• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

"No Planes" Theory is whitewash!

9/11 Chewy Defense

Banned
9
Joined
Jul 14, 2007
Messages
3,593
Truthers who think that there weren't planes on 9/11 are greatly mistaken. Thousands of people who witnessed the planes impact the WTCs' & the Pentagon are on record with the 9/11 Commission findings & evidence of the planes was recorded & documented.

Despite repeated attempts to tell the Truthers that there were indeed planes on 9/11 go in one ear & out the other. Although the Truthers do show pictures & videos of the planes flying towards the WTCs', they totally turn a blind eye to what the picture/video does tell. Their sheer ignorance to the people that died on 9/11 is their ultimate downfall of their cause.

Here's a link for the "No Planers" to follow:
http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/review.html
 
I wonder; are there any truthers who are not no-planers? Granted, even if they do accept that there were planes at NY, don't most of them deny planes at the Pentagon and Shanksville?
 
TheRedWorm said:
I wonder; are there any truthers who are not no-planers? Granted, even if they do accept that there were planes at NY, don't most of them deny planes at the Pentagon and Shanksville?
Click to expand...

There are many truthers who are not no planers.
 
Edx said:
There are many truthers who are not no planers.
Click to expand...

For all four crash sites? The only reason that I ask is that many of them seem to focus on one area, and tend not to comment much on the others. Plus, I've only ever met two truthers in real life, and one of them (my brother) I turned around PDQ.
 
TheRedWorm said:
For all four crash sites? The only reason that I ask is that many of them seem to focus on one area, and tend not to comment much on the others. Plus, I've only ever met two truthers in real life, and one of them (my brother) I turned around PDQ.
Click to expand...

Well I'll give you some examples:

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagontrap.html
http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
http://www.truthmove.org/content/flight-77-the-pentagon/
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/attack/flight93.html
 
Last edited:
Edx said:
Well I'll give you some examples:

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagontrap.html
Click to expand...

Ah, good old Jim Hoffman. He believes, and has stated a couple of variants of the theory, that although Flight 77 really did hit the Pentagon, the crash was deliberately engineered so as not to look like a Boeing 757 crash from the evidence available after the fact. He thinks this was done either by planting charges on the airliner so that the tail was blown to pieces after the nose struck the Pentagon facade, or by firing a precisely-timed missile from the nonexistent Thunderbirds-style hidden missile batteries concealed under the lawn. Thus he explains away the conspiracy theorists' own incompetence at interpreting evidence as just another part of the conspiracy.

You don't need to be a no-planer to be utterly nuts.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
Ah, good old Jim Hoffman. He believes, and has stated a couple of variants of the theory, that although Flight 77 really did hit the Pentagon, the crash was deliberately engineered so as not to look like a Boeing 757 crash from the evidence available after the fact. He thinks this was done either by planting charges on the airliner so that the tail was blown to pieces after the nose struck the Pentagon facade, or by firing a precisely-timed missile from the nonexistent Thunderbirds-style hidden missile batteries concealed under the lawn. Thus he explains away the conspiracy theorists' own incompetence at interpreting evidence as just another part of the conspiracy.

You don't need to be a no-planer to be utterly nuts.

Dave
Click to expand...

Oh certainly. He also thinks U93 was shot down and that the Pentagon had a defence shield that could have shot down F77.

Its funny because he has also debunked the "no hijackers on flight manifests" claim, but then states at the end that many of the hiajckers are still alive :eye-poppi LOL.

Oil Empire is probably the most rational out of all truthers Ive seen, they even argue against demolitions. Of course they somehow believe that these claims they debunk arent just wrong they're intentional disinfo created by the government! hahaha
 
Last edited:
DavidJames said:
Another example of the 9/11 CT forum being kept alive by those who don't believe in them. Pretty sad.
Click to expand...

yup. I was watching the traffic in the forum during the one week hiatus, and it was minimal at best.

click out of this forum, and for the most part, 9/11 truth goes away.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
yup. I was watching the traffic in the forum during the one week hiatus, and it was minimal at best.
TAM:)
Click to expand...

Not all of us can hit 18,562 posts, in under 4 years, while being a doctor, who must hate Golf! Just barely under 4, but...
:D:):D:):D
 
you...you....lol

check my posting numbers for the last year, and you will realize (sadly) that most of those 18,000 posts are from 2006 to early 2009.

TAM:D
 
The reason I choose the term "whitewash" is because every No-Plane Truther is like Tom Sawyer. Everyone knows part of the story where young Tom is painting his aunts fence with whitewash because he played hooky from school. Then he spots some friends & cons them into painting the fence for a marble.

No-Planers persuade gullible people into thinking that there were "no-planes" on 9/11 & cons the people into thinking that they're "brilliant" for finding a "hole" in the 9/11 Commission Report.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom