Banned Book:The Hoax of the Twentieth Century

[eerok]

Do you have to turn your head sideways to be able to read others' posts in such a slanted manner?

They always do that -- it makes it easier to nuzzle the walls of their colons.

(Gah, somebody stop me, I seem to have poor impulse control when it comes to hateful revisionists.)

 

[Marduk]

The problem is if you were to create such a party in Germany, that party would soon been banned.

Careful now, thats just how Nazi Germany started

"The Diary of Anne Frank" a historical report? You might want to research that.

No problem, any idea where she is now so we can ask her ?

 

[MG1962]

So you agree the Jews redefined the word "Holocaust" in the 1970s.

Does it matter - they could change the name to Robert - still doesn't change what phyiscally happened

 

[Thunder]

There were no holocaust movies in the 1940's, 50's or 60's

Judgement at Nuremberg, 1961.

 

[eerok]

Judgement at Nuremberg, 1961.

That was a great film.

 

[shandyjan]

This essay written in the 90's hasnt had any revisionist response. Interesting essay!

"So how was the world led to believe that something called a "Holocaust" happened in the middle of this century? Well, it's all a big hoax, we're told, in books with titles like The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. We're being scammed. We're being fooled.

But hoaxes don't form spontaneously. A hoax implies a hoaxer. There are no scams without scam artists.

What are we really being told? Let's look at the world through their eyes, let's look at things from this fantasy point of view. "

http://www.holocaust-history.org/~jamie/the-hoax.shtml

 

[Gawdzilla Sama]

There were no holocaust movies in the 1940's, 50's or 60's and then circa 1974 Did Six Million Really Die? (www.zundelsite.org/harwood/didsix00.html ) was published. Then in 1976 came The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. After these two works started to gain attention the "Holocaust" mini series was first broadcast in 1978. This opened the floodgates to an avalanche of holocaust propaganda so that not a week goes by without a movie, tv show or documentary about the subject. Total overkill. The victims of Stalin vastly outnumber those of Hitler but there is no comparable amount of film or tv time for them.

"Judgment at Nuremberg" comes to mind immediately. If you were worth further debunking I could probably come up with more. And there were the newsreels and reports by people who had been there, like George Patton and Dwight Eisenhower.

 

[Arisia]

"Judgment at Nuremberg" comes to mind immediately. If you were worth further debunking I could probably come up with more. And there were the newsreels and reports by people who had been there, like George Patton and Dwight Eisenhower.

Now Gawdzilla, you know that most Americans might consider those two heroes, but the deniers know them for what they really are, shills for them nasty Joos.

 

[dudalb]

I agree with Mondial on one point:

This book should not be banned.

This book should be sold to all people who want to read it to have a good example of misinformation, racism, historical inaccuracy and a good laugh.

Butz's book serves a valuable purpose as an example of incredibly incompetent historical research, and how NOT to write history.

 

[MG1962]

"Judgment at Nuremberg" comes to mind immediately. If you were worth further debunking I could probably come up with more. And there were the newsreels and reports by people who had been there, like George Patton and Dwight Eisenhower.

And it is fascinating what Ike had to say

I made the visit deliberately, in order to be in a position to give first-hand evidence of these things if ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to charge these allegations merely to ‘propaganda.’

 

[fromdownunder]

Judgement at Nuremberg, 1961.

Exodus. 1960

Norm

 

[dudalb]

The Climax of 1963's "The VIctors" takes place in a concentration Camp.

 

[eerok]

The holocaust was a huge wrong. The lesson is that we can be led into horror. We are fragile beings, and prone to error, and we must protect ourselves from future crimes of this magnitude against our own. We must accept that we can be duped into forgoing our humanity, and we must strive against it.

Bonehead revisionists notwithstanding.

 

[ParrotPirate]

Mondial MagZ = Ignore. I feel no need to listen/see anything that this kind of cretin would have to say on any subject.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Anyone who denies the Holocaust should have a Swastika carved in their ignorant faces.

·
·
·​

SERIOUSLY?! ARE YOU DERANGED?!

You just advocated violently mutilating anyone who expresses a belief that you don't agree with, and you're the one calling others “deranged”?

 

[timhau]

Anyone who denies the Holocaust should have a Swastika carved in their ignorant faces.

 

[Meadmaker]

The "Holocaust" was invented in the 1970s, before that the word never referred to Jews.

Not quite. The word wasn't in common parlance before the 1970's. However, among Jews, the word "shoah" had been used frequently. After the miniseries used the English translation of that word as its title, it became the most common word to describe the attempted extermination of the Jews.

ETA: "Shoah" is also sometimes translated as "catastrophe".

 

[Meadmaker]

Is that a violin I hear?

I wondered how a holocaust denier would respond to a story such as mine. Now I know. I can't say I'm surprised, but it does make me sad to see how someone can so wilfully avoid the obvious truth.

For what it's worth, I have no clue what you are referring to above.

 

[Architect]

However, here in the United states, unlike those other nations mentioned in the OP, we believe that one has a right to believe what he will, and to express these beliefs, no matter how whacky others may think these beliefs to be.

This is what sets a free nation, such as the United States, apart from those wretched nations mentioned in the OP, that have no idea what freedom is really about.

You know, Bob, some time ago we started a "Freedom" thread over in Politics (as it was then) asking people who came up with this kind of comment of yours a chance to substantiate it. So, for example, Europeans have a right to freedom of speech under the ECHR and hence the kind of flag waving here is .... misplaced.

Feel free to revisit that thread. Or, alternatively, go and do a little studying before climbing on that high horse of yours.

 

[timhau]

The "Holocaust" was invented in the 1970s, before that the word never referred to Jews.

Actually, if you bothered to look at Wikipedia before making this linguistic (not historical, linguistic) argument, you'd find this:

For hundreds of years, the word holocaust was used in English to denote massive sacrifices and great slaughters or massacres. During World War II, the word was used to describe Nazi atrocities regardless of whether the victims were Jews or non-Jews. Since the 1960s, the term has come to be used by scholars and popular writers to refer exclusively to the genocide of Jews.[4]

The term entered common parlance after 1978, the year that the popular Holocaust (TV miniseries) was broadcast on the American NBC television network.

Oh, but that's Wikipedia, not Retardopedia Metapedia. It's run by Joos. Silly me.

However, there's just one thing that bugs me... if the Jews are crafty enough to run everything despite their relatively small numbers, doesn't that mean that they are the masterrace? Theirs is already a lot closer to being a thousand-year nation than certain others I could mention.