• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Are Holder and Obama racists? / DOJ dismisses Black Panther case

Says the poster who for all intents and purposes called Bartle Bull a liar.

Bull shot himself in the foot when he was taped whining about ACORN. He's gone over to the dark side.

And I asked you whether you'd find three Ku Klux Klan members in their uniforms, with nightsticks (or even without), standing in front of a polling place, menacing.

I assume, then, that you would be cool with rounding up and disarming all the unofficial militias.
 
There is also a link in another thread to a video of him babbling about ACORN as though they were evil incarnate.

Yes, lefty, we know you think ACORN is a fine, respectable organization that can do no wrong. :rolleyes:

Get your facts straight. ONE of them was and he is a known nut job.

My facts were right. I said, A nightstick.

But you are right in calling the man a nut. But if he's known to be one, why is he still a member in good standing of the New Black Party? And just to show how big a menace this man and this organization potentially are to society, check out what Shabazz, the new head of the NBP, said recently about King Samir and what he says the NBP stands for:

http://videos.mediaite.com/video/New-Black-Panther-Chairman-Mali

King Samir talked of killing crackers and "white babies". And Shabazz seemed very hesitant to go on record whether he condoned killing "white babies" and most certainly implied that his organization might approve of killing cops. Why is the Obama administration going out of it's way to protect these two and the NBP?

Quote:
Now why would they not contest the charges unless they felt they had another way of getting off? Which suggests we probe whether these defendants or anyone representing them had behind the scenes contacts with any members of the Obama administration.

Totally speculative and inadmissible.

Says lefty the lawyer. :rolleyes:
 
Before a penny is thrownm down the rat hole trying to get a felony conviction agaisnt an obviously mentally ill person

This mentally ill person was standing in front of a polling place in paramilitary garb threatening people and carrying a nightstick.
 
This mentally ill person was standing in front of a polling place in paramilitary garb threatening people and carrying a nightstick.

It's not like he was part of some vast Democratic Party conspiracy to overthrow the Constitution.

It was a case of a nutjob acting out.
 
This mentally ill person was standing in front of a polling place in paramilitary garb threatening people and carrying a nightstick.

In fact, he was so threatening, that people are entering and leaving the polling place freely and standing around talking on the phone behind him. And did you see the frightening way they left when the cops asked them to?
 
But you didn't respond.
No you didn't respond.
This is in no way a logical response to my statement.

Why is equivalent treatment under the law considered "payback"?

Why this case?
Why now?

Actually, don't bother answering. We already know.

Here's your response of why you didn't complain when minutemen were not charged.
I'm not here to advocate for your politics, joobz.

partisan politics gussied up as a demand for justice.
 
I'm trying to imagine a world where the prosecutors can't drop charges and every complaint and accusation has to result in a trial.......it would not be pretty.
 
In fact, he was so threatening, that people are entering and leaving the polling place freely and standing around talking on the phone behind him. And did you see the frightening way they left when the cops asked them to?

I wonder why the guy tried to conceal the nightstick when the cops arrived on the scene? After all, he said he was "security" for the polling station. Did he think he was doing something illegal?

I wonder how the cops got the idea that these two guys were trying to "stop people from voting?"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFOKnJ0oXYY&feature=related
 
I wonder why the guy tried to conceal the nightstick when the cops arrived on the scene? After all, he said he was "security" for the polling station. Did he think he was doing something illegal?
Good point. The guy's a jerk and likely knew he went over the line. It's probably another reason why the indictment on him wasn't dropped.

Of course, he willingly left at the officer's request so....

I wonder how the cops got the idea that these two guys were trying to "stop people from voting?"
People called in. If I call the police to say that my neighbor's are peeing on my lawn, they will show up, regardless if my complaint is true or not.
The Police's job is to maintain peace. The actual conviction and deciding if wrong doing was going on is up to the courts.
 
that link doesn't contradict Unabogie's statement.

Joobz, education is great and valuable except when it's the education of a liberal elitist. Then it's nothing but an ivory tower. Or worse. Like Barack Obama. Who's educated, but none of it means anything because the guy can't even speak without reading off a teleprompter. Or a climate scientist, who only uses his status as a "professor" in order to lie about things for monetary gain and can't even write software.

But when a Teabagger went past high school, it's a sign of great intelligence, notwithstanding his penchant for watching Glen Beck (and taking him seriously) , or his belief that his taxes went up and Barack Obama is a secret Muslim Kenyan Socialist Usurper and over-priced gold is a wise investment.
 
People called in. If I call the police to say that my neighbor's are peeing on my lawn, they will show up, regardless if my complaint is true or not.
The Police's job is to maintain peace. The actual conviction and deciding if wrong doing was going on is up to the courts.

Does nobody else find it odd that there is video of some rightwhacker standing out in front of the polling place shrieking about being intimidated by the big scary black man, but no video of the black man actually intimidating anyone? This was a Repuiblican activist on camera. The were looking for ways to manufacture outrage all year.

It doesn't smell right.
 
They had the money to go to college. Maybe even to a prestigious college. That doesn't mean they are bright. I can think of at least a few drooling morons who managed to attend Ivy League universities, even get elected to high government office, who never spent a day in the same room with an objective fact.


Wow! I never thought I'd see you run down POTUS Obama like that. Don't you think you are being overly harsh?
 
This is so silly. It reminds of of when Rush Limbaugh tried to blame Obama because some black kids beat up a white kid in a school bus.
 
Good point. The guy's a jerk and likely knew he went over the line. It's probably another reason why the indictment on him wasn't dropped.

Of course, he willingly left at the officer's request so....

Well, the cops have side arms; he only had a nightstick. Not to mention both of them knew they were being recorded on video. But why would they resist? They already got the exposure they wanted.


People called in. If I call the police to say that my neighbor's are peeing on my lawn, they will show up, regardless if my complaint is true or not.
The Police's job is to maintain peace. The actual conviction and deciding if wrong doing was going on is up to the courts.

Of course they will show up, but they wouldn't go over to your neighbor and say, "You can't pee on his lawn" just because you made a complaint. I imagine they would say your neighbor complained about you peeing on his lawn, unless they actually saw your neighbor, member in hand.
 
Well, the cops have side arms; he only had a nightstick. Not to mention both of them knew they were being recorded on video. But why would they resist? They already got the exposure they wanted.
I agree. Publicity is what they wanted it and conservative news outlets are giving it to them.



Of course they will show up, but they wouldn't go over to your neighbor and say, "You can't pee on his lawn" just because you made a complaint. I imagine they would say your neighbor complained about you peeing on his lawn, unless they actually saw your neighbor, member in hand.
But they will ask my neighbor to leave the property as a measure to keep the peace.
 

Back
Top Bottom