• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Care to Comment

Ah yes I see, like here:



Glad it was dustified when it reached the car, otherwise it would probably have been destroyed.

Enough derailing for now. I'll grab some popcorn.

Oooogh!:eye-poppi
Do you try to tell me that the real WTC tower was hit at an elevation of about 6 meters all all all the fuel went down the stubby shaft in one sip.
...that's a big movie! I try to imagine that sip slipping through the side of cabin 50 and >SPLASH< exploded in the cellar.

I have an Ice cream! (orange taste)
 
On the other hand maybe it made sense to demolish those particular columns first for purely structural reasons.
Makes sense! You just had to drive down the ramp and park next to the columns. ...after the documents at the SEC floors were gone, of course.
 
Makes sense! You just had to drive down the ramp and park next to the columns. ...after the documents at the SEC floors were gone, of course.
What is your conclusion for WTC7? Nuke, Beam Weapon, Thermite, or super secret silent explosives? What engineering school did you get your degree from?

Nuke, or the Judy Beam Weapon? Thermite is not available there was no products from thermite reactions. Silent explosives are pure nonsense for insane dolts. What is your super conclusion, or delusion?

Fire did it; darn! That was so simple. Saved you 8 more years of failure if you did not pick fire!
 
Makes sense! You just had to drive down the ramp and park next to the columns. ...after the documents at the SEC floors were gone, of course.
The Enron and Worldcom documents are an obvious red herring. They could have been destroyed anytime, inside or outside of WTC7. Perhaps they were never even there.
 
What is your conclusion for WTC7? Nuke, Beam Weapon, Thermite, or super secret silent explosives?
Why super silent? If you don't like the noise just put it in the basement.

What engineering school did you get your degree from?
It was an old university. Where did you learn something?

Nuke, or the Judy Beam Weapon?
Nobody took that serious, did you? I think Judy was just a staged gag or something. Maybe she got money for it, you know, to do something funny in the name of the twoofers or something like that.

Thermite is not available there was no products from thermite reactions.
How do you know that? Are you the one who sold the pile to China?

Silent explosives are pure nonsense for insane dolts. What is your super conclusion, or delusion?
My conclusion is you try to manipulate me by saying this is not available and that is not possible and this is just for idiots and so on. The left range of possible answers lies somewhere between "super conclusion" and "delusion".

Fire did it; darn! That was so simple. Saved you 8 more years of failure if you did not pick fire!
Now I'm flabbergasted! That simple. ...but it was a very hot fire, I guess. I mean a very very hot fire. And rapid may be. Do you agree?
 
The Enron and Worldcom documents are an obvious red herring. They could have been destroyed anytime, inside or outside of WTC7. Perhaps they were never even there.
These documents were there and it was the only place you could find them. It was the biggest white-collar crime at that time. Nobody would put those documents in his briefcase without trying to commit suicide.
Oh, there was a second scandal of that scale. The Pentagon missed some billions of Dollars.

No hard feelings! It's just money! It's not about love or something real important.
 
Last edited:
The "pentagon scandal" related to the fact the the systems at the Pentagon for accounting weren't able to be reconciled with one another. There is no evidence that I've ever seen that there were billions of actual missing dollars, do you have a reliable source for this with an unambiguous statement.
 
Last edited:
There is one more perspective issue to be considered.
The bowing of the north face and the West St perspective created the myth of a "visible" east west progression. That isn't the case either.
[qimg]http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/4230/wtc7twist.gif[/qimg]
Argument from a rather terrible photoshopping job it looks to me... Is this your first time arguing with a photo-manip?

Must be a typo. I think you want me to find a steel building that burnt for hours and totally collapsed???
...well, I think somewhere was that warehouse full of fuel with an unprotected roof. The roof collapsed.

I mean, otherwise...
beijingtorch.jpg
One can learn a lot from a conspiracy theorist argument in its natural habitat. Notice here how the argument flips to "no steel building has ever collapsed before" where the theorist argues that first time events of any kind are impossible because they have never happened before. Instead of researching based on cause and effect and expressing any level of research capacity he sees fit to to lock himself into an unusual paradoxical argument. Phenomenal!
 
Last edited:
Argument from a rather terrible photoshopping job it looks to me... Is this your first time arguing with a photo-manip?
NIST used a photoshopped video to measure the fall speed? That's a shocking news. But it could explain why I never found a version with the unedited sound. Maybe 9/11 was photoshopped somehow. I mean these strange visa applications and all that stuff. ...or for example the Portland surveillance video? Maybe that's why it was never captured by a usual video capture device. I always wondered why the so called "hi res" stills show some screen matrix like being photographed from a screen. I mean these "hi res" were used as evidence in the Moussaoui trail. They really would have captured that video if it would exist, wouldn't they? ...maybe without the second jumping timestamp. What would you say?

One can learn a lot from a conspiracy theorist argument in its natural habitat. Notice here how the argument flips to "no steel building has ever collapsed before" where the theorist argues that first time events of any kind are impossible because they have never happened before. Instead of researching based on cause and effect and expressing any level of research capacity he sees fit to to lock himself into an unusual paradoxical argument. Phenomenal!
Wow, you observed that species a lot I think. Do you had to leave your natural habitat to do so? It's somehow funny how your argument immediately flipped to "photoshopped" when confronted with the obvious.

Cause: perspective
Effect: wrong measurement
paradoxical argument: photoshopped

http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/5567/stfu1.jpg

Edited by Tricky: 
Edited for Rule 10.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seriously? The 2.3 trillion nonsense was debunked years ago, please catch up.
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Missing_Trillions

911myth: "...so the fact that Rumsfeld mentioned the $2.3 trillion again on 9/10 seems to have no special importance."

That sounds not like "2.3 trillion nonsense was debunked". Btw, the 911myths website is always amusing. Thanks for the link.

Of course, it had no special importance but the 2.3 trillion were somewhere lost between the computer systems and no one knew or knows where. It would have taken a looooong time to track that money. ...and the very next day there was a lot more important thing to do, right?
 
Last edited:
911myth: "...so the fact that Rumsfeld mentioned the $2.3 trillion again on 9/10 seems to have no special importance."

That sounds not like "2.3 trillion nonsense was debunked". Btw, the 911myths website is always amusing. Thanks for the link.

Nice quote mining pal. Read the whole thing. 9/11myths uses actual sources, not some youtube video as evidence. LMAO, the irony is absolutely hilarious.
 
Nice quote mining pal. Read the whole thing. 9/11myths uses actual sources, not some youtube video as evidence. LMAO, the irony is absolutely hilarious.
You mean that CBS News or the House Armed Services Committee or the Senate Conformation Hearings on YouTube are no actual sources because it's on YouTube? That's a myth! You should watch the whole thing and save your ass!

the 9/11myths actual source says:
pdrop00017.png
 
Last edited:
Hi Tom!
Any idea how the fuel reached B3?
Psssst! I would try to watch it but it's too late now.

Sure. I can think of a half dozen ways in which the fuel made it to the basement. They all constitute the same thing, of course. It fell down the elevator shafts.

What do you think happens to 2 tanker trucks sized boluses of fuel that are traveling 500 mph? What is the density requirement for fuel to ignite? What do you think happens to the density of fuel/air the instant that it ignites? When the fuel/air mixture ignites, and its density is a couple of orders of magnitude less than the liquid fuel, and its surface area is a couple orders of magnitude larger, and everything is moving thru the air at some fraction of 500 mph, what do you think happens to the relative spacing between the ignited fuel and the still liquid fuel?

Have you ever seen liquid fuel pouring out of an airplane's broken fuel tank that catches on fire? You might be interested in the phenomenon.

All of that is merely interesting physics. Let's step back a couple of steps from the trees and look at the forest.

Many, many people in the lobby and basement reported the strong smell of aviation fuel. There were people who suffered horrible burns. There were reports of elevator doors being blown out & flames pouring out of the elevator shafts.

So please explain to me what difference it makes whether my (or anyone's) explanation turns out to be THE explanation? Or just AN explanation?

Are you claiming that there was no fuel down the lower elevator shafts? That all those people were lying? Do you agree that the fuel could have gotten to the lobby, but the last 6 stories into the basement were impossible?

That, in addition to everything else, someone prepositioned huge quantities of jet fuels in some sort of "odor proof" containers (there were no reports that I've heard of the aroma prior to the plane's impacts), and then somehow released all that fuel by remote control. And then detonated it?

Is that about the score?

Or are you saying ... nothing at all?

BTW, please don't stop trading ideas back & forth with bill. It is VERY entertaining.
 
Last edited:
You mean that CBS News or the House Armed Services Committee or the Senate Conformation Hearings on YouTube are no actual sources because it's on YouTube? That's a myth! You should watch the whole thing and save your ass!

No, what I find funny is that you dismiss actual sources because it comes from a site that destroys your fantasy. Dumping a youtube video is the truther standard of making an argument. 2.3 trillion dollars missing is what 2 of your video titles say, but never proven. Why is that? The other is from a conspiracy kook congresswoman who got run out of office.

The 9/11myths site, on the other hand, makes arguments and backs them with sources, not an unsubstantiated youtube dump. Tell me, how do accounting errors equal an inside job?
 
I've seen the videos they are about a technology problem and getting funding to fix it. That's what they're about. There's no 2.3 trillion missing from anywhere. The entire discussion revolves around integrating the accounting systems within the DOD. You don't seem to understand the difference between "Missing Money" and unaccounted for money. I took three hundred out of the bank last week and now I have one hundred. I have no clear documentation to prove where the two hundred went but to use the term missing is simply misleading.
 
Sure. I can think of a half dozen ways in which the fuel made it to the basement. They all constitute the same thing, of course. It fell down the elevator shafts.

What do you think happens to 2 tanker trucks sized boluses of fuel that are traveling 500 mph? What is the density requirement for fuel to ignite? What do you think happens to the density of fuel/air the instant that it ignites? When the fuel/air mixture ignites, and its density is a couple of orders of magnitude less than the liquid fuel, and its surface area is a couple orders of magnitude larger, and everything is moving thru the air at some fraction of 500 mph, what do you think happens to the relative spacing between the ignited fuel and the still liquid fuel?
No question about that. We all saw the fireballs which consumed at least one tanker truck sized bolus of fuel per tower.

... Many, many people in the lobby and basement reported the strong smell of aviation fuel. There were people who suffered horrible burns. There were reports of elevator doors being blown out & flames pouring out of the elevator shafts.
Absolutely correct. That smell was all over lower Manhattan. Even Dom Foulsham reported a smell like on a runway several block away.
Laureen Manning (I cited above) suffered horrible burns. She came right through the revolving door and the fire pushed her back outside (through the bottom of an elevator bank).
The most detailed report of blown out elevator doors and twisted cabins in the shafts is the Task Force Interview of William Walsh. These blown out doors in the Lobby were right opposite to the West revolving doors and consistent with the observable damage. These elevators were local elevators up to the 30-something floors. That's indeed a problem.

So please explain to me what difference it makes whether my (or anyone's) explanation turns out to be THE explanation? Or just AN explanation?

THE explanation explains
- why the locals were blown out
- why the doors of the express shafts were intact
- how huge amounts of vaporized fuel managed to travel down the shaft in seconds even if the drop time depends on the diameter of the droplets and these droplets probably were smaller than a football
- how huge amounts of vaporized fuel managed to reach the floors below the express cabins (all at B1)
- how the passengers of car 50 survived those "explosions" above and below without burns or being washed with fuel

AN explanation explains nothing but says
- fuel went down the elevator shafts and exploded at 21, lobby, B2, B3, B4

Are you claiming that there was no fuel down the lower elevator shafts?
Maybe later but it didn't explode.

That all those people were lying?
Those people were lied to. I heard no witness report saying "the fuel came down the elevator shaft and ..." Even the Naudet documentary says: "Later they figured out that jet fuel shot down the elevator shafts..."
On 9/11 these witnesses reported explosions in the basement not jet fuel fireballs. Philip Morelli was told that the main freight car (50) crashed into the pit but that didn't happen either. Last possibility: debris or the counter weights crashed into the pits but all cabins at B1 blocked the shafts and were not crushed. On the other hands these counter weights have emergency brakes like the cabins. So what happened within a few seconds of the plane crash??

Do you agree that the fuel could have gotten to the lobby, but the last 6 stories into the basement were impossible?
It's a question of time for the fuel to reach some distant point like the lobby or even the basement. It's another question to get it that far unburnt. It's another problem to get it in a proper fuel-air ratio. And last but not least it is a problem the get several explosions on different levels.

That, in addition to everything else, someone prepositioned huge quantities of jet fuels in some sort of "odor proof" containers (there were no reports that I've heard of the aroma prior to the plane's impacts), and then somehow released all that fuel by remote control. And then detonated it?
No, the smell was everywhere. Something exploded in the basement and caused a lot of damage withing seconds after the impact. What ever it was, it caused a lot of injuries and damage to the entire west side of the lobby and the local elevator shafts.

Or are you saying ... nothing at all?
Can you solve the problem or can you just repeat some illogical story or nothing at all?

BTW, please don't stop trading ideas back & forth with bill. It is VERY entertaining.
I have to go to sleep. Just 3 hours left of my night and Bill is gone. So get some chips and please stand by.
 
No, ... dump. Tell me, how do accounting errors equal an inside job?
The 911myth sources are mostly DOD or military telling that back in 2000 the problem was almost solved. ...just some billion were lost. ...and for 2001 the necessary manpower was killed in the Pentagon attack ...but a lot of the money can now be accounted for ...
Where is one member of the senate who saw that list a said something like "well done"? ...a YouTube link would do it.

...accounting errors equal an inside job? That's not what I said. I said there was another major scandal besides Enron.
 

Back
Top Bottom