Cavemonster
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 6,701
As ever I would say follow the money - there has never been any sign since the disaster happened that something has been delayed because BP was slow or reluctant to pay for it.
Frankly, this would be hard to know without actually being inside the confidential meetings being held there. This is a one of a kind disaster, so from the outside, it's impossible to know if possible solutions are being shot down or delayed because of reluctance to pay. The reason so much money is flowing out of BP is that the early attempts to stop the flow did not work. I don't attribute any nobility to it. They are dead as a company until they stop the oil from flowing out.
What we do know, from memos, is that of the 11 people killed in the blast, some of them may likely have survived if BP had bought the stronger shelters specifically designed to protect against such a blast, which they specifically declined to buy, instead opting for the cheapest shelters.
So we have a documentation of them putting profit above human lives in a gamble and losing those lives. I am less apt to give them the benefit of the doubt in their other actions.