• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

What's wrong with this definition of God: maker of heaven and earth and everything?

yrreg said:
For atheists who want to bring in masturbation in their posts.


That is a shocker, your only contribution?

Typical.


As some atheist from being erstwhile Christian confessed that he became an atheist for cognitive consistency and guiltless masturbation.

But now he seems to insist that he was being funny.

More like into a shocker.

Or he should ask himself which is funny and which is a shocker.

Typical.

I can see some strain of exhibitionism there, with impunity in the net of course.

Yrreg
Click to expand...

Interpreter! Stat!
 
yrreg said:
For atheists who want to bring in masturbation in their posts.


That is a shocker, your only contribution?

Typical.


As some atheist from being erstwhile Christian confessed that he became an atheist for cognitive consistency and guiltless masturbation.

But now he seems to insist that he was being funny.

More like into a shocker.

Or he should ask himself which is funny and which is a shocker.

Typical.


I can see some strain of exhibitionism there, with impunity in the net of course.




Yrreg
Click to expand...

Uhh, that made no sense. And I prefer to call it "beating off."
 
Last edited:
He's the only one who can talk about his penis without it being a sign of exhibitionism within the impunity of the net.

As far as:
Okay, you tell me then, atheists, what concept of God you are denying existence to.
Click to expand...
Is there more than one concept? Is there some reason that god-believers don't agree on a single concept of god? Maybe you guys could agree on one concept and then it will be more clear which one the atheists are "denying." Barring that, I deny any and all of them, as all the god beliefs of which I am aware are human constructs, designed to answer the tough questions and gain control over others.
 
John Jones said:
What kinds have you got?
Click to expand...

Oh, I got one. How about Mbombo of Bakuba mythology? He created the world and universe from vomiting. He showed early man how to make fire too.

If the whole puking up the universe thing is too gross for you, we could go with Kamui from Ainu mythology. He built the world on the back of a trout.
 
Last edited:
bozman said:
Oh, I got one. How about Mbombo of Bakuba mythology? He created the world and universe from vomiting. He showed early man how to make fire too.

If the whole puking up the universe thing is too gross for you, we could go with Kamui from Ainu mythology. He built the world on the back of a trout.
Click to expand...

I hearby deny to them existence . My denial is final.
 
John Jones said:
What kinds have you got?
Click to expand...


All kinds.

Given how flexible yrreg is with his definition of god (which is, at best, uselessly vague), you have a veritable god buffet set before you.



For my part: I deny all the gods conceived of throughout history that you deny, yrreg. Plus one more.
 
John Jones said:
I hearby deny to them existence . My denial is final.
Click to expand...

Hmmm... so you're an atheist when it comes to them, eh? Interesting. And what's wrong with the trout story? Unlike talking snakes and trees of good and evil, I've actually seen trout.
 
Last edited:
yrreg said:
For atheists who want to bring in masturbation in their posts.
That is a shocker, your only contribution?
Typical.
As some atheist from being erstwhile Christian confessed that he became an atheist for cognitive consistency and guiltless masturbation.
But now he seems to insist that he was being funny.
More like into a shocker.
Or he should ask himself which is funny and which is a shocker.
Typical.
I can see some strain of exhibitionism there, with impunity in the net of course.
Yrreg
Click to expand...
Olowkow said:
Interpreter! Stat!
Click to expand...

"Those of you who have spoken about masturbation are trying to derail this thread. I can't say I'm shocked that this is your only contribution to the conversation. I remember someone saying he had converted from Christianity to atheism so he could masturbate without guilt. He says he was just being funny, but I think he was trying to shock people and, subconsciously, himself. You who mock me with masturbation jokes are sick, and the internet gives you the anonymity you need to fully express your deviance."

Of course, that's just the translation of what Gerry *said*. Here's the translation of what he meant:

"I am the only person intelligent and moral enough to carry on a serious conversation about philosophy. The very fact that you mock me is proof that you are perverted, lost from God, and, most importantly, dumber than me."

The recent uptick in Gerry threads leads me to believe that he has recently suffered a blow to his ego in real life. For several months, he was able to feel sufficiently superior to others without coming here. Something has changed. Losing an election to be church treasurer would be enough to do it. But, then, I've been watching a lot of "Criminal Minds" and I've started to profile everybody.


I correctly identified my supermarket checkout girl as an arsonist. She hadn't started any fires yet, but she probably will. Yeah, I'm almost sure she will.
 
yrreg said:
For atheists who want to bring in masturbation in their posts.

That is a shocker, your only contribution?
Click to expand...


I honestly can't think of anything more interesting to discuss with you, and you are one of the last people on the planet that I'd like to discuss sex with.

He's merely trying to adapt his argument to you, his intended audience. I think he's done a good job of taking your interests and capabilities into account.

You are the guy who spent many posts talking about penises, aren't you?
 
Since when is masturbation something we're not supposed to talk about? What are you, a Mormon?
 
I slowly get the feeling that the only reason Yrreg continue to accuse other of fears, is because he is so unsecure in his faith and he projects his own feeling to others.

He is not trying to convince *US* he is trying to convince *HIMSELF*.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom