Is there really a "Journolist?"

leftysergeant said:
Read what the smelly little sack of compost wrote. He tried to pass this off as a reflection of Shirely Sherrod's racist attitude, and the responce of the audience as an example of how racist the NAACP is. This was an effort to take revenge for the NAACP calling the teatrash "racists" He slimed Sherrod knowing that people tend to get hurt when he barfs on them.


I detect signs of mental illness in the way in which maggot boy presents his arguements.

He claims not to have edited the video, but the arguement is as lame as Palin's "death panels" arguement against the health care bill.

If he did not see the full tape, then the drooling idiot had no idea what he was presenting, which indicates an IQ about twenty short of needing a legal guardian.

If he did see the full tape, he is simply evil for having presented it as proof that Sherrod is a racist and that NAACP approves of that.

The boy is garbage either way you look at it, and the people who hold him up as a hero need to re-examine their own souls.
Click to expand...

You're throwing all kinds of mud against the wall hoping that some of it will stick. However, you've offered nothing of substance. That you don't like Breitbart is obvious. But that seems to be more due to ideological differences than to anything egregious that Breitbart has done. Because it's now quite apparent that Breitbart hasn't done anything wrong at all.
 
Kegeshook said:
Because it's now quite apparent that Breitbart hasn't done anything wrong at all.
Click to expand...

Have you heard of Wikipedia? Or Google?

These were all well-reported controversies, it's not like you couldn't have gotten the information you claim to have wanted in a few minutes with a minimum amount of effort.
 
Kevin_Lowe said:
Have you heard of Wikipedia? Or Google?

These were all well-reported controversies, it's not like you couldn't have gotten the information you claim to have wanted in a few minutes with a minimum amount of effort.
Click to expand...

One can find all kinds of nonsense on the internet. I have yet to see anything of substance showing Breitbart to be evil.
 
Kegeshook said:
One can find all kinds of nonsense on the internet. I have yet to see anything of substance showing Breitbart to be evil.
Click to expand...
.
When I was first made aware of this, was on CNN, where they presented the original tape, and then the whole thing.
The obvious intent to destroy the career of Ms. Sherrod was completely obvious.
Breitbart's distancing himself from that intent is evil by any standards.
It was deliberate on his part, and he continues to try to deceive, based on the absurd responses of Obie's guys and the NAACP, to the original fraudulent presentation.
 
Kegeshook said:
One can find all kinds of nonsense on the internet. I have yet to see anything of substance showing Breitbart to be evil.
Click to expand...
He deliberately lied about people and organizations in order to harrass them, cause them loss of income, perhaps make it harder for them to be elected because of lies, or to bring criminal investigations against them when he knows they committed no such crimes as he alledges.

That is considered evil by just about any civilized society that recognizes that there is such a thing as evil. It's called "perjury."
 
Cicero said:
You would think he would have learned his lesson from the masters.
Click to expand...

Notamusing. Rather had reason to believe that the stuff he was gven was genuine.

Breitbart knows his stuff came out of the poynso because he created it himself.
 
leftysergeant said:
Notamusing. Rather had reason to believe that the stuff he was gven was genuine.
Click to expand...

Too bad none of the reasons were valid.

"After a stubborn 12-day defense of the story, CBS News conceded that it could not confirm the authenticity of the documents and asked former Attorney General Dick Thornburgh and former Associated Press President Louis Boccardi to conduct an independent investigation into the matter."

Breitbart knows his stuff came out of the poynso because he created it himself.
Click to expand...

What? Breitbart is not the source of the edited video. Not to mention that the NAACP had access to the unedited video and still condemned her.
 
Kevin_Lowe said:
Here is a post of mine on the issue.

Short version, some journalists did get together to discuss how to spin the news to favour the Democratic party over the Republican.

This doesn't exactly overturn the existing hard data showing that "liberal media bias" overall is a myth cooked up by US conservatives who mistake balance for persecution, but it certainly does prove that individual journalists were grinding the Democratic party axe as hard as they could.
Click to expand...
And just to be clear, this doesn't have anything to do with my complaint that the ethics of the right and left are not the same at the moment. The claim "both sides do it" is baloney at this point in time.
 
leftysergeant said:
Okay, I see rightwingers (usually the most over-the-top of them,, referring to a mallevolent political entity they call "Journolist."

I never heard of it. I make no referrence to it in my posts. I see that no other lefty does.

Does it exist? What is it?

Or is this another "Ewige Jude?"
Click to expand...

It sounds as idiotic as someone referring to the Republican Party as the Republic Party. In other words, someone we should laugh at.
 
leftysergeant said:
He deliberately lied about people and organizations in order to harrass them, cause them loss of income, perhaps make it harder for them to be elected because of lies, or to bring criminal investigations against them when he knows they committed no such crimes as he alledges.

That is considered evil by just about any civilized society that recognizes that there is such a thing as evil. It's called "perjury."
Click to expand...

Again, you make the charge that he deliberately lied and yet you fail to offer any substantiation to back up the charge. What's your problem anyway? Either put up or shut up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom