Who started both World Wars?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Zionists hate Buchanan but are not powerful enough to silence him like they could with Helen Thomas.

The Zionists supposedly control the banks, business, and government to an extent that they could start two world wars 80 years ago, but they can't silence one guy? Either you're full of it or he's Rambo.
 
The Zionists supposedly control the banks, business, and government to an extent that they could start two world wars 80 years ago, but they can't silence one guy? Either you're full of it or he's Rambo.

It's like NASA can stage and cover up the hoaxed moon landings for all these years but can't stop Jarah White and his ilk from exposing the truth on Youtube
 
The Zionists supposedly control the banks, business, and government to an extent that they could start two world wars 80 years ago, but they can't silence one guy? Either you're full of it or he's Rambo.

So far I have stated that the Zionists brought America into WW1, just like they brought America in Iraq. Not that difficult.

If you have the conviction that the Zionists additionally started WW1 and WW2, then please let us know. Would be a nice-to-have for my proganda blog. So far I am not convinced.
 
Last edited:
Wrong, wrong, wrong... those 130.000 people didn't die. They just moved elsewhere. Much like you claim the Jews did.

I was about to bring up that angle myself.

I am sure that all these missing inhabitants of Dresden moved to Israel, Canada, the US and Argentina immediately after they had escaped the burning city and their cloths were still burning. Amazing.

Amazer pretends no to understand the difference between:

- Group of people located on one location like Amsterdam and then deported to the east. Even today their are still ca. 1 million holocaust survivors in the... US. I still can remember many names of children from my primary school. I have no idea where they are. They are missing. They must be dead, right?
- People reported missing after a city was bombed
 
So the Zionists had enough pull to bring a country into a world war 90 years ago, but can't silence one guy in 2010. This Buchanan guy is one tough cookie. Superman perhaps?

Helen Thomas an old diehard was fired immediately after she said something about Israel. Buchanan stays clear from the Jews and the H-word. He just criticizes the actions of the British government, basically a bunch of goys, during WW1 and WW2. No direct threat for the Jews.

Do you want to deny that the Zionists brought America into Iraq (on a pretext)? So why would it be impossible that they did a similar thing many many years ago?
 
- Group of people located on one location like Amsterdam and then deported to the east. Even today their are still ca. 1 million holocaust survivors in the... US. I still can remember many names of children from my primary school. I have no idea where they are. They are missing. They must be dead, right?
- People reported missing after a city was bombed

My (jewish) uncle together with his immediate family escaped from Amsterdam in April 1940. When he got back there after the war was over his wider family (uncles, aunts, cousins & 92 year old grandmother) had 'vanished'. He never saw them again. Where did they go 'Herr' 9/11 Investigator?
 
Helen Thomas an old diehard was fired immediately after she said something about Israel. Buchanan stays clear from the Jews and the H-word. He just criticizes the actions of the British government, basically a bunch of goys, during WW1 and WW2. No direct threat for the Jews.

But he's on the verge of uncovering the super-secret Jew council that controls most of the world. Surely they want to prevent that? After Buchanan, don't you think they'd come after you? You're so close to the truth!
 
But he's on the verge of uncovering the super-secret Jew council that controls most of the world. Surely they want to prevent that? After Buchanan, don't you think they'd come after you? You're so close to the truth!

Don't worry. The mere presence of the Aryan master race can reduce a Jew to ash.
 
It's funny how this all powerful Zionist Cabal can't stop the likes of 9/11-investigator from posting all this crap.
 
I was about to bring up that angle myself.

I am sure that all these missing inhabitants of Dresden moved to Israel, Canada, the US and Argentina immediately after they had escaped the burning city and their cloths were still burning. Amazing.

Amazer pretends no to understand the difference between:

- Group of people located on one location like Amsterdam and then deported to the east. Even today their are still ca. 1 million holocaust survivors in the... US. I still can remember many names of children from my primary school. I have no idea where they are. They are missing. They must be dead, right?
- People reported missing after a city was bombed

That's just Nazi propaganda. Dresden was never destroyed by a bombing raid. Do you have pictures of the bombs falling ? No. If you do, they're fake.

There. That's just as "skeptical" as your view on the Holocaust.
 
My (jewish) uncle together with his immediate family escaped from Amsterdam in April 1940. When he got back there after the war was over his wider family (uncles, aunts, cousins & 92 year old grandmother) had 'vanished'. He never saw them again. Where did they go 'Herr' 9/11 Investigator?

It's a big world out there, gtm.

I have told the story several times, here I go again: the Red Cross has a tracing service with the aim of bringing family memebers together again after they have lost track of each other in (civil) war situtations. Everywhere in the world where there are war zones ICRC employees are available to interview these people, with sophisticated software aimed at finding people back. Result: only a minute fraction of these displaced persons ever find their relatives back, less then 1%. That's 2010. How much worse was the situation in 1945?
 
Last edited:
It's a big world out there, gtm.

People generally don't leave families, careers, businesses, property etc on a whim. It beggars belief that the 1000's of Jews who lived in Amsterdam prior to the war as a collective class decided to clear off without even leaving a forwarding address. The dreadful truth is they were deported & murdered.
 
Last edited:
No the British element of that raid was trying to create a fire storm. Having the second wave go in when it did was to specifically disrupt fire fighting efforts.


That was standard area bombing procedure. The idea was to cause the most amount of damage to the largest possible area. Bomber Command had been doing the exact same thing to many German cities well before Dresden (including throwing everything it could at Berlin in the winter of 1943/44) as well as afterwards. But Bomber Command could not create firestorms at will, however much it tried. They were fluke, unpredictable events. The fact that no more than perhaps a dozen were created in the entire war in spite of the hundreds of bombing raids conducted speaks to the rarity.


It is easy to say the bomb loadout was nothing special compared to other raids. It is how they were delivered that proves the intent


Except that was precisely how the RAF had been bombing German cities for many months. The only difference was the the results at Dresden were far more severe than normal. On the night of Feb. 13/14, 796 bombers were sent to attack Dresden (while another 368 attacked a synthetic oil plant near Leipzig). The night after the Dresden raid, 688 bombers were dispatched to attack Chemnitz. But no one talks about this raid because the bombing did not produce the extraordinary results of the previous night.

It is only because the Dresden raid was unusual and exceptional in its results that it becomes the subject of discussion.
 
Bomber Command was bombing with up to 1000 bombers almost every night. Dresden wasn't special to them at all.
 
1) Alsace-Lorraine was a territory created by the German Empire in 1871 after the annexation of most of Alsace and the Moselle region of Lorraine in the Franco-Prussian War.

2) It was once held by Lious the "Bavarian" (who was actually a Frank ) during the Holy Roman Empire. (Please note that Germany didn't exist yet but rather separate states.)

3) Yes it has German dialects along the Rhine. Languages spread by commerce and not lines on maps. Alemannic german dialects are spoken in Alcase because the Alamanni Gauls who fought Rome from this area spoke a type of German. The rest of France ended up speaking Latin. Does that make french people Romans?


That the Alsatians and the Lorrainers considered themselves Frenchman who happened to speak a dialect of German in 1870,and were not happy about the annexation is, of course, ignored by 9/11 Investigator.
The annexatation was a disaster for Germany. Bismarck was right in having very grave doubts about it. It ensured that relations between France and Germany would be poisoned.
It is interesting the when Austria could have taken Alsace and Lorraine in 1814,(and they had much stronger claims to it then The Second Reich did) they did not,seeing the trouble it would cause.
 
1) Alsace-Lorraine was a territory created by the German Empire in 1871 after the annexation of most of Alsace and the Moselle region of Lorraine in the Franco-Prussian War.

2) It was once held by Lious the "Bavarian" (who was actually a Frank ) during the Holy Roman Empire. (Please note that Germany didn't exist yet but rather separate states.)

3) Yes it has German dialects along the Rhine. Languages spread by commerce and not lines on maps. Alemannic german dialects are spoken in Alcase because the Alamanni Gauls who fought Rome from this area spoke a type of German. The rest of France ended up speaking Latin. Does that make french people Romans?


That the Alsatians and the Lorrainers considered themselves Frenchman who happened to speak a dialect of German in 1870,and were not happy about the annexation is, of course, ignored by 9/11 Investigator.
The annexatation was a disaster for Germany. Bismarck was right in having very grave doubts about it. It ensured that relations between France and Germany would be poisoned.
It is interesting the when Austria could have taken Alsace and Lorraine in 1814,(and they had much stronger claims to it then The Second Reich did) they did not,seeing the trouble it would cause.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom