• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Are Holder and Obama racists? / DOJ dismisses Black Panther case

BeAChooser

Banned
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Messages
11,716
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...-dismissal-is-sleeper-issue-for-2010-midterms

07/06/10

Earlier today I had the opportunity to attend the United States Commission on Civil Rights’ hearing on the U.S. Department of Justice and the New Black Panther Party litigation. The testimony by the hearing's lone witness, former DoJ lawyer J. Christian Adams, was nothing short of extraordinary.

During the 2008 presidential election, members of the New Black Panther Party were caught on videotape brandishing a nightstick and hurling racial taunts at white and black voters as they sought entry to a polling station in Philadelphia.

Following the irrefutable evidence caught on film of voter intimidation, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against three individuals and the Black Panther Party itself for violating Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act — which prohibits intimidation, threats and coercion. When none of the named defendants nor the New Black Panther Party showed up for trial in April 2009, a default judgment was entered in favor of the government.

… snip … After the government had won its case in the absence of the defense to present itself, the Department of Justice abruptly changed course and sought to voluntarily dismiss the charges against three of the defendants while giving a slap on the hand to another by telling him that he was not able to go to Philadelphia polling stations through the 2012 elections.

… snip …

In emotional testimony, J. Christian Adams, until last week a member of the DoJ's Voting Section — he resigned in protest over the department's handling of the case — told a stunned hearing room why he felt the case had been dropped. In no uncertain terms, Adams noted that senior officials within the Obama Justice Department had told employees that they were not to bring voting-rights cases where the alleged victim in the case was white.

UNBELIEVEABLE.

Holder is not only throwing out the rule of law, but this sounds like racism is rampant in Obama's DOJ.

Is this really the kind of change you Obama supporters wanted?

I'm serious.

Do any of you have the guts to honestly and forthrightly address the issue the above news raises?
 
I honestly and forthrightly call ******** on Adams.

Afterall, just because he's a Teabagger who happened to write this screed last year, comparing Obama to an appeaser, doesn't mean we shouldn't buy his every word on "The New Black Panthers", right? But wait, there's more!

He's part of the politicized DOJ, where they checked for Teabags at the door before hiring?

http://mediamatters.org/research/201007020053

Several attorneys in the Division also told us that Schlozman was open about his disdain for and lack of trust in the attorney staff of the Division. Appellate Section Chief Diana Flynn told us that in conversations with her, Schlozman alternately referred to the Appellate Section lawyers hired during prior administrations as "Democrats" and "liberals," and said they were "disloyal," could not be trusted, and were not "on the team." Flynn said Schlozman pledged to move as many of them out of the Division as he could to make room for the "real Americans" and "right-thinking Americans" he wanted to hire.

And Scholzman hired Adams. Yep, he's on the team alright.

Weren't you just on here claiming not to be a knee jerk right winger?
 
Obama and Holder are Democratic Party members, therefore...

Obama and Holder are obviously racist.
 
Is this really the kind of change you Obama supporters wanted?

I'm serious.

Do any of you have the guts to honestly and forthrightly address the issue the above news raises?
Yes indeed. That's exactly the change we wanted. ;) Thanks Obama and Holder for keeping the white man down. :)
 
Would you folks agree that this is a very serious charge and should be investigated ... by putting people under oath if necessary? I have no problem dealing with the consequences if it turns out that Adams is lying. Then he should be soundly punished ... even charged with perjury if he lies under oath during that investigation. But are you folks willing to do the same if it turns out he is telling the truth about this? Are you willing to call for Holder's dismissal if this is true? Yes or no? Or was all that talk about "hope" and "change" only empty rhetoric on your part?
 
A former Dick Cheney staffer writes an editorial that paints a negative picture of Obama? What's not to believe without any skepticism whatsoever?

eta: Unaboogie beat me to it.
 
Last edited:
Wow, just read the comments on that article. Just over the top Stormfront stuff.

None of this is a surprise. READ HIS STUPID BOOKS! Look where he went to CHURCH. Look at the guy he chose to be his MENTOR. Look at the guy he chose to MARRY him and his wife. Look at the guy he chose to BAPTISE his kids. A White Hating, Jew Hating, America hater.I said it when he first got elected. This is gonna be New york City under David Dinkins. the Blacks are gonna Run Riot, and they're gonna do it with impunity. Just ask AL SHARPTON, Ask the Jews in CROWN HEIGHTS.Obama is a RACIST, pure and simple.

Or...

For those who thought electing a black man president would solve the division in the country, you can go buy a gun now or leave the room.

Teabaggers are despicable. Great job, BAC. You certainly chose something fragrant here.
 
A former Dick Cheney staffer writes an editorial that paints a negative picture of Obama? What's not to believe without any skepticism whatsoever?

Never the less, Upchurch, this is a very serious charge coming from a lawyer who was in the DOJ at the time this happened. Regardless of his politics, don't you think this merits investigation? And if he's lying, and he gets caught at the lie, how does that hurt Holder or the Obama administration ... or those of your political persuasion? It doesn't. Seems to me that could only strengthen your side. So the only reason I can see for you not wanting to investigate this or answer the question I asked is that you actually fear this is true. Because that being proven would seriously hurt the administration and those of your political persuasion.
 
More from the comments section

Obama and his administration push anything for African-Americans and it is a clear transfer of wealth in progress from U.S. taxpayers and property owners to blacks.

Yep, totally dispassionate reporting you've linked to. Nothing racist about these folks. I suggest a special prosecutor.
 
Never the less, Upchurch, this is a very serious charge coming from a lawyer who was in the DOJ at the time this happened. Regardless of his politics, don't you think this merits investigation? And if he's lying, and he gets caught at the lie, how does that hurt Holder or the Obama administration ... or those of your political persuasion? It doesn't. Seems to me that could only strengthen your side. So the only reason I can see for you not wanting to investigate this or answer the question I asked is that you actually fear this is true. Because that being proven would seriously hurt the administration and those of your political persuasion.

Yep. If Holder has nothing to hide, what would it hurt for accusations from GOP strategists to be taken seriously and given the imprimatur of official investigation, led by fellow Teabaggers in and election year? And so what if it's a racially charged accusation based on nothing more than the word of a known Teabagging freak?

I mean, how can this hurt the Democratic Party in any way? What. Could. Go. Wrong?
 
More from the comments section



Yep, totally dispassionate reporting you've linked to. Nothing racist about these folks. I suggest a special prosecutor.

COMMENTS section? Incredible what lengths you'll go to in trying to defend racism. Anyone can enter comments and it's not unheard of for trolls to post comments.
 
COMMENTS section? Incredible what lengths you'll go to in trying to defend racism. Anyone can enter comments and it's not unheard of for trolls to post comments.

Right, it's my fault Teabaggers are all a bunch of racists who keep saying and posting racist things, especially when commenting about a racially tinged charge that depends on the the word of a known partisan and former Cheney staffer.

My bad, fella.
 
Never the less, Upchurch, this is a very serious charge coming from a lawyer who was in the DOJ at the time this happened. Regardless of his politics, don't you think this merits investigation?
I question his honesty. His one-time boss broke a treaty the US had agreed to in order to torture people and he said and did nothing. Now he's a righteous, trustworthy guy?


And if he's lying, and he gets caught at the lie, how does that hurt Holder or the Obama administration ... or those of your political persuasion?
Other than sending an open invitation to every crazy with a bone to pick to waste the President's time with frivolous accusations? Not much ...except that thing I just said.


So the only reason I can see for you not wanting to investigate this or answer the question I asked is that you actually fear this is true.
Well, what can I say? You've always been short-sighted.
 
48-hour rule. Yeah, this guy sounds like a partisan hack.

But I'm also curious to hear the explanation as to why the government would dismiss this case. Perhaps there's a good reason that will be forthcoming.
 

Back
Top Bottom