Ed All 43 videos "Second Hit"" [Explosion]at WTC 2: Plane or No Plane?

[twinstead]

Well, right on cue, Event, but with added wordsalad to boot.

Yes, jesus, how many words does it take to say "that bit of evidence would be inconvenient to me therefore I choose to deny it", jamm?

 

[uke2se]

So do I win the MDC? Or did I have to predict the word salad to be eligible.

I don't think predicting that Jammonius will lie, distort, obfuscate, post nonsense or word salad would count as a psychic ability. It's basically a 1:1 probability.

 

[CompusMentus]

I don't think predicting that Jammonius will lie, distort, obfuscate, post nonsense or word salad would count as a psychic ability. It's basically a 1:1 probability.

We can add another couple of categories to jammonius' stock of evasions concerning 9/11.

DNA evidence? Planted.
Radar tracks? Falsified.
Video? Faked.
Audio? Inconclusive.
Eyewitnesses? Duped.
News Reports? Fabricated.
Expert Testimony? Corrupt .
Non-truther sources? Propaganda.
Victims? Imaginary.
Debris? Bogus.


Compus

 

[EventHorizon]

I don't think predicting that Jammonius will lie, distort, obfuscate, post nonsense or word salad would count as a psychic ability. It's basically a 1:1 probability.

Damn. I really could have used that million.

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

The people conducting the study were not collecting or documenting evidence and had no authority to do so; nor does it appear they even attempted any such investigation. The photo is a throw in, an after thought, as it were. They were studying the damage done to 130 Liberty Street.

And how do you suppose the AA lifevest got there? Are suggesting it just happened to be there? Do you think it was a hologram? It came from one of the planes that hit the WTC- you must be blind not to see that...The rooftop was strewn with debris from the towers and plane.
If you claim the vest is fake, what is your proof?

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

This is typical of debunker shenanigans. Always seeking to use bogus sources to make unsubstantiated claims.

and you make bogus claims with no evidence to back your assertions...

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

Sombody help me, what relevance do the victims' age have? It seems to me that it's simply more padding for Jam's posts in an attempt to make them seem more sciency. Am I on the mark?

I think the ages are just random numbers to Jam, because these people never existed in his warped world view.
He doesn't care about them, to him, they are just names.

 

[fess]

Continuation of Review and assessment of Simulation of alleged Flight 175 Flight from video posted by Bill Smith:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jop84...eature=channel

In this next segment, we have the beginning of the process of reconstructing the 4min40sec flight path, with particular emphasis on altitude, descent, ground speed and air speed from points G to F, as follows:

So, Jammy is going to play pilot again. He is joining the ranks of one of the most idiotic morons to ever utter the word aviation in order to try and prove the flight path of Flight 175 is false. Well, continue on Jammy, this could be one of the most interesting, or should I say hilarious, posts ever made by Jam Boy.

For those who lack patience, the video concludes that the flight path completely contradicts the video depictions; or, vice versa. Accordingly, the NO PLANE claim as it relates to alleged Flight 175 is strengthened by this forensic evidence.

Good Lord Jammy, you claim this idiotic video to be forensic evidence!

 

[sylvan8798]

76 pages? Really?

 

[Ron_Tomkins]

You know... I'm from the opinion that continuing to feed mentally ill people who dedicate hours of their life to extend on bogus conspiracy theories, is not something that's beneficial for anyone.

Someone should just close this thread.

 

[triforcharity]

Jammos, at the time of posting, has 1,711 posts. Of those 1,711 posts, not one have made any lick of sense. In baseball, we call that an "Oh-For" Meaning, a batting average of .000

Now, if you add the numbers 1-7-1 you get nine. If you put the 11 back on it, you get 9/11. Proof positive that it was Jamm that caused 9/11. He was the hijacker.

Prove me wrong.

 

[beachnut]

You know... I'm from the opinion that continuing to feed mentally ill people who dedicate hours of their life to extend on bogus conspiracy theories, is not something that's beneficial for anyone.

Someone should just close this thread.

Yes!

 

[fess]

sylvan8798 76 pages? Really?

Ron_Tomkins You know... I'm from the opinion that continuing to feed mentally ill people who dedicate hours of their life to extend on bogus conspiracy theories, is not something that's beneficial for anyone.

Someone should just close this thread.

beachnut Yes

I agree.
You know, if all of the meaningless idiotic posts made by Jammonius were deleted, we would still be on page #1.

 

[Bell]

76 pages? Really?

You weren't around in Christopera's time

 

[dafydd]

You know... I'm from the opinion that continuing to feed mentally ill people who dedicate hours of their life to extend on bogus conspiracy theories, is not something that's beneficial for anyone.

Someone should just close this thread.

I agree.Is there any way that I could ascertain Jammy's whereabouts? I would like to inform the local authorities about his mental condition,with a view to having him sectioned.

 

[BadBoy]

I've added some random numbers:

Moons of Mars: 2
Spreadsheet program: 123
Legs on a cat: 4
City speed limit: 65
Colors in a rainbow: 7
Pips on a die: 21
-------------------------+
Total: 222

Average number = 37

Draw your own conclusion.

I seen a three legged cat once, so thats not strictly true.

 

[BadBoy]

I seen a three legged cat once, so thats not strictly true.

A real investigative journalist would find these people and ask them if their accounts as reported were true. It could easily be verifiable. If it looked like the majority of people had been misrepresented in terms of whether they seen the impact or not then... well then Jams would need to move onto the next question why so many videos recorded the impact.

Also, by trying to discount the list of eye witness statements as hearsay, then he is implying that the multiple sources for these witness accounts are in on the conspiracy


looony tunes. Jams is a sad man

 

[excaza]

Needless to say, all of that special handling and secrecy almost certainly has nothing at all to do with simple mold. That building was compromised by DEW and that is why it is being handled so ginerly and oh so slowly.

How do DEWs work in your imaginary dream land? More of this non-self-quenching nonsense?

 

[jammonius]

Sombody help me, what relevance do the victims' age have? It seems to me that it's simply more padding for Jam's posts in an attempt to make them seem more sciency. Am I on the mark?

Uke2se

Assuming your request for "help" is legitimate, despite 9/11 world being one where "denial" is predominant, I will here try to help you understand.


Let's do it with a picture because, as you know, they are worth 1000words:

That picture tells us that there are 3 persons pictured and one stone image pictured whereby, because of age, the persons and the stone image probably could not have done a darn thing to thwart a supposed hijacking.

As "help" is not the same as spoon-feeding, I will here pause and ask that you confirm that you are comfortable in a) deducing who the three people and the one stone image are; and b) that it is proper to infer that because of age they probably could not have been expected to thwart a hijacking.

After you post on the foregoing, I will revert with more help and more discussion. As well, I will likely add to the picture/age correlation collection based on Compus' anticipated posting.

 

[djlunacee]

Well, it took me about the same amount of time to determine that proper claim to identifying that supposed life vest as having anything at all to do with 9/11 cannot be made.

That photo comes from a source, that by its own claim, had the following as and for its purpose:

"The objectives of the work described in this paper were two-fold: (1) to
collect information about the structural and nonstructural damage suffered by
the building at 130 Liberty Plaza due to the collapse of tower 2, and (2) to
investigate whether simple numerical tools used in the structural analysis of
buildings can be used to help explain the observed structural behavior. The
first objective was achieved by the September 23 walk-through of the
building. Summary information on the building damage is presented in the
reconnaissance section. The second objective was addressed using linear and
nonlinear analysis tools that are used by earthquake engineers. Berman et al.
(2002) and Warn et al. (forthcoming) present detailed information on the
September 23 reconnaissance and the subsequent studies."

See: pgs. 1-2/42

Source: http://www.colorado.edu/hazards/publications/sp/sp39/sept11book_ch8_warn.pdf

This is typical of debunker shenanigans. Always seeking to use bogus sources to make unsubstantiated claims. That study does not have any way of substantiating the claim the lifevest comes from Flight 11 -- remember, as well, that this is a thread dealing, not with American Flight 11, but with United 175. So, at the outset, the AA lifevest is a stupid derail in any event.

The people conducting the study were not collecting or documenting evidence and had no authority to do so; nor does it appear they even attempted any such investigation. The photo is a throw in, an after thought, as it were. They were studying the damage done to 130 Liberty Street.

That is not how research is conducted; instead, that is how propaganda is engaged in.

Please cut the crap and check your sources for validity and for reliability before subjecting yourself to easy refutation.

Furthermore, even as to its stated purpose, the exercise the writers of that study engaged in was obviously fubar.

130 Liberty Street is being dismantled, apparently on a stick by stick, stone by stone, beam by beam basis because it has mold.

It still hasn't been removed to this very day, nearly nine years later. SAIC still has the building shrouded in secrecy, covered, hidden and obscured.

Needless to say, all of that special handling and secrecy almost certainly has nothing at all to do with simple mold. That building was compromised by DEW and that is why it is being handled so ginerly and oh so slowly.

The study may prove useful because as of the date it was initiated, 9/21/01, it described the damage to the building in simple terms, giving no hiint at all that nine years later the building would be shrouded in secrecy and mystery, still standing. In the interim, it has caused mysterious death and has had inexplicable fires and has been both repaired and then declared unfit and then declared nearly impossible to demolish, absent the most special care imaginable.

Your study does not foretell anything of what was to come.

Thanks for posting that article. Some good use may come of it.

Meanwhile, as to your lifevest claim, do better.

sheesh

you should really learn what you are talking about before making stupid claims.
try reading this:

http://www.renewnyc.com/plan_des_dev/130liberty/

Contained is all the information regarding the deconstruction of 130 liberty street, detailed reports, processes, plans, the whole kit and kaboodle.

http://www.renewnyc.com/content/pdfs/130liberty/090513_Bovis_ EHSP.pdf

This document is the environmental, health and emergency plan for the project. Read it and learn.

DEW claim? Unproven Fantasy.

Thank you once again Jammonious for showing us you are nothing more than a blowhard. We can add this to the proof you have no clue what you are talking about.