Let me double check for accuracy: You are asking the above in a rhetorical fashion where you're really trying to say something other than the literal content, right? If so, what are you trying to say, please?
Surely, you grasp that there are any number of possibilities here, including that they are actual people who actually died. That is possible. However, where and how they died, if they did, has not ever been determined.
It is also possible the persons could be fictitious. Consider for instance, that one of them is, in fact, only represented by a stone image likeness, not even a photo of the person.
That, in and of itself, is vastly rich. It confirms that it simply doesn't take much to convince some of the truth of the common storyline of 9/11. A stone image will suffice to confirm the identity of a human being.
The foregoing is, in part, symbolic; and, in part forensic. There may actually be photographs of the 69 year old alleged passenger. The point, however, is that no such depiction was posted by Compus. Thus, posters here are required to infer a person from a stone image of one. I assume you'll allow as how what is said here is true, right?
Surely you jest. A seating chart is just that: A freakin' chart that could be made up by anyone for any purpose. That, in fact, is the whole point as to my having carefully explained, more than once, that there exists NO authenticated passenger manifest for either this or any other 9/11 flight. There exist made-up charts; but, there does not exist any publicly available, authenticated passenger manifests.
If you are like most, you are not in a position to discuss the above in detail; however, please feel free to provide any additional information that you are comfortable in posting, if there is any.
Last edited:
