• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed All 43 videos "Second Hit"" [Explosion]at WTC 2: Plane or No Plane?

Status
Not open for further replies.
dtugg said:
The NWO has superhuman powers but is incompetent at the same time. They were somehow able to fake a bunch of videos, some of them live, implant the image in the brains of eyewitnesses, create plane shaped holes in the towers, plant fake plane wreckage, fake the radar tracks, fake phone calls, disappear the real planes and passengers, ect. But they forgot to add the fake plane noises. And if it weren't for jammy, they would have got away with it too.
Click to expand...

Achilles rulez!!!;)
 
dafydd said:
I'll hold you to that. I have tried to stop responding to Jammy, but it has become an addiction. I need my daily dose of lunacy.
Click to expand...

no..its a compulsion.

watch as I stop talking to him about No-Planes topics.

:)
 
Last edited:
Notice the low rumble on this tape beginning at about the 0:24 mark. I seem to have noticed that on some other tapes too.
Anyway- why doesn't the cameraman react at all when the noise of the second jet filled the air ? It almost looked as if he didn't ven hear it- or his brother either if it comes to that. I wonder why he doesn't say something like 'Do you hear that jet aircraft coming Jules ?'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUT7yup-YIg&NR=1 Naudet 2
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Notice the low rumble on this tape beginning at about the 0:24 mark. I seem to have noticed that on some other tapes too.
Anyway- why doesn't the cameraman react at all when the noise of the second jet filled the air ? It almost looked as if he didn't ven hear it- or his brother either if it comes to that. I wonder why he doesn't say something like 'Do you hear that jet aircraft coming Jules?http://
Click to expand...

isn't it obvious?

the Naudet brothers were hired by the NWO to document the entire event, so that Robert DeNiro could make a cool one hour special about 9-11, and then conveniently start the yearly TriBeca Film Festival.

and isn't Naudet, a Jewish name?
 
Bill, frankly only a moron could look at all those videos, and the still images, and the eye witness accounts and still not be sure a plane hit the buildings.

I'm just saying.
 
twinstead said:
Bill, frankly only a moron could look at all those videos, and the still images, and the eye witness accounts and still not be sure a plane hit the buildings.

I'm just saying.
Click to expand...

Hi Twinstead. I personally opt for real planes just because I happen to believe that no-planes would be too complicated.

But on the other hand I do believe that reams of evidence was deliberately laid to suggest that there were no planes. A piece of the Psy-op in my opinion. A ruse to split opinion and a distraction
 
bill smith said:
Hi Twinstead. I personally opt for real planes just because I happen to believe that no-planes would be too complicated.

But on the other hand I do believe that reams of evidence was deliberately laid to suggest that there were no planes. A piece of the Psy-op in my opinion. A ruse to split opinion and a distraction
Click to expand...

Split who's opinion? The dis-info agents'? Who was distracted?

Bill, your making even less sense since your return.
 
bill smith said:
Hi Twinstead. I personally opt for real planes just because I happen to believe that no-planes would be too complicated.

But on the other hand I do believe that reams of evidence was deliberately laid to suggest that there were no planes. A piece of the Psy-op in my opinion. A ruse to split opinion and a distraction
Click to expand...

What is this I don't even
 
DGM said:
Split who's opinion? The dis-info agents'? Who was distracted?

Bill, your making even less sense since your return.
Click to expand...

Well when one crowd is shouting 'planes' and the other crowd is shouting 'no-planes' as happened in the Truth Movement- that could be called splitting opinion.

And when you have such diametrically opposed views the last thing anyone thinks about is whether it might have been a real plane and the points of entry into the buildings had been specially prepared. In that case it could be called a distraction.
 
The problem is the "truth" movement originates all the dis-info that is supposed to divide them. The "movement" is a case study in ADD. If your claiming they're self defeating, then I can agree.
 
bill smith said:
Hi Twinstead. I personally opt for real planes just because I happen to believe that no-planes would be too complicated.

But on the other hand I do believe that reams of evidence was deliberately laid to suggest that there were no planes. A piece of the Psy-op in my opinion. A ruse to split opinion and a distraction
Click to expand...


There are Truthers who refuse to believe the WTC no-planers are legit-They think they are doing disinformation, trying to paint all truthers as being nuts- They would think Jammy is a troll- who knows full well planes hit the WTC, He's just acting like a mental patient.
Alex Jones thinks WTC No planers are real, but thinks they are nuts.

The odd thing is that ALL Truthers are No-planers- I have yet to meet the Truther that was willing to admit that a plane hit the Pentagon and one crashed in Shanskville. Most Truthers concede that planes crashed in NY, but don't think planes crashed in PA or Washington.

It's always amusing when one Truther faction is at war with another.....

A favorite chesnut are the the Truthers who dismiss the WTC No-Planers as being absurd, but they go on to add what REALLY happened was that the planes were being flown by remote contol......

um....
 
Last edited:
Titanic Explorer said:
There are Truthers who refuse to believe the WTC no-planers are legit-They think they are doing disinformation, trying to paint all truthers as being nuts- They would think Jammy is a troll- who knows full well planes hit the WTC, He's just acting like a mental patient.
Alex Jones thinks WTC No planers are real, but thinks they are nuts.

The odd thing is that ALL Truthers are No-planers- I have yet to meet the Truther that was willing to admit that a plane hit the Pentagon and one crashed in Shanskville. Most agree planes crashed in NY, but don't think planes crashed in PA or Washington
Click to expand...

I don't really do the Pentagon myself. It smells too much like a honeypot to attract conspiracy theories.

I occasionally argue it but more for fun than anything else.

One other thing....Not all Truthers are really Truthers in case you didn't know.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I don't really do the Pentagon myself. It smells to much like a honeypot to attract conspiracy theories.

I occasionally argue it but more for fun than anything else.

One other thing....Not all Truthers are really Truthers in case you didn't know.
Click to expand...

Interesting take. An old twoofer D'oh P. thought the exact same thing.
You don't happen to think WTC 7 was brought down, to aid rescue operations, by chance...do you? ;)

Maybe not, but damn curious!
 
Last edited:
Well jammonius, being a "lurker" that has read all 52 pages of your well argued evidence for no planes, I thought it was about time I posted to show you some support!

Nah only kidding, I vote Plane.
 
bill smith said:
Hi Twinstead. I personally opt for real planes just because I happen to believe that no-planes would be too complicated.

But on the other hand I do believe that reams of evidence was deliberately laid to suggest that there were no planes. A piece of the Psy-op in my opinion. A ruse to split opinion and a distraction
Click to expand...


Yes, because if I was ever going to commit the sort of murder that would get me life in prison (that is if the jury was feeling charitable and compassionate) by say, shooting someone with a speargun, I'd want to carry it out in such a way as to simultaneously fool all of the experts in the fields of weapons, forensics, etc. while at the same time totally tipping my hand to a relative handful of armchair detectives who posess no knowledge (let alone expertise) in any of the relevant fields whatsoever. Then, just to be extra diabolically clever I'd simultaneously inflict a second fatal injury (maybe poison the victim) in such a way as to remove any doubt in the minds of the armchair detectives that I alone am the guilty party. That way they would argue amongst themselves over whether it was the spear or the poison that killed the victim. In fact they'd be so wrapped up in this disagreement, accusing each other of disinfo that they'd forget to take their respective "slam dunk" cases to the press or law enforcement officials. All the while I'd be hoping against hope that I orchestrated everything so perfectly that not one of the highly trained, intelligent and experienced actual experts would catch on to what I was doing despite all the howlingly obvious clues I deliberately (you know, Psyops...for kids!) left behind just to mess with people.

Yessiree, that's how I would commit a crime that if I was discovered I'd be sure to get locked up for life if not executed and be remembered as one of the most depicable villains in my country's history. That plan isn't "too complicated" at all:boggled:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom