in a position to discuss the above in detail; however, please feel free to provide any additional information that you are comfortable in posting, if there is any.
Click to expand...

The only comment I have for this vile post is there is only one possibility and that is the passengers and crew were murdered when their airplane was deliberately flown into 2 WTC. Thousands saw it with their own eyes. Millions more saw it on television.

You are wrong, jammonius. WRONG.
 
Last edited:
tsig said:
What word salad? Some saw a leafy thingy but no one saw dressing so the salad doesn't exist.
Click to expand...

You have no proof that thousands saw tomato wedges crash into the bowl.

ETA: Only 5 witnesses did. Therefore, this word salad contains no tomatos.
 
Last edited:
Bell said:
Dear readers and lurkers,

I sense you too are wondering what the hell does it matter that the average age of the people on board UA175 was 37?
Click to expand...

Information matters, Bell. After all, information, the sum and the substance of what little we can actually be said to know about the events of 9/11/01 is necessary to consider. One would not have thought that posting up information would result in the kind of post you have made here. :boggled:

Seemingly, at least, and subject to clarification by you, it seems you are being dismissive of information. Look, Compus is the one posting up the testimonials about alleged passengers of alleged Flight 175.

Surely you'll acknowledge the information has some forensic value, separate and apart from the propaganda purpose Compus is using it for. If one posts up information, that information is fair game for consideration right? Give me a break here, Bell, I'm only putting to some use the propaganda ploy Compus is subjecting us too. sheesh.

What matters is that five religious fanatic murderous terrorists hijacked a plane,
Click to expand...

Earth to Bell, can you state whom you have in mind as and for the party(ies) you are trying to convince with your quoted flourish of propaganda embellishment? Is it yourself you are trying to convince, others, one the other, both,what?

... flew it into WTC2 and killed everybody on board. EVERYBODY. Subsequently, they directly killed dozens of people in the tower when they crashed the plane into it, and indirectly killed hundreds more when the tower collapsed.
Click to expand...

That is as good a rendition of the common storyline of 9/11 as any. Problem is, the tale is not supported by rational evidence, let alone a properly determined investigatory finding.

It is a story, a psyop, a shock&awe episode of historic dimension and proportion. That is how it shapes up analytically. What you described is how it shapes up emotionally.
all the best
 
I'm left wondering how J can conclude that anything at all happens. He never did answer how he was able to say that I was born...
 
jammonius said:
Information matters, Bell. After all, information, the sum and the substance of what little we can actually be said to know about the events of 9/11/01 is necessary to consider. One would not have thought that posting up information would result in the kind of post you have made here. :boggled:

Seemingly, at least, and subject to clarification by you, it seems you are being dismissive of information. Look, Compus is the one posting up the testimonials about alleged passengers of alleged Flight 175.

Surely you'll acknowledge the information has some forensic value, separate and apart from the propaganda purpose Compus is using it for. If one posts up information, that information is fair game for consideration right? Give me a break here, Bell, I'm only putting to some use the propaganda ploy Compus is subjecting us too. sheesh.



Earth to Bell, can you state whom you have in mind as and for the party(ies) you are trying to convince with your quoted flourish of propaganda embellishment? Is it yourself you are trying to convince, others, one the other, both,what?



That is as good a rendition of the common storyline of 9/11 as any. Problem is, the tale is not supported by rational evidence, let alone a properly determined investigatory finding.

It is a story, a psyop, a shock&awe episode of historic dimension and proportion. That is how it shapes up analytically. What you described is how it shapes up emotionally.
all the best
Click to expand...



Hey, it's YouTube so it must be true.
 
Last edited:
jammonius said:
determined.

It is also possible the persons could be fictitious. Consider for instance, that one of them is, in fact, only represented by a stone image likeness, not even a photo of the person..
Click to expand...



Tell that to the families that are still in mourning for their murdered loved ones. You are disgusting.
 
jammonius said:
However, where and how they died, if they did, has not ever been determined.

.
Click to expand...

They were murdered on 9/11, when hijackers deliberatly crashed their planes.
Only in your warped world view could you be blind to this reality.
You show a complete indifference to those who were killed, and are a shameless apologist for the terrorist murderers. You should be ashamed of yourself.
 
Last edited:
Jammonious,

There are no photos or youtube videos of the following people, do you doubt their existence as well?

Galileo
Socrates
Plato
Sir Francis Drake
Alexander the Great
Leonardo DaVinci
Dinosaurs

I doubt you will respond.
 
There are no photographs of myself taken after 1979, doesn't mean I disappeared then.

What happened to the aircraft if they didn't crash?
 
Captain_Swoop said:
There are no photographs of myself taken after 1979, doesn't mean I disappeared then.

What happened to the aircraft if they didn't crash?
Click to expand...
You only think so! [cue ominous music]

<looks at NWO file #dshm5990fd from 1980 company picnic and giggles>


BTW: Did you ever call her back? :boxedin:



:D
 
Last edited:
jammonius said:
Uke2se

Assuming your request for "help" is legitimate, despite 9/11 world being one where "denial" is predominant, I will here try to help you understand.


Let's do it with a picture because, as you know, they are worth 1000words:

[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/flightsimvideo/flight175-pg76.jpg?t=1281014156[/qimg]

That picture tells us that there are 3 persons pictured and one stone image pictured whereby, because of age, the persons and the stone image probably could not have done a darn thing to thwart a supposed hijacking.

As "help" is not the same as spoon-feeding, I will here pause and ask that you confirm that you are comfortable in a) deducing who the three people and the one stone image are; and b) that it is proper to infer that because of age they probably could not have been expected to thwart a hijacking.

After you post on the foregoing, I will revert with more help and more discussion. As well, I will likely add to the picture/age correlation collection based on Compus' anticipated posting.
Click to expand...

Why an idiotic post-What are you suggesting? Just more Truther rambling. Do you think the people pictured did not exist?
Try again Rainman.
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
You only think so! [cue ominous music]

<looks at NWO file #dshm5990fd from 1980 company picnic and giggles>


BTW: Did you ever call her back? :boxedin:



:D
Click to expand...

Old people :rolleyes:

In 1980 I was still in NWO elementary school, learning numerology, anagrams, backmasking, apophenia and bomb making.
 
jammonius said:
However, where and how they died, if they did, has not ever been determined.
Click to expand...

So, how about the fact that their bones and DNA ended up at the WTC site? How'd that happen there Jamm?
 
jammonius said:
Surely you jest. A seating chart is just that: A freakin' chart that could be made up by anyone for any purpose. That, in fact, is the whole point as to my having carefully explained, more than once, that there exists NO authenticated passenger manifest for either this or any other 9/11 flight. There exist made-up charts; but, there does not exist any publicly available, authenticated passenger manifests.


.
Click to expand...


Many of the family members still in mourning for their murdered loved ones saw them off at the airport. Their loved ones have not been seen alive since 9/11. Tell me Truther- where did they go? Many of those mourning familes recieved body parts of their murdered loved ones that were found at the crash sites. Where did those body parts come from?
Why do you care nothing for the people who were murdered, and why do you care even less for the mourning families?
What proof do you have that the passenger lists were fictional? That would mean the airlines were in on your imaginary conspiracy...
Prove it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom