There is a continuous line between pure and lethal parsitism and perfect symbiosis. We can name it and catergorize it as we please, but it makes no difference. Each species of organism does what it does for its own sake. A symbiotic relationship is simply one where both species have managed to get a fair trade.
I think the categories you quote are a little useless because more often than not, we are not able to place a given relationship so precisely in a category.
Hans
Sorry it is detailed definitions;
The term symbiosis (from the Greek: σύν syn "with"; and βίωσις biosis "living") commonly describes close and often long-term interactions between different biological species. The term was first used in 1879 by the German mycologist Heinrich Anton de Bary, who defined it as "the living together of unlike organisms."[1][2] The definition of symbiosis is in flux, and the term has been applied to a wide range of biological interactions. The symbiotic relationship may be categorized as mutualistic, commensal, or parasitic in nature.[3][4] Others define it more narrowly, as only those persistent relationships from which both organisms benefit, in which case it would be synonymous with mutualism[1][5][6][7].
Symbiotic relationships include those associations in which one organism lives on another (ectosymbiosis, such as mistletoe), or where one partner lives inside the other (endosymbiosis, such as lactobacilli and other bacteria in humans or zooxanthelles in corals). Symbiotic relationships may be either obligate, i.e., necessary for the survival of at least one of the organisms involved, or facultative, where the relationship is beneficial but not essential for survival of the organisms
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbiosis
Till yesyerday I was also misunderstanding (evidance: yesyerday I mentioned in one post that we can improve when we shall develop symbiotic relationship. I was thinking, how to mention it accurately.
