Who started both World Wars?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, since you're not German, doesn't this mean you'll get smashed against the same wall?

No, why? Russia, France and Germany gave you the finger in 2003 and it paid out well for them. The geostrategic position of our beloved ally was severely weakened after the 3 trillion war. It was one big laugh. But we never showed it. We are friends, remember! Until we dump you, that is. In a convenient moment, for us.

Wouldn't it be better to join the winners, than wait to get smashed, since it's going to happen regardless of anything you do?

Certainly it is better to join the winners, question is: who is going to be the winner? You, don't make me laugh. You don't produce anythying people want. You have to extra in debt to the tune of 3 billion dollar a day. I think Russia will be more of a winner than you. Russia has no debt whatsoever, has nukes and resources and a huge appetit for our superior products. Match made in heaven. Bye bye!

Especially since all you do is whine on internet forums?

You know nothing about me. I am using this thread to convert it into a blog, as I have done before, and it will not be very flattering to you.
 
Last edited:
and it will not be very flattering to you.

What, are you going to do make us sound like you? L O L

Oh to make your intellect shine through make sure you put in that you were not aware that the term 'anglo' comes from the German tribes.......what a wildly funny mistake you've been making. That should be the centre point of your blog - don't you think?
 
Last edited:
Explain to us 9/11 why the Germans invaded neutral Luxembourg. Was Luxembourg going to invade Germany? Were the 'LOL anglos' LOL?
 
No, why? Russia, France and Germany gave you the finger in 2003 and it paid out well for them. The geostrategic position of our beloved ally was severely weakened after the 3 trillion war. It was one big laugh. But we never showed it. We are friends, remember! Until we dump you, that is. In a convenient moment, for us.
You're my friend? Really and truly?
Then you wouldn't dump me. I know you really love me. You said!

And when did these meanies give me the finger? When I wasn't looking? The cowards!


Certainly it is better to join the winners, question is: who is going to be the winner? You, don't make me laugh. You don't produce anythying people want. You have to extra in debt to the tune of 3 billion dollar a day. I think Russia will be more of a winner than you. Russia has no debt whatsoever, has nukes and resources and a huge appetit for our superior products. Match made in heaven. Bye bye!
But all that doesn't matter, since it's obvious the Jews control everything. So shouldn't we be joining them? Hmm, Mr. Know-it-all?



You know nothing about me. I am using this thread to convert it into a blog, as I have done before, and it will not be very flattering to you.
Well, so far, it's not too flattering to you, either, since you're getting stomped by people who are <ahem> inferior to you.

But I've always said, it's funny that White Supremacists think they're superior, since they can't show they actually are superior to anything more than pond scum. You'd think it would be easier for y'all to do that, yet you fail. Every stinkin' time.
 
I am using this thread for amusement you are just such a funny guy.
I think it is also important to treat it seriously though for the benefit of any Lurkers who might be swayed by your ramblings.
 
I am using this thread for amusement you are just such a funny guy.
I think it is also important to treat it seriously though for the benefit of any Lurkers who might be swayed by your ramblings.

Treat this seriously?

No freakin' way. There isn't anything in here worthy of treating with any kind of respect. All it deserves is the mocking it has coming.

I mean, really. The Jews started the World Wars? And you want to take it seriously?

As the great philosopher Bugs Bunny said, "It is to laugh!"
 
What, are you going to do make us sound like you? L O L

Hans is behaving like an Anglo sitcom with these canned laughter baked in. I find these laughters always helpfull since it indicates when the humor starts, which is seldom clear from the story line itself.

Oh to make your intellect shine through make sure you put in that you were not aware that the term 'anglo' comes from the German tribes.......what a wildly funny mistake you've been making. That should be the centre point of your blog - don't you think?

It is clear that Hans has no intention to engage in a serious discussion and tries to derail this thread with provocations.

On the ignore with him.
 
Ah, ignore.
The first refuge of the bigot.
That way, they don't have to listen to everyone laughing at them. It hurts their little feelings when no one takes them seriously.
 
Treat this seriously?

No freakin' way. There isn't anything in here worthy of treating with any kind of respect. All it deserves is the mocking it has coming.

I mean, really. The Jews started the World Wars? And you want to take it seriously?

As the great philosopher Bugs Bunny said, "It is to laugh!"

- Nobody says that 'the Jews' started WW1.

- Buchanan says that it was Britain who turned 2 European wars into 2 world wars.

- I am saying that it were the Jews who brought America into WW1 in return for the Palestine (Balfour declaration).

- According to Chamberlain it were the Jews who pushed Britain into WW2. Let's find out (later) if that is true.

And now you can go back reading your comics.
 
Last edited:
- Nobody says that 'the Jews' started WW1.

- Buchanan says that it was Britain who turned European wars into 2 world wars.

- I am saying that it were the Jews who brought America into WW1 in return for the Palestine (Balfour declaration).

- According to Chamberlain it were the Jews who pushed Britain into WW2. Let's find out (later) if that is true.

And now you can go back reading your comics.

My comics are your posts from now on. What could ever be more comical than that?
 
Ah, ignore.
The first refuge of the bigot.
That way, they don't have to listen to everyone laughing at them. It hurts their little feelings when no one takes them seriously.

I started this thread, remember?
I knew in advance that it would be me against the rest.
That's why I choose this forum in the first place.
I don't care about little stitches from fruit flies.

I have done it before, you see: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=128473

The upshot of that thread was the further finetuning of this blog: http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

So far 50,000 hits and counting since it was prominently linked on whatreallyhappened.com, iamthewitness.com and henrymakow.com

Very satisfying result indeed. That's multiplying. :D

What are you going to do about it?
 
Last edited:
My comics are your posts from now on. What could ever be more comical than that?

Excellent, I am happy for you. I really am.
You can even call me Nazi, if you like, all wonderful.

There is only one condition: every now and then you have to make a smart remark that is on topic and helpful to my cause.

Otherwise you will follow Hans to the ignore Hades sooner than you think.

Success.
 
Excellent, I am happy for you. I really am.
You can even call me Nazi, if you like, all wonderful.

There is only one condition: every now and then you have to make a smart remark that is on topic and helpful to my cause.

Otherwise you will follow Hans to the ignore Hades sooner than you think.

Success.

I should care, why?
I should help, why?

Ignore, don't ignore, makes no difference to me. I'll still make fun of you.

Mostly because it's so easy to do.
 
The upshot of that thread was the further finetuning of this blog: http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

So far 50,000 hits and counting since it was prominently linked on whatreallyhappened.com, iamthewitness.com and henrymakow.com

Very satisfying result indeed. That's multiplying. :D

What are you going to do about it?

Crazies linking to crazies, not really an accomplishment.
 
Last edited:
Crazies linking to crazies, not really an accomplishment.

Actually, it is. You see, being able to link is evidence of rudimentary motor skills and low-level cognitive function. The fact they can do it is an achievement of monumental proportion!
 
Oh no you're going to ignore me? Oh gosh. I'm deeply honoured. Now that means I get to answer the questions for you? LOL

Why did the Germans invade Luxembourg? It must have been some sort of evil Jewish trick. LOL

Why did the Germans have plans to invade neutral Switzerland? Was Switzerland and its ally Liechenstein going to launch a surprize assault? Where the LOL 'Anglos' LOL going to take over the Confederation of Helvetica and the Germans needed to forestall that?

Why oh why did 'peaceful' Germany attack Luxembourg and plan to attack Switzerland. Why cry the lurkers why?
 
Ah 9/11 your habit of lying and not answering MAKES this thread a joke. We are only responding in kind.

post non-historical nonsense as the 'truth' and guess what you'll be treated as being non-serious. It's your own fault dude.

I mean you are so completely incompetent at history I can almost see that you are really a Jewish fellow doing this to make such deniers look stupid. Are you Jewish?
 
This is exactly what I am looking for:

http://www.amazon.com/Forrestal-Diaries-James/dp/0670324183

Contains the quote mentioned earlier from the Chamberlain-Kennedy conversation.

Here is a confirmation from a seemingly independent angle:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War.pdf

If Mr. Forrestal's information regarding the impulses behind the recent war needed any confirmation, they have already had it from the outspoken statements of Mr. Oswald Pirow, former South African Defence Minister, who told the Associated Press on the 14th January, 1952, in Johannesburg that "Chamberlain had told him that he was under great pressure from World Jewry not to accommodate Hitler."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Forrestal
Was possibly murdered. That alone makes him interesting. Just like Patton.

Mind you, he was Secretary of Defense. It was him who was against using the atom bomb against Japan:

Forrestal's greatest legacy may have been an unrealized one. Forrestal, along with Secretary of War Henry Stimson and Under Secretary of State Joseph Grew, in the early months of 1945, strongly advocated a softer policy toward Japan that would permit a negotiated armistice, a 'face-saving' surrender. Forrestal's primary concern was not the resurgence of a militarized Japan, but rather "the menace of Russian Communism and its attraction for decimated, destabilized societies in Europe and Asia," and, therefore, keeping the Soviet Union out of the war with Japan. Had his advice been followed, Japan might well have surrendered before August 1945, precluding the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.[17] So strongly did he feel about this matter that he cultivated negotiation efforts that some regarded as approaching insubordination.

Hmm, sort of a George Kennan type or Paul Craig Roberts. Types from the past. Now we have only the war mongers left who don't have trouble invading a country on a pretext and making fun about it afterwards (1 million people killed as a result of it).
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom