• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Truthers: Was it caused by a missile/explosives?

Carlos

Critical Thinker
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
285
How is it possible?

pentagonwall.jpg
 
Perhaps not, Bill. But you don't seem to be all there either. ;)

between the 'heres' and the 'theres' I hardly kmow whether I'm coming or going Fitz.

So was it a missile or a plane then ?

Suppose it was a plane, say a 757 but there were explosives built in to destroy any large parts on impact ?
 
Last edited:
Shock shock. Duh! :rolleyes:

I just saw this...

It is supposed to read supersonic shock.

:eusa_doh:

Eta: What Carlos is hinting at is the damage outside the entry hole and why this damage is going inward.
 
Last edited:
The crushed parts of the facade are utterly inconsistant with the use of an explosive charge of any kind. Look at the exposed steel column on the second floor. The top of it is pushed toward the entry hole. This can only be achieved by the impact of a solid object from the right.

Now, to those idiots who say that there are no wing prints, I must say that they are lying or just plain stupid.

(Or, in Stubblebine's case, senile.)
 
Eta: What Carlos is hinting at is the damage outside the entry hole and why this damage is going inward.

Hate to burst Carlos' bubble (actually, I'm not), but that is part of the entry hole. The plane did, after all, have wings.

And of course, damage at that location is in no way compatible with a missile strike at the fuselage impact location. So, like, is he now hypothesizing more than one cruise missile struck the Pentagon? :boggled:
 

Back
Top Bottom