• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed All 43 videos "Second Hit"" [Explosion]at WTC 2: Plane or No Plane?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I still REALLY want to know if Jamm has ever been to NYC, and has ever been on a NYC Subway.
 
You are engaging in misrepresentation. It matters not what I say is in the photo. Clearly, however, what is seen is a twisted piece of junk that could be anything and could come from anywhere. In order to be valid, reliable evidence, we need a claim to be properly made as to what the photo shows, who took it and who made the examination as to what is in it and how was it identified, among other easily discerned criteria for making a valid claim about what is shown in one or more photos.

As I said, do not allow yourself to be taken in by websites with an agenda that engage in wanton, blatant and stupid propaganda.

If that landing gear was not from one of the planes, then where inside the WTC did they keep a spare set of aircraft landing gear?
Get real!
 
untitled.jpg


Jamm- the New York Police Department has indentified this picture as a wheel from the plane that imbedded into an exterior pannel from WTC 1.

are you now calling the NYPD, liars?
 
Yes, yes he is.

Everyone is a liar. He is the only one who sees...

Wouldn't surprise me.Truthers have nothing but contempt for the heroic FDNY, often accusing them of having planted demolitions in the buildings.
I'm sure their scorn is the same with the NYPD.

Odd, the Truthers despise everyone except the 19 hijackers...
 
Any New Yorkers here? I'm a Bostonian, so I won't see the many errors Jam is no doubt making about the NYC subway...
 
As I said, do not allow yourself to be taken in by websitesJammonius with an agenda that engage(s) in wanton, blatant and stupid propaganda.
Not to mention a few lies scattered here and there.
 
Jamm- are you calling the NYPD liars? they posted a picture of landing gear embedded into a chunk of the exterior of WTC 1.
 
Your query is FUBAR and is a blatant misrepresentation. You have not established what the NYPD has said, let alone where they done so, Thunder.

Please do better.

I have already told you this is ground that has already been gone over. The NIST report describes the information about the perimeter beam with wheely in only the most generic and tentative terms possible. There is no positive identification of what is seen as having anything to do with any aircraft.

Just read what NIST says:

[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/album2/pict1.jpg?t=1278464845[/qimg]

For your information, "...it is postulated..." means NIST is only making a guess and is not making a factual claim.

So what the hell do you think it's from? Was it someone's paperweight? Part of an office chair? It's landing gear from an aircraft, blockhead. If you're going to toss it out so nonchalantly, you need to tell us what you think the object actually is, instead of handwaving it away purely on semantics.
 
Last edited:
Your query is FUBAR and is a blatant misrepresentation. You have not established what the NYPD has said, let alone where they done so, Thunder.

Please do better.

I have already told you this is ground that has already been gone over. The NIST report describes the information about the perimeter beam with wheely in only the most generic and tentative terms possible. There is no positive identification of what is seen as having anything to do with any aircraft.

Just read what NIST says:

[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/album2/pict1.jpg?t=1278464845[/qimg]

For your information, "...it is postulated..." means NIST is only making a guess and is not making a factual claim.

Are you insane?
Are you suggesting that is not landing gear?
2 planes crashed, what else could it be?
 
"There is no positive identification of what is seen as having anything to do with any aircraft."

:p

Jamm- have you EVER been to NYC and rode on the NYC Subway?
 
Thunder,

Must Jam have to explain everything to you ...?

They looked up at the sound because the it was coming from the underground trains.

:rolleyes:

Tom
They clearly looked up because they were in on it, or they heard the missiles... DUH
 
Just read what NIST says:

[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/album2/pict1.jpg?t=1278464845[/qimg]

For your information, "...it is postulated..." means NIST is only making a guess and is not making a factual claim.

They aren't guessing that its parts of planes.

They are guessing as HOW it came to be on the ground.

Apparently you cant see the difference.
 
For your information, "...it is postulated..." means NIST is only making a guess and is not making a factual claim.

You better read that again Jammonius. The object "postulated" is the panel containing columns 329, 330, & 331.
Did you conveniently skip that part?
 

Hey Lurkers,

I have already commented on that very photo containing handwritten lettering and a 'claim' the FBI has something to do with it.

This is what I have already posted in post # 1612:

"If you dump plane parts into a dumpster without marking them and identifying them, there is nothing at all that prevents someone from walking up and throwing things that weren't there into the pile."

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6093743&postcount=1612

Now, here comes Mikillini and posts up the very photo, from some dumb debunker website, with that inane photo purportedly showing plane parts, FBI, no less, as proof of jetliner crashes on 9/11.

Demand better, posters and do not settle for cheap propaganda.

That photo is worthy of cartoon status and is completely FUBAR.

Ask yourselves, what the heck kind of investigation is presupposed by the sloppy, slipshod, haphazard, stupidly incompetent investigatory circumstances depicted in that photo?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom