Who started both World Wars?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Captain_Swoop said:
How about a couple of hundred years of Colonial exploitation?
Click to expand...

Ah yes, that old lefty song. BTW large parts of Africa were not colonized for centuries, but only during the 'Scramble for Africa', late 19th century. Canada was a colony also. Looks like they recovered fine from the British onslaught. India, thanks to their IQ80 average and population of some 1.5 billion, meaning gigantic enough to have a sizeable portion of IQ120+ to at least have an IT-industry.

Here is the map of global human IQ-distribution:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:InvertedIQbyCountry.png

Looking at the map you immediately understand who is going to be the next top dog in the world: China. Population some 1.3 billion with an average IQ higher than that of the US with population of 400 million.

And you also see that Africa sadly will never get anywhere.

You do realize that Rhodesia was the best Africa could ever hope for: a well organized country under white leadership, advantageous even for the blacks, now turned into an average African nightmare under black rule. The whites are leaving the country and the country collapses.

Time magazine in a rare moment of honesty says it well:

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1713275,00.html
Come Back, Colonialism, All Is Forgiven
"When the Belgians and the Portuguese were here, there were farms and plantations — cashews, peanuts, rubber, palm oil. There was industry and factories employing 3,000 people, 5,000 people. But since independence, no Congolese has succeeded. The plantations are abandoned."

For many Congolese like Le Blanc, the difficulties of today blot out the cruelties of the past. "On this river, all that you see — the buildings, the boats — only whites did that. After the whites left, the Congolese did not work. We did not know how to. For the past 50 years, we've just declined." He pauses. "They took this country by force," he says, with more than a touch of admiration. "If they came back, this time we'd give them the country for free."
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
9/11-investigator said:
That's 'Diamond' as in Rubin, Perle, Silverstein, Goldstein, Safire... etc.?
Click to expand...

Okay, I should have seen this particular kind of nonsense coming. Only flaming Nazi gasbags think information is incorrect just because the one who presents it is a Jew. Of course, in the minds of sane people, this is a non-issue, but you probably think you have a reason for bringing this up.

I see.

And what did the good Jared give as an explanation?
Click to expand...

Climate. Geography. Flora and fauna.

For example, you cannot domesticate the horse if the place you live in does not have any horses. You will not use the wheel for much in transportation if you do not have any animals capable of pulling wagons. That sort of thing.
 
9/11-investigator said:
Makes me curious for your explanation as to why the European world isdeveloped and Africa is nowhere?
Click to expand...

It doesn't have much to do with race, anyway. Europe has gotten somewhere because of the influence of previous civilisations such as Greece and Rome (itself influenced by Greece). Germans, I'll remind you, were getting nowhere before they were civilised by the nations they conquered.

But this remark of yours clearly shows that you have no grasp of the concept of statistical distribution.
Click to expand...

That's only because you interpreted it wrong.

That it is worthwhile to prevent Europe from turning into another jungle.
Click to expand...

Meanwhile nothing is preventing your posts from turning into another word salad.
 
Chaos said:
Only flaming Nazi gasbags think information is incorrect just because the one who presents it is a Jew.
Click to expand...

There's another side to this, of course: if they don't like the information they're presented, the definition of "Jew" is expanded to cover the source of the information. Some while back in this thread, I appear to have become Jewish.

Dave
 
Chaos said:
Climate. Geography. Flora and fauna.

For example, you cannot domesticate the horse if the place you live in does not have any horses. You will not use the wheel for much in transportation if you do not have any animals capable of pulling wagons. That sort of thing.
Click to expand...

Well, I see that the good Jared does not buy into the 'centuries of exploitation' nonsense of Captain_Swoop as an explanation for why Africa got nowhere.

Not that 'Flora, fauna and horses' make any sense either, OMG... these ingredients are solely good for horse manure! :D

I stick with IQ if you don't mind as the main reason, although I would not rule out that climate could have contributed a lot to apathy characteristic for the tropics. Nevertheless, the descendents of the Dutch were able to establish a good European level society in Southern Africa, so did the Brits in Rhodesia. Hence climate is not an absolute obstacle.

But I realize that talking like this is considered cursing in the NWO church.
The church, you will remember, that is going to be utterly demolished this decade in sync with the decline of America.
 
Last edited:
Chaos said:
Jared Diamond explained this long ago in "Guns, Germs and Steel". Not that any Nazi-worshipping racist scumbags ever let that get in the way of their bigotry, of course.
Click to expand...

I doubt NEI would like that book, as it argues that people in primitive cultures may be, on average, smarter than those in developed cultures - and that it says that the Germanic tribes weren't as advanced as their southern European neighbors. All in all, though, it's quite educational.
 
9/11-investigator said:
Well, I see that the good Jared does not buy into the 'centuries of exploitation' nonsense of Captain_Swoop as an explanation for why Africa got nowhere.
Click to expand...

Tens of thousands of years of bad geography beat hundreds of years of exploitation.

Not that 'Flora, fauna and horses' make any sense either, OMG... these ingredients are solely good for horse manure! :D
Click to expand...

Spoken with the certainty of total ignorance - as usual.

I stick with IQ if you don't mind as the main reason, although I would not rule out that climate could have contributed a lot to apathy characteristic for the tropics. Nevertheless, the descendents of the Dutch were able to establish a good European level society in Southern Africa, so did the Brits in Rhodesia. Hence climate is not an absolute obstacle.

But I realize that talking like this is considered cursing in the NWO church.
The church, you will remember, that is going to be utterly demolished this decade in sync with the decline of America.
Click to expand...

No. It is - rightly - considered WRONG in sane society, that´s all. Of course, flaming Nazi gasbags don´t understand that; because they rabidly hate anyone who is different from them, their tiny, atrophied brains cannot grasp the concept that others do not, in fact, quarrel with their facts rather than hating the flaming Nazi gasbags out of what passes for general principle among flaming Nazi gasbags.
 
I would think there's a very strong inverse relation between the advance of technology and the amount of hunter-gathering necessary to sustain life. A lot of the African population has been pretty much nomadic throughout history, I can't see how being constantly changing location would be advantageous to technological advancement in areas that aren't directly related to hunting and mobility. Yes, there have been some very powerful kingdoms in Africa throughout history, but it seems like most of the technological innovation has come from kingdoms with established agriculture, especially around the Mediterranean. You can see evidence of this in South and Central Americas as well. I'm assuming the same would apply to the steppes of Asia.

Just my opinion.
 
Nice find for my blog:

http://principality-of-sealand.eu/pdf/sealandbrief0503e.pdf

Ever known that the Americans had build a replica of a quarter of Berlin in... Utah? The architect was the well-known German Jew Erich Mendelsohn.

Of course not. Purpose of that enterprise:

Despite succesful air raids that made seas of flames of German cities, frustration grew on the American side because they did not succeed to ignite a firestorm in the German Reich's capital.
Click to expand...

Can you imagine this? Americans building villages with the purpose of optimizing the number of people burned alive? After all this was 'the good war', remember?

Not difficult to imagine that this bunch of sadists, together with mass-raping Soviets, concocted a holocaust in Nuremberg.
 
aggle-rithm said:
It's impossible to know for sure, but before slavery became an out-of-control institution in Africa, it was every bit as culturally advanced as Europe.
Click to expand...

Slavery never was an 'institution' in Africa. The Europeans for 99% paid for blacks who had been captured by other blacks from neigboring tribes and who were subsequently transported, often on jewish owned ships, to America.

Tell me aggle-rithm: what is the African 'cultural advanced' equivalent of:

- Dresden
- Newton's Principia Mathematica
- Chartres Cathedral
- Sea-worthy sailing vessels
- St. Pauls Cathedral
- Rothenburg
- St. Peter Dom in Rome
- The Loire castles in France
- Venice, San Marco
etc., etc., etc.

Success.

P.S. I can only come up with the cultural achievement of the penis sheath. But hey, that's only me, the flaming Nazi gasbag.

P.S.2 for the occasional lurker: the lefty worldview basically is a sort of mental defiency which has to surpress all empirical data in order to uphold an egalitarian phantasy ideology, not unlike the Soviets once had. The Soviets had 'class struggle' as the focal point of their insane ideology with the consequence that all higher strata of society ('suppressors') were eradicated (read: killed). The society died as a long term consequence and these Soviet lefties are now on the scrap heap of history. Now we have American neo-bolsheviks who have developed a new egalitarian tyranical ideology based on the 'racism' idea. The new villains according to that ideology are the Whites (with the German as the absolute evil), the good guys all the others, or 'people of color', as some in the tea party movement like to put it. It won't take long until their brothers in arms, the cowboy lefties, will be in their graves as well with American society balkanized. 2020 max. Both society destroying egalitarian ideologies BTW came from the same origin, ask my antisemitism advisor dudalb for the details. The future belongs to 'racist societies' like China, Japan, Russia and maybe some European nations like Poland, Italy, Germany, Holland, Spain. Britain and France are dead.

P.S.3 We can be rather certain that aggle-rithm will quietly drop the subject. :D
 
Last edited:
Newton's Principia Mathematica
- Chartres Cathedral
- Sea-worthy sailing vessels
- St. Pauls Cathedral
- St. Peter Dom in Rome
- The Loire castles in France
Click to expand...

Strangely none of these are German, LOL

2 British - I guess he forgot he hates LOL anglos LOL
2 French
1 Italian
1 Pan European but a British strength

1
2
3
Every one laugh at him
 
Last edited:
How about the Pyramids and various Egyptian Cities and Temple complexes?
All the Carthaginian cities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom