Ed All 43 videos "Second Hit"" [Explosion]at WTC 2: Plane or No Plane?

[dafydd]

The best response to ideas that are disagreeable are ideas that refute. Posters here do not engage in refutation; rather, they post up stupid jokes and dumb cartoons.

Discussion with you is pointless.There were planes,they hit the towers and the sane world knows that.

 

[dafydd]

Or, you know, questions that you can't answer.

Or gotchas in Jammyspeak.

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

The best response to ideas that are disagreeable are ideas that refute. Posters here do not engage in refutation; rather, they post up stupid jokes and dumb cartoons.

I hate to quote Alex Jones- but in his words, "..No planers are nuts"...

People see you as a clown Jammy..

You frame your arguments with illogic, and never give direct answers to questions, such as providing never examples of proof to back your assertions . With you, it's always a circular debate.

Even crazy 9/11 Truthers concider your line of thinking as being insane...
Most of them think 'no-planers' are actually on a disinformation campaign to paint all Truthers as being lunatics.
The scary thing is that there really are people who are no-planers, as you have so well demonstrated.

 

[Thunder]

Jamm- the Naudet brother's video of the 1st plane has the sound of the engines.

clearly, videos that are taken right next to the towers have the sound of the plane blured our by the sound of the impact and explosion.

 

[fess]

That quoted above is horribly violative of the first requirement of logic. You cannot assume facts that have not been proven. Yet, that is exactly what you did.

This statement, coming from someone that hasn’t provided one iota of proof of any of his claims, is a gem to say the least.

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

Jamm- the Naudet brother's video of the 1st plane has the sound of the engines.

clearly, videos that are taken right next to the towers have the sound of the plane blured our by the sound of the impact and explosion.

No planers think the Naudet footage is fake

 

[excaza]

The best response to ideas that are disagreeable are ideas that refute. Posters here do not engage in refutation; rather, they post up stupid jokes and dumb cartoons.

That's funny, I asked you direct questions that are relevant to the topic (pertaining specifically to your 'knowledge' of elementary physics) and you ignored them. Discussion with you is pointless, you're off in your own little demented world.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Grasp this, posters and lurkers. The utter and complete failure to include a proper sound component to the video and pyrotechnical deception is the main epistemological clue that we have for successfully unraveling the 9/11 hoax. In order to continue adherence in the common storyline of 9/11, one has to discount one's own sense of hearing and understanding of sound. The only question that remains is this:

For how long can posters continue to disregard their own capacity for hearing and their own ability to analyze the information imparted by the sounds that are in the record of events of what happened at the South Tower on 9/11 at 9:03AM?

Good luck

How long can you continue to play dumb, Jam?

 

[fess]

Ah, finally, after 46 pages, and over 1800 posts, a summary. Unfortunately, the summary turns out to be nothing more than a continuation of the BS that started this thread. A thread by the way, that contained some of the most outrageous claims ever posted, claims that were not backed up by any substantial proof whatsoever.
A total disastrous, epic failure.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Ah, finally, after 46 pages, and over 1800 posts, a summary. Unfortunately, the summary turns out to be nothing more than a continuation of the BS that started this thread. A thread by the way, that contained some of the most outrageous claims ever posted, claims that were not backed up by any substantial proof whatsoever.
A total disastrous, epic failure.

I agree Fess, this thread is like an unsinkable ship that does sink.

 

[Edx]

I'd like to see a video of no plane, has Jammy ever posted that?

 

[jammonius]

Lest we forget, Lurkers, there is still no valid refutation of the NO PLANE evidence

Hey Lurkers,

Recall post # 1810;

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6099287&postcount=1810

There is still no refutation at all that relies on any data that can be double checked for accuracy. True, we have some claims that are in the nature of 'see no evil, hear none, etc.' and that claim is made in the context of a thread dealing with all the known video versions of the second set of explosions occuring at 9:03AM, at the South Tower of the WTC on 9/11; followed by a page-by-page, video segment-by-video segment review of that data and still posters claim they see on proof, and such like.

Lurkers;

that is rich.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

In the absence of specific datapoints, you do not refute the claims concerning what the videos show and how they sound and the claims I am making therefore stand as unrefuted.

You can't refute subsonic sound from planes traveling at subsonic speed. Ever heard of the sound barrier being broken after a supersonic jet passes & after it passes there's the sound behind it? Apparently in that Truther skull of yours, you don't know the answer!

 

[fitzgibbon]

Ladies and gentlemen, lurkers world-wide,

What you are witnessing from jammonius is the Internet equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and going "La, la, la.....I can't hear what you're saying".

Fitz

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

Hey Lurkers,

Recall post # 1810;

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6099287&postcount=1810

There is still no refutation at all.

How about providing *PROOF* to back your many outlandish claims?
You obviously think the eye witnesse to the plane crashes are liars or were wrong- You've said you think all of the plane wreckage was planted.
What is your proof for this?

What makes you think you have a better grasp on what happened at the WTC than people who were actually there?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Ladies and gentlemen, lurkers world-wide,

What you are witnessing from jammonius is the Internet equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and going "La, la, la.....I can't hear what you're saying".

Fitz

Jam better not upset this Wookie. I've been known to pull peoples arms out of their sockets when they ignore me. LOL!

 

[Pinch]

The best response to ideas that are disagreeable are ideas that refute. Posters here do not engage in refutation; rather, they post up stupid jokes and dumb cartoons.

Why? Why is anyone still talking with this person?

It has to be some sort of intellectual bear-baiting, which I heartily approve since no real bears are being harmed in this entertainment. Toying with someone as intellectually deficient and logic-challenged as this jammonious person is borders on cruel and unusual mental torture - which is fine with me.

 

[excaza]

Ladies and gentlemen, lurkers world-wide,

What you are witnessing from jammonius is the Internet equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and going "La, la, la.....I can't hear what you're saying".

Fitz

 

[Tinfoil Hater]

Why? Why is anyone still talking with this person?

It has to be some sort of intellectual bear-baiting, which I heartily approve since no real bears are being harmed in this entertainment. Toying with someone as intellectually deficient and logic-challenged as this jammonious person is borders on cruel and unusual mental torture - which is fine with me.

The funny thing is his theories are so out there, he'd be ridiculed on most Truther blogs...

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Hasn't anyone gone to great lengths to see what Jam's name is BTW?

http://wewantinformation.com/911-co...d-jref-member-kicked-off-ae911truth-petition/